Combined Arms Obstacle Integration by Department of the Army - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

index-28_12.png

FM 90-7

support current and future operations. Obsta-

emplacement authority and providing obsta-

cle control ensures that subordinate com-

cle control. Table 2-2 summarizes some con-

manders emplace obstacles to best support

siderations for use of obstacle-control

the higher commander’s scheme of maneuver.

measures. Figure 2-9 shows the obstacle-

Obstacle control also ensures that subordi-

control- measure graphics. Chapter 3 covers

nate commanders do not emplace obstacles

the use of obstacle-control measures to sup-

that will interfere with future operations.

port obstacle integration. Obstacle-control

Commanders maintain obstacle control by—

measures are—

Focusing or withholding emplacement

Zones.

authority.

Belts.

Restricting types or locations of obsta-

Groups.

cles.

Restrictions.

Commanders use control measures, specific

Obstacle Zones.

guidance, and orders to maintain obstacle

Obstacle zones are a

control.

graphic control measure that corps and divi-

sion commanders use to grant obstacle-

emplacement authority to brigades (includ-

Obstacle-Control Measures

ing armored cavalry regiments (ACR) and

Obstacle-control measures are specific control

other major subordinate units). Corps

measures that simplify granting obstacle-

and division commanders also use zones to

2-12 Obstacle Framework

index-29_1.png

index-29_2.png

index-29_3.png

index-29_4.png

FM 90-7

ensure that subordinates emplace obstacles

Obstacle zones do not cross brigade bound-

that support the higher commander’s

aries. Commanders assign zones to a single

scheme of maneuver and that do not

subordinate unit to ensure unity of effort,

interfere with future operations. Chapter 4

just as they would defensive sectors or battle

covers the use of obstacle zones for obstacle

positions (BPs). This keeps tactical obstacle

planning.

responsibility along the same lines as con-

trol of direct and indirect fires. This does not

Corps and divisions plan obstacle zones

normally create a vulnerability on the

based on brigade AOs. When defending

boundary between units since commanders

against an enemy of similar composition and

base both sectors and obstacle zones on

capability, they align brigades and zones

defined AAs.

with enemy division AAs as defined by

Adjacent brigades may rarely cover the

regimental MCs. However, a light division

same AA, but obstacle zones still do not

defending against a mechanized enemy may

cross unit boundaries. Commanders give

plan obstacle zones based on enemy regimen-

adjacent brigades obstacle zones that meet

tal AAs as defined by battalion-size MCs. In

along their boundaries. To ensure unity of

the offense, zone planning is more flexible.

obstacle effort, the commander designates a

Corps and divisions still align obstacle zones

contact point for obstacle coordination

with areas for which brigades are responsi-

between the adjacent brigades. The division

ble. In any case, if the obstacle zone encom-

commander also may assign more than

passes the entire brigade sector, another

one zone to a unit. This technique is useful

graphic is unnecessary. Commanders may

when the commander wants to constrain

designate the entire sector as an obstacle

tactical obstacle employment to two or more

zone, with the unit boundaries defining the

specific areas, leaving the remainder free for

geographical limits of the zone.

division maneuver.

Obstacle Framework 2-13

index-30_1.png

FM 90-7

Commanders can assign an obstacle intent

boundaries. A single unit is responsible for a

to an obstacle zone, but they normally do

belt; however, commanders may assign

not. Although the target (normally an enemy

more than one belt to a unit. TF command-

division) and relative location (the area of

ers cannot plan or emplace obstacles outside

the zone) are apparent, commanders nor-

brigade-directed obstacle belts. Command-

mally do not specify an obstacle effect for

ers use the same techniques as for obstacle

a zone. This allows the subordinate com-

zones to ensure coordination along unit

mander flexibility in using obstacles. Estab-

boundaries and may designate entire TF

lishing zone priorities helps identify the

sectors as obstacle belts.

division obstacle main effort to subordinates.

Brigade commanders normally assign an

Obstacle zones also assist the corps or divi-

obstacle intent to each obstacle belt. As with

sion staff to resource and plan obstacle logis-

the obstacle zone, the target and relative

tics throughput to the brigades. Staffs

location are apparent. The addition of a spe-

resource obstacle zones by anticipating how

cific obstacle effect gives purpose and direc-

the brigades will use obstacles based on

tion to TF obstacle planning. When brigade

their assigned mission, intelligence prepara-

commanders assign an obstacle effect, they

tion of the battlefield (IPB), task organiza-

ensure that obstacles within the belt com-

tion, and division commander’s intent.

Appendix C contains a detailed discussion of plement the brigade fire plan. The combina-obstacle resourcing and supply.

tion of obstacle belts with specific effects is

the commander’s obstacle intent. It conveys

Obstacle Belts. Obstacle belts are the the effect that must be achieved by fires and

graphic control measure that brigade com-

obstacles (obstacle effect) against a specific

manders use to constrain tactical obsta-

enemy (target) within the defined belt (rela-

cle employment. They plan obstacle belts

tive location) to his TF commanders.

within assigned obstacle zones to grant

obstacle-emplacement authority to their

Obstacle belts refine the area authorized for

major subordinate units. Obstacle belts also

tactical obstacles; however, they still give

focus obstacles in support of the brigade

TF commanders the latitude they need to

scheme of maneuver and ensure that obsta-

develop detailed obstacle plans based on

cles do not interfere with the maneuver of

direct-fire planning. The brigade com-

any higher HQ Chapter 4 contains a

mander’s obstacle intent is descriptive

detailed discussion of the use of obstacle

rather than prescriptive. Assigning a spe-

belts for obstacle planning.

cific obstacle effect to a belt does not prevent

Brigade commanders use obstacle belts to

TF commanders from employing the full

attack the maneuver of enemy regiments (or

range of tactical obstacle effects within the

enemy brigade-size units). They plan and

belt; however, the combined effect must

allocate belts against regimental AAs based

achieve the assigned intent of the belt.

on battalion MCs. This is consistent with

Obstacle belts are also critical tools in

brigade planning, which allocates companies

resourcing and planning obstacle logistics.

against battalion MCs and task organizes

There are two key components to logistically

TFs to defeat enemy regiments. As with

sustaining the obstacle effort:

obstacle zones, light units defending against

mechanized forces focus obstacle belts one

The commander and staff must

resource the belt with the material,

echelon down.

manpower, and time required to

For the same reasons as discussed in obsta-

emplace the obstacles to meet the

cle zones, obstacle belts do not cross unit

intent.

2-14 Obstacle Framework

index-31_1.png

FM 90-7

The brigade must develop a plan for

forces. Unlike obstacle zones or belts,

getting the necessary resources to the

obstacle groups are not areas but are rela-

right place, in the right amount, and in

tive locations for actual obstacles. Com-

sufficient time.

manders normally show obstacle groups

using the obstacle effect graphics. When

Obstacle belts help the staff to identify

detailed planning is possible (to include

requirements and plan transportation.

detailed on-the-ground reconnaissance),

Appendix C contains a more detailed descrip-commanders may show obstacle groups

tion of belt resourcing and supply.

using individual obstacle graphics. Chapter

NOTE: The commander at corps, di-

5 contains a detailed discussion of the use vision, or brigade level may autho-of obstacle groups in obstacle planning.

rize emplacement authority for

Commanders can plan obstacle groups with-

certain types of protective obsta-

in the limits of their obstacle-emplacement

cles outside of obstacle zones or

authority. Corps and division commanders

belts. Normally, the commander

can plan obstacle groups anywhere in

will authorize company team and

their AOs. Brigade and TF commanders

base commanders to emplace pro-

can plan them anywhere in their obstacle

tective obstacles within 500 meters

zones or belts, respectively. Because of the

of their positions (mission, enemy,

requirement for detailed integration with

troops, terrain, and time available

the fire plan, very few obstacle groups

(METT-T) dependent). The com-

are planned above TF level. Unless solely

mander usually limits the types of

integrated with indirect fires, obstacle

obstacles that a unit may use for

groups planned at corps, division, or bri-

protective obstacles that are out-

gade level ultimately are integrated with

side of obstacle-control measures

fire at the TF level. When given a belt with

(for example, allowing only wire

an assigned intent, the TF commander can

and antipersonnel (AP) mines out-

use any combination of group effects if the

side of control measures for protec-

sum effect of all groups achieves the belt

tive obstacles and requiring that

intent.

minefield be fenced on all sides to

prevent fratricide).

Obstacle groups impose strict limitations

on company team commanders to preserve

Obstacle Groups. Obstacle groups are one the link between obstacle effects and the

or more individual obstacles grouped to pro-

fire plan. The limitations are similar to the

vide a specific obstacle effect. TFs use obsta-

limitations imposed by a BP. A group does

cle groups to ensure that company teams

not give the exact location of obstacles in

emplace individual obstacles that support

the group just as a BP does not show the

the TF scheme of maneuver. In rare cases,

exact location of each weapon in the com-

brigades, divisions, or even corps may use

pany team. The company team commander

obstacle groups for specific tactical obstacles.

and the emplacing unit leader, usually an

Also, units integrate obstacle groups with

engineer, coordinate these details directly.

direct- and indirect-fire plans in detail.

The company team commander and the

Obstacle groups usually attack the maneu-

engineer can adjust obstacles in the group

ver of enemy battalions. Normally, com-

if the intent and link to the fire plan

manders plan obstacle groups along enemy

remain intact. Company team commanders

battalion AAs as defined by company MCs.

make minor changes to obstacles and fire-

They may plan a group along a company-size

control measures based on the reality of the

AA. This is especially true for friendly light

terrain. For example, a commander may

Obstacle Framework 2-15

FM 90-7

move a fixing obstacle group and direct-fire

that impair future operations. It also allows

target reference points (TRPs) a few hun-

commanders to focus the use of limited

dred meters to avoid having them masked

resources for the main effort by restricting

by rolling terrain. A major change to the

their use elsewhere. Commanders also may

obstacle-group location requires the

use restrictions to prevent subordinates

approval of the commander who ordered the

from emplacing obstacles in a certain area.

obstacle group emplacement.

This type of restriction may be shown graph-

Obstacle-ADgroup responsibility falls along

ically as an obstacle restricted area.

the same lines as fire control. Normally,

Units also may indicate this type of restric-

company team fire plans are relatively sim-

tion in the operation order (OPORD). For

ple, massing the company team’s fires on a

example, the order may state that there will

single AA at a time. Simplicity is essential in

be no obstacles along a designated main

ensuring that company team commanders

supply route (MSR) or no demolition of a

can focus their C2 on maximizing the

certain bridge. This type of restriction also

effects of the obstacle group. A TF should

may be implied. For example, a planned

not assign a company team more than

corps counterattack (CATK) axis implies to

two obstacle groups; however, it can effec-

the division that the axis is an obstacle

tively fight only one group at a time. To

restricted area. Subordinate commanders

mass fires on an obstacle group, more than

have the right to be more restrictive than

one company team will often cover a sin-

the higher commander; however, the subor-

gle obstacle group. In these cases, the com-

dinate commander cannot relax the higher

mander who is responsible for establishing

commander’s restrictions.

the EA is also in charge of integrating the

obstacle group. Normally, the TF com-

Obstacle Numbers

mander or Operations and Training Officer

(US Army) (S3) plays a significant role in

Obstacle zones, belts, and groups are labeled

building and synchronizing an EA covered

with alphanumeric designators. An obstacle

by two or more companies.

number is a twelve-character designator

that is given to each individual obstacle.

Obstacle groups, resource factors, and stan-

The first four characters designate the HQ

dard individual obstacles are the basis of TF

that ordered the obstacle zone. The next

obstacle logistics planning. They enable the

three characters are a letter for the obstacle

commander and staff to allocate the neces-

zone, a number for the obstacle belt, and

sary resources to each obstacle group, EA, or

another letter for the obstacle group. The

company team BP. These tools also enable

next two characters are an abbreviation of

the staff to identify critical shortfalls, plan

the individual obstacle type. This is fol-

the flow of materials within the TF area, and

lowed by a two-digit number indicating the

schedule resupply, Appendix C addresses

number of the individual obstacle in the

obstacle resourcing in detail.

group. The last character is a status code.

Obstacle Restrictions. Commanders at all Appendix B contains a detailed explanation levels may use obstacle restrictions to pro-of the use of the alphanumeric designator in

vide additional obstacle control. Command-

the obstacle reporting and recording system.

ers may use obstacle restrictions to limit the

The terms and definitions used in this chap-

specific types of obstacles used (for example,

ter lay the groundwork for understanding

no buried mines or no SCATMINEs). These

the remainder of this manual. The following

restrictions ensure that subordinates do

chapters explain obstacle integration and

not use obstacles with characteristics

planning.

2-16 Obstacle Framework

index-33_1.png

index-33_2.png

index-33_3.png

FM 90-7

Chapter 3

Obstacle-Integration

Principles

Obstacle integration is the process of ensur-

process (FM 34-130 covers the IPB process ing that the obstacle effects support the

in detail). The IPB integrates enemy doc-

scheme of maneuver. Obstacle integration

trine with the terrain and weather, mission,

cuts across all functional areas and all eche-

and current battlefield situation. The IPB

lons. An understanding of the basic princi-

process helps the commander to—

ples behind obstacle integration is essential

Decide where to kill the enemy.

for commanders and staffs at all levels.

Define the decisive point based on the

These principles are the cornerstone for

terrain, enemy doctrine, and vulnera-

obstacle planning discussed in Chapters 4

bilities.

and 5.

Key steps in the IPB process are to—

Commanders and staffs consider the follow-

ing to ensure that obstacles have the desired

Analyze the terrain.

impact on the battle:

Determine enemy force size.

Intelligence.

Determine enemy vulnerability.

Obstacle intent.

Fires and obstacle effects.

ANALYZE THE TERRAIN

Obstacles and operations in depth.

Staffs conduct terrain analysis based on the

Obstacle control.

five military aspects of terrain: observation

Echelons of obstacle planning.

and fields of fire, cover and concealment,

obstacles, key terrain, and avenues of

approach (OCOKA). The obstacles in

INTELLIGENCE

OCOKA are normally existing obstacles;

Battlefield success depends largely on the

however, reinforcing obstacles from previ-

ability of the commander to see the battle-

ous military operations may be present in

field. He identifies enemy vulnerabilities

some situations. The identification of MCs

and how the enemy may use the existing ter-

and AAs helps the commander to decide

rain to gain an advantage. The maneuver

where the enemy can maneuver and to iden-

commander does this through the IPB

tify any limitations on friendly maneuver.

Obstacle Integration Principles 3-1

index-34_1.png

FM 90-7

DETERMINE ENEMY FORCE SIZE

block. This provides a common expectation

The next step is to determine the size of the

of the effect that the commander wants

enemy force that each AA can support. The

their fires and obstacles to have on enemy

primary reason for determining the size of

maneuver.

the enemy force is to allocate friendly forces.

An important consideration is to identify

RELATIVE LOCATION

any terrain that may cause the enemy to

change formation.

Obstacle location is a vital component of

obstacle intent since it ties the obstacle

effect and target to the scheme of maneuver.

DETERMINE ENEMY VULNERABILITY

Subordinates must understand the relative

In the last step, the commander and staff

location of obstacles to ensure that the

consider where the enemy is vulnerable.

desired effect occurs at the right place. Com-

Attacking the enemy at the point of vulnera-

manders establish their obstacle intent con-

bility with fires and obstacles can lead to a

current with organizing and developing the

decisive victory. Also, obstacles should be

fire plan or scheme of maneuver. Each com-

designed against an enemy’s breaching vul-

ponent of obstacle intent directly influences

nerability. If some types of obstacles can be

the fire plan or scheme of maneuver. Obsta-

easily breached by the enemy, using those

cle planning does not drive fire planning or

obstacles to shape the battlefield may be

the scheme of maneuver. Subordinates

ineffective.

plan, adjust, and execute obstacles and fire-

and maneuver-control measures to meet the

commander’s obstacle intent.

OBSTACLE INTENT

Figure 3-1 illustrates the impact that obsta-The commander decides how he wants to use

cle intent can have on adjusting fire-control

obstacles to support his scheme of maneu-

measures at the TF level. The TF com-

ver. He defines the end result that fires and

obstacles must achieve. His obstacle intent

mander assigns Team A to occupy and

provides purpose and unity of effort to the

defend BP 10 oriented in EA Blue on TRPs

obst