Studies in the psychology of sex, volume 4 (of 6) by Havelock Ellis. - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

often the favorite scent of sensuous persons, which really owes a large

part of its potency to the presence of the crude animal sexual odors of

musk and civet. It consists of wash-leather steeped in ottos of neroli,

rose, santal, lavender, verbena, bergamot, cloves, and cinnamon,

subsequently smeared with civet and musk. It is said by some, probably

with a certain degree of truth, that Peau d'Espagne is of all perfumes

that which most nearly approaches the odor of a woman's skin; whether it

also suggests the odor of leather is not so clear.

There is, however, no doubt that the smell of leather has a curiously

stimulating sexual influence on many men and women. It is an odor which

seems to occupy an intermediate place between the natural body odors and

the artificial perfumes for which it sometimes serves as a basis; possibly

it is to this fact that its occasional sexual influence is owing, for, as

we have already seen, there is a tendency for sexual allurement to attach

to odors which are not the specific personal body odors but yet are

related to them. Moll considers, no doubt rightly, that shoe fetichism,

perhaps the most frequent of sexual fetichistic perversions, is greatly

favored, if, indeed, it does not owe its origin to, the associated odor of

the feet and of the shoes.[66] He narrates a case of shoe fetichism in a

man in which the perversion began at the age of 6; when for the first time

he wore new shoes, having previously used only the left-off shoes of his

elder brother; he felt and smelt these new shoes with sensations of

unmeasured pleasure; and a few years later began to use shoes as a method

of masturbation.[67] Näcke has also recorded the case of a shoe fetichist

who declared that the sexual attraction of shoes (usually his wife's) lay

largely in the odor of the leather.[68] Krafft-Ebing, again, brings

forward a case of shoe fetichism in which the significant fact is

mentioned that the subject bought a pair of leather cuffs to smell while

masturbating.[69] Restif de la Bretonne, who was somewhat of a shoe

fetichist, appears to have enjoyed smelling shoes. It is not probable that

the odor of leather explains the whole of shoe fetichism,--as we shall see

when, in another "Study," this question comes before us-

-and in many cases

it cannot be said to enter at all; it is, however, one of the factors.

Such a conclusion is further supported by the fact that by many the odor

of new shoes is sometimes desired as an adjuvant to coitus. It is in the

experience of prostitutes that such a device is not infrequent. Näcke

mentions that a colleague of his was informed by a prostitute that several

of her clients desired the odor of new shoes in the room, and that she was

accustomed to obtain the desired perfume by holding her shoes for a moment

over the flame of a spirit lamp.

The direct sexual influence of the odor of leather is, however, more

conclusively proved by those instances in which it exists apart from shoes

or other objects having any connection with the human body. I have

elsewhere in these "Studies"[71] recorded the case of a lady, entirely

normal in sexual and other respects, who is conscious of a considerable

degree of pleasurable sexual excitement in the presence of the smell of

leather objects, more especially of leather-bound ledgers and in shops

where leather objects are sold. She thinks this dates from the period

when, as a child of 9, she was sometimes left alone for a time on a high

stool in an office. A possible explanation in this case lies in the

supposition that on one of these early occasions sexual excitement was

produced by the contact with the stool (in a way that is not infrequent in

young girls) and that the accidentally associated odor of leather

permanently affected the nervous system, while the really significant

contact left no permanent impression. Even on such a supposition it might,

however, still be maintained that a real potency of the leather odor is

illustrated by this case, and this is likewise suggested by the fact that

the same subject is also sexually affected by various perfumes and odorous

flowers not recalling leather.[70]

It has been suggested to me by a lady that the odor of leather suggests

that of the sexual organs. The same suggestion is made by Hagen,[72] and I

find it stated by Gould and Pyle that menstruating girls sometimes smell

of leather. The secret of its influence may thus be not altogether

obscure; in the fact that leather is animal skin, and that it may thus

vaguely stir the olfactory sensibilities which had been ancestrally

affected by the sexual stimulus of the skin odor lies the probable

foundation of the mystery.

In the absence of all suggestion of personal or animal odors, in its most

exquisite forms in the fragrance of flowers, olfactory sensations are

still very frequently of a voluptuous character.

Mantegazza has remarked

that it is a proof of the close connection between the sense of smell and

the sexual organs that the expression of pleasure produced by olfaction

resembles the expression of sexual pleasures.[73] Make the chastest woman

smell the flowers she likes best, he remarks, and she will close her eyes,

breathe deeply, and, if very sensitive, tremble all over, presenting an

intimate picture which otherwise she never shows, except perhaps to her

lover. He mentions a lady who said: "I sometimes feel such pleasure in

smelling flowers that I seem to be committing a sin."[74] It is really the

case that in many persons--usually, if not exclusively, women--the odor of

flowers produces not only a highly pleasurable, but a distinctly and

specifically sexual, effect. I have met with numerous cases in which this

effect was well marked. It is usually white flowers with heavy,

penetrating odors which exert this influence. Thus, one lady (who is

similarly affected by various perfumes, forget-me-nots, ylang-ylang,

etc.) finds that a number of flowers produce on her a definite sexual

effect, with moistening of the pudenda. This effect is especially produced

by white flowers like the gardenia, tuberose, etc.

Another lady, who lives

in India, has a similar experience with flowers. She writes: A scent to

cause me sexual excitement must be somewhat heavy and _penetrating_.

Nearly all white flowers so affect me and many Indian flowers with heavy,

almost pungent scents. (All the flower scents are quite unconnected with

me with any individual.) Tuberose, lilies of the valley, and frangipani

flowers have an almost intoxicating effect on me.

Violets, roses,

mignonette, and many others, though very delicious, give me no sexual

feeling at all. For this reason the line, 'The lilies and languors of

virtue for the roses and raptures of vice' seems all wrong to me. The lily

seems to me a very sensual flower, while the rose and its scent seem very

good and countrified and virtuous. Shelley's description of the lily of

the valley, 'whom youth makes so fair and _passion_ so pale,' falls in

much more with my ideas. "I can quite understand," she adds, "that

leather, especially of books, might have an exciting effect, as the smell

has this _penetrating_ quality, but I do not think it produces any special

feeling in me." This more sensuous character of white flowers is fairly

obvious to many persons who do not experience from them any specifically

sexual effects. To some people lilies have an odor which they describe as

sexual, although these persons may be quite unaware that Hindu authors

long since described the vulvar secretion of the _Padmini_, or perfect

woman, during coitus, as "perfumed like the lily that has newly

burst."[75] It is noteworthy that it was more especially the white

flowers--lily, tuberose, etc.--which were long ago noted by Cloquet as

liable to cause various unpleasant nervous effects, cardiac oppression and

syncope.[76]

When we are concerned with the fragrances of flowers it would seem that we

are far removed from the human sexual field, and that their sexual effects

are inexplicable. It is not so. The animal and vegetable odors, as,

indeed, we have already seen, are very closely connected. The recorded

cases are very numerous in which human persons have exhaled from their

skins--sometimes in a very pronounced degree--the odors of plants and

flowers, of violets, of roses, of pineapple, of vanilla.

On the other

hand, there are various plant odors which distinctly recall, not merely

the general odor of the human body, but even the specifically sexual

odors. A rare garden weed, the stinking goosefoot, _Chenopodium vulvaria_,

it is well known, possesses a herring brine or putrid fish odor--due, it

appears, to propylamin, which is also found in the flowers of the common

white thorn or mayflower (_Cratægus oxyacantha_) and many others of the

_Rosaceæ_--which recalls the odor of the animal and human sexual

regions.[77] The reason is that both plant and animal odors belong

chemically to the same group of capryl odors (Linnæus's _Odores hircini_),

so called from the goat, the most important group of odors from the sexual

point of view. Caproic and capryl acid are contained not only in the odor

of the goat and in human sweat, and in animal products as many cheeses,

but also in various plants, such as Herb Robert (_Geranium robertianum_),

and the Stinking St. John's worts (_Hypericum hircinum_), as well as the

_Chenopodium_. Zwaardemaker considers it probable that the odor of the

vagina belongs to the same group, as well as the odor of semen (which

Haller called _odor aphrodisiacus_), which last odor is also found, as

Cloquet pointed out, in the flowers of the common berberry (_Berberis

vulgaris_) and in the chestnut. A very remarkable and significant example

of the same odor seems to occur in the case of the flowers of the henna

plant, the white-flowered Lawsonia (_Lawsonia inermis_), so widely used in

some Mohammedan lands for dyeing the nails and other parts of the body.

"These flowers diffuse the sweetest odor," wrote Sonnini in Egypt a

century ago; "the women delight to wear them, to adorn their houses with

them, to carry them to the baths, to hold them in their hands, and to

perfume their bosoms with them. They cannot patiently endure that

Christian and Jewish women shall share the privilege with them. It is very

remarkable that the perfume of the henna flowers, when closely inhaled, is

almost entirely lost in a very decided spermatic odor.

If the flowers are

crushed between the fingers this odor prevails, and is, indeed, the only

one perceptible. It is not surprising that so delicious a flower has

furnished Oriental poetry with many charming traits and amorous similes."

Such a simile Sonnini finds in the _Song of Songs_, i.

13-14.[78]

The odor of semen has not been investigated, but, according to

Zwaardemaker, artificially produced odors (like cadaverin) resemble it.

The odor of the leguminous fenugreek, a botanical friend considers,

closely approaches the odor given off in some cases by the armpit in

women. It is noteworthy that fenugreek contains cumarine, which imparts

its fragrance to new-mown hay and to various flowers of somewhat similar

odor. On some persons these have a sexually exciting effect, and it is of

considerable interest to observe that they recall to many the odor of

semen. "It seems very natural," a lady writes, "that flowers, etc., should

have an exciting effect, as the original and by far the pleasantest way of

love-making was in the open among flowers and fields; but a more purely

physical reason may, I think, be found in the exact resemblance between

the scent of semen and that of the pollen of flowering grasses. The first

time I became aware of this resemblance it came on me with a rush that

here was the explanation of the very exciting effect of a field of

flowering grasses and, perhaps through them, of the scents of other

flowers. If I am right, I suppose flower scents should affect women more

powerfully than men in a sexual way. I do not think anyone would be likely

to notice the odor of semen in this connection unless they had been

greatly struck by the exciting effects of the pollen of grasses. I had

often noticed it and puzzled over it." As pollen is the male sexual

element of flowers, its occasionally stimulating effect in this direction

is perhaps but an accidental result of a unity running through the organic

world, though it may be perhaps more simply explained as a special form of

that nasal irritation which is felt by so many persons in a hay-field.

Another correspondent, this time a man, tells me that he has noted the

resemblance of the odor of semen to that of crushed grasses. A scientific

friend who has done much work in the field of organic chemistry tells me

he associates the odor of semen with that produced by diastasic action on

mixing flour and water, which he regards as sexual in character. This

again brings us to the starchy products of the leguminous plants. It is

evident that, subtle and obscure as many questions in the physiology and

psychology of olfaction still remain, we cannot easily escape from their

sexual associations.

FOOTNOTES:

[53] H. Beauregard, _Matière Médicale Zoölogique: Histoire des Drogues

d'origine Animate_, 1901.

[54] Professor Plateau, of Ghent, has for many years carried on a series

of experiments which would even tend to show that insects are scarcely

attracted by the colors of flowers at all, but mainly influenced by a

sense which would appear to be smell. His experiments have been recorded

during recent years (from 1887) in the _Bulletins de l'Académie Royale de

Belgique_, and have from time to time been summarized in _Nature_, e.g.,

February 5, 1903.

[55] David Sharp, _Cambridge Natural History: Insects_, Part II, p. 398.

[56] Mantegazza, _Fisiologia dell' Amore_, 1873, p. 176.

[57] Mantegazza (_L'Amour dans l'Humanité_, p. 94) refers to various

peoples who practice this last custom. Egypt was a great centre of the

practice more than 3000 years ago.

[58] Hagen, _Sexuelle Osphrésiologie_, 1901, p. 226. It has been suggested

to me by a medical correspondent that one of the primitive objects of the

hair, alike on head, mons veneris, and axilla, was to collect sweat and

heighten its odor to sexual ends.

[59] The names of all our chief perfumes are Arabic or Persian: civet,

musk, ambergris, attar, camphor, etc.

[60] Cloquet (_Osphrésiologie_, pp. 73-76) has an interesting passage on

the prevalence of the musk odor in animals, plants, and even mineral

substances.

[61] Laycock brings together various instances of the sexual odors of

animals, insisting on their musky character (_Nervous Diseases of Women_;

section, "Odors"). See also a section in the _Descent of Man_ (Part II,

Chapter XVIII), in which Darwin argues that "the most odoriferous males

are the most successful in winning the females." Distant also has an

interesting paper on this subject, "Biological Suggestions," _Zoölogist_,

May, 1902; he points out the significant fact that musky odors are usually

confined to the male, and argues that animal odors generally are more

often attractive than protective.

[62] R. Whytt, _Works_, 1768, p. 543.

[63] Lucretius, VI, 790-5.

[64] Mohammed, said Ayesha, was very fond of perfumes, especially "men's

scents," musk and ambergris. He used also to burn camphor on odoriferous

wood and enjoy the fragrant smell, while he never refused perfumes when

offered them as a present. The things he cared for most, said Ayesha, were

women, scents, and foods. Muir, _Life of Mahomet_, vol.

iii, p. 297.

[65] H. ten Kate, _International Centralblatt für Anthropologie_, Ht. 6,

1902. This author, who made observations on Japanese with Zwaardemaker's

olfactometer, found that, contrary to an opinion sometimes stated, they

have a somewhat defective sense of smell. He remarks that there are no

really native Japanese perfumes.

[66] Moll: _Die Konträre Sexualempfindung_, third edition, 1890, p. 306.

[67] Moll: _Libido Sexualis_, bd. 1, p. 284.

[68] P. Näcke, "Un Cas de Fetichisme de Souliers,"

_Bulletin de la Société

de Médecine Mentale de Belgique_, 1894.

[69] _Psychopathia Sexualis_, English edition, p. 167.

[70] Philip Salmuth (_Observationes Medicæ_, Centuria II, no. 63) in the

seventeenth century recorded a case in which a young girl of noble birth

(whose sister was fond of eating chalk, cinnamon, and cloves) experienced

extreme pleasure in smelling old books. It would appear, however, that in

this case the fascination lay not so much in the odor of the leather as in

the mouldy odor of worm-eaten books; "_fætore veterum liborum, a blattis

et tineis exesorum, situque prorsus corruptorum_" are Salmuth's words.

[71] _Studies in the Psychology of Sex_, vol. iii,

"Appendix B, History

VIII."

[72] _Sexuelle Osphrésiologie_, p. 106.

[73] Mantegazza, _Fisiologia dell' Amore_, p. 176.

[74] In this connection I may quote the remark of the writer of a

thoughtful article in the _Journal of Psychological Medicine_, 1851: "The

use of scents, especially those allied to the musky, is one of the

luxuries of women, and in some constitutions cannot be indulged without

some danger to the morals, by the excitement to the ovaria which results.

And although less potent as aphrodisiacs in their action on the sexual

system of women than of men, we have reason to think that they cannot be

used to excess with impunity by most."

[75] _Kama Sutra_ of Vatsyayana, 1883, p. 5.

[76] Cloquet, _Osphrésiologie_, p. 95.

[77] In Normandy the _Chenopodium_, it is said, is called "conio," and in

Italy erba connina (con, cunnus), on account of its vulvar odor. The

attraction of dogs to this plant has been noted. In the same way cats are

irresistibly attracted to preparations of valerian because their own urine

contains valerianic acid.

[78] Sonnini, _Voyage dans la Haute et Basse Egypte_, 1799, vol. i. p.

298.

V.

The Evil Effects of Excessive Olfactory Stimulation--The Symptoms of

Vanillism--The Occasional Dangerous Results of the Odors of

Flowers--Effects of Flowers on the Voice.

The reality of the olfactory influences with which we have been concerned,

however slight they may sometimes appear, is shown by the fact that odors,

both agreeable and disagreeable, are stimulants, obeying the laws which

hold good for stimulants generally. They whip up the nervous energies

momentarily, but in the end, if the excitation is excessive and prolonged,

they produce fatigue and exhaustion. This is clearly shown by Féré's

elaborate experiments on the influences of odors, as compared with other

sensory stimulants, on the amount of muscular work performed with the

ergograph.[79] Commenting on the remark of Bernardin de Saint-Pierre, that

"man uses perfumes to impart energy to his passion,"

Féré remarks: "But

perfumes cannot keep up the fires which they light."

Their prolonged use

involves fatigue, which is not different from that produced by excessive

work, and reproduces all the bodily and psychic accompaniments of

excessive work.[80] It is well known that workers in perfumes are apt to

suffer from the inhalation of the odors amid which they live. Dealers in

musk are said to be specially liable to precocious dementia. The symptoms

generally experienced by the men and women who work in vanilla factories

where the crude fruit is prepared for commerce have often been studied and

are well known. They are due to the inhalation of the scent, which has all

the properties of the aromatic aldehydes, and include skin eruptions,[81]

general excitement, sleeplessness, headache, excessive menstruation, and

irritable bladder. There is nearly always sexual excitement, which may be

very pronounced.[82]

We are here in the presence, it may be insisted, not of a nervous

influence only, but of a direct effect of odor on the vital processes. The

experiments of Tardif on the influence of perfumes on frogs and rabbits

showed that a poisonous effect was exerted;[83] while Féré, by incubating

fowls' eggs in the presence of musk, found repeatedly that many

abnormalities occurred, and that development was retarded even in the

embryos that remained normal; while he obtained somewhat similar results

by using essences of lavender, cloves, etc.[84] The influence of odors is

thus deeper than is indicated by their nervous effects; they act directly

on nutrition. We are led, as Passy remarks, to regard odors as very

intimately related to the physiological properties of organic substances,

and the sense of smell as a detached fragment of generally sensibility,

reacting to the same stimuli as general sensibility, but highly

specialized in view of its protective function.

The reality and subtlety of the influence of odors is further

shown, by the cases in which very intense effects are produced

even by the temporary inhalation of flowers or perfumes or other

odors. Such cases of idiosyncrasy in which a person-

-frequently

of somewhat neurotic temperament--becomes acutely sensitive to

some odor or odors have been recorded in medical literature for

many centuries. In these cases the obnoxious odor produces

congestion of the respiratory passages, sneezing, headache,

fainting, etc., but occasionally, it has been recorded, even

death. (Dr. J.N. Mackenzie, in his interesting and learned paper

on "The Production of the so-called 'Rose Cold,'

etc.," _American

Journal of Medical Sciences_, January, 1886, quotes many cases,

and gives a number of references to ancient medical authors; see

also Layet, art. "Odeur," _Dictionnaire Encyclopédique des

Sciences Médicales_.)

An interesting phenomenon of the group--though it is almost too

common to be described as an idiosyncrasy--is the tendency of the

odor of certain flowers to affect the voice and sometimes even to

produce complete loss of voice. The mechanism of the process is

not fully understood, but it would appear that congestion and

paresis of the larynx is produced and spasm of the bronchial

tube. Botallus in 1565 recorded cases in which the scent of

flowers brought on difficulty of breathing, and the danger of

flowers from this point of view is well recognized by

professional singers. Joal has studied this question in an

elaborate paper (summarized in the _British Medical Journal_,

March 3, 1895), and Dr. Cabanès has brought together (_Figaro_,

January 20, 1894) the experiences of a number of well-known

singers, teachers of singing, and laryngologists.

Thus, Madame

Renée Richard, of the Paris Opera, has frequently found that when

her pupils have arrived with a bunch of violets fastened to the

bodice or even with a violet and iris sachet beneath the corset,

the voice has been