Dr. Peter Szabó - Unterer Batterieweg 73 - CH-4059 Basel
Switzerland - phone: ++41 61 361 11 88
e-mail: szabo@bluewin.ch - www. weiterbildungsforum.ch
Coaching – reduced to the maximum
Paths to Solutions-The Power of the Solution-Focused Approach
- Coert Visser and Gwenda Schlundt Bodien (2008)
1. Searching for causes of problems is not necessary.
2. The change begins with defining the desired situation.
3. Each case is unique.
4. Confronting is not necessary.
5. The coachee wants to cooperate.
6. The coachee already has the solutions.
7. There are always exceptions to the problem.
8. There is always already a beginning of the desired
situation.
9. Small steps forward will usually be enough.
Like other service providers, especially in these times of rapid
change, coaches must ensure a high level of performance and
excellent results. Professionals undertaking coaching are
looking for the quickest possible success. And the personal skills
coachees can develop through coaching are among the most
sought-after qualities in the modern business world.
More than enough reason, therefore, to examine the efficiency of
the coaching process in greater detail.
198
Which factors are crucial in achieving coaching success as
simply as possible?
Which assumptions will help you to reach the goal as quickly
as possible?
Which activities should you avoid to maximize your
efficiency as a coach?
It is in response to these questions that solutionfocused brief
coaching emerges as a particularly interesting alternative to
traditional problem-solving methods.
In solution-focused brief coaching, questions are asked in such a
way as to move the coachee's attention to the level of solutions.
Instead of discussing problems, difficulties and causes, the coach
explores with the coachee desired goals , exceptions which have
led to success in the past (times when the problem did not
occur), and solutions (the changes that will have occurred once
the goal is reached) as well as existing resources .
This procedure is especially suited to the business environment,
because these coachees are already familiar with many of the
questions you will ask, eg, about defining goals and visions, best
practices, or knowledge management. But the mix of questions
is unusual, the order in which they are asked is surprising, and,
best of all, the step-by-step solutionfocused procedure is truly
unique.
Solution focused assumptions:
Becoming Solution-Focused in Brief Therapy - John Walter
& Jane Peller (1992)
1. Focusing on the positive, on the solution, and on the future
facilitates change in the desired direction. Therefore, focus on
solution-oriented talk rather than on problem oriented talk.
199
2. Exceptions to every problem can be created by therapist and
coachees, which can be used to build solutions.
3. Change is occuring all the time.
4. Small changing leads to larger changing.
5. Coachees are always cooperating. They are showing us how
they think change takes place. As we understand their
thinking and act accordingly, cooperation is inevitable.
6. People have all they need to solve their problems.
7. Meaning and experience are interactionally constructed.
8. Actions and descriptions are circular.
9. The meaning of the message is the response you receive.
10. Therapy is a goal or solution-focused endeavor, with the
coachee as expert.
11. Any change in how coachees describe a goal (solution) and/or
what they do affects future interactions with all others
involved.
12. The members in a treatment group are those who share a goal
and state their desire to do something about making it
happen.
Three stages in reaching solutions
In the first stage, coachees and coach discuss the desired future
and the changes that would be involved in reaching them. This
goal definition phase is similar to other coaching approaches.
However, particular attention is focused on the moment when
the goal is reached. The coachee describes their vision of the
future, in the greatest possible detail. In contrast, no
information is gathered about the problem.
200
In the second stage, coachees and coach discuss the recent
past, looking for early existing signs of changes in the direction
of the desired state. In this phase, the coach only asks questions
about what is already working well. This helps the coachee to
identify possible steps forward and strengthens their existing
resources.
In the third stage, coachees attempt to put into practice what
has been discussed so far. Usually, an experimental phase is
agreed upon, which involves minor changes in everyday
activities. The experiments are defined so as to focus the
coachee's attention on solutions that will work.
201
Identifying solutions rather than solving problems
In our culture, it is most common to focus on problems and their
causes, analyzing and diagnosing so that a solution can be found.
The solution-focused process dispenses with problem analysis.
Instead of focusing on understanding the problem better, the
time available is spent learning as much as possible about goals,
solutions and resources. As a rule, once coachees have put
discussing the problem behind them, they are surprised how
much they have to say about the solution. It almost feels as if
they did not have this information earlier, and only discovered it
during the conversation.
Albert Einstein is supposed to have said, 'No problem can be
solved by the same consciousness that created it'. Solution-
focused coaching thus avoids drawing attention to the problem.
It prefers to draw coachees' conscious attention to solutions.
202
The Miracle Question is typical of this process, 'Let us assume
that a miracle has happened and that your problem has been
solved. What will you then...?'
Avoiding questions about the details of the problem offers the
following advantages:
• Coaching requires less time.
• Coachees find it easier to work out appropriate solutions. The
greater the detail and the more precisely coachees speak of past
and future solutions, the more choices they realize are available
to them.
The coach can help to build the coachees solution awareness in
such a way that it is solid enough for everyday use.
• Coachees' confidence in trying out solutions is increased. The
more their resources and abilities are discussed, the easier the
situation appears, and the more motivated coachees are to put
their solutions into practice. After all, words create reality.
• Moreover , solution-oriented awareness helps coachees
increasingly to see themselves – and to behave – as experts. If
the person who is searching can find the solution themselves,
the coach only needs to help them identify options, goals,
resources, and solutions.
203
An attempt at explanation
Naturally, such a paradigm shift seems a little strange in the
beginning. It may even seem to lack what, up to now, and based
on our own experience, we have considered logical and
effective. But the solution-focused approach is the result of
empirical studies on the question, 'How does counseling work?'.
Results showed that concentrating on solutions, and only on
solutions, enabled participants to reach their goals in less time
and just as efficiently as other methods.
New theoretical findings from other fields of science support
these surprising results and make it easier to understand them.
• Chaos theory: Complex systems in an unstable balance develop
most efficiently when they control themselves. The complexity
of the influencing factors is so great that our linear way of
looking at things from the perspective of cause and effect
reaches its limits. Why not leave out the analysis and the
reduction to the causes of the problem and concentrate instead
204
on identifying the smallest changes which have led in the
desired direction, thereby becoming aware of the forces that
support them.
• Constructivism: If there is no objective reality , and if each of
us constructs our reality on the basis of our subjective
awareness, why not help our coachees to construct as helpful a
reality for themselves as possible? The Miracle Question, for
example, often helps coachees leave old and restrictive ways of
thinking behind, and develop solutions in an unencumbered and
creative manner.
The more 'exceptions' that the coachee can identify as signs of
the miracle having already begun to take shape, the more
confidence he will have in his solution constructions.
• Cybernetics: The logic of the failure of the management of
complex systems has been sufficiently investigated. It is easier
to prevent what we don't want than to achieve precisely what
we do want. Thus it is fairly simple for a coach to interrupt the
problem awareness that is preventing the solution of the
problem. Instead of doing more of the same thing that does not
work, ('try harder' problem awareness), focusing on solutions
('try something different' solution awareness) makes room for
new approaches.
Based on experience, the results are positive. Even if the
solutions do not (immediately) hit the spot, they are a step in
the right direction.
• Systems theory: Every change in any part of a system
influences the future interactions of everyone involved. If
coachees begin to describe their goals and solutions, as well as
how other people will react, differently, their relationships with
other people will also change. If coachees concentrate on
205
solutions within a system and become aware of them, useful
changes are easier to introduce and maintain.
• Communication theory: As coaches, we realise that we can
never fully and accurately understand what our coachees wish
to tell us. So, since we are anyway going to interpret
subjectively, why not assume that whatever our coachees say
about solutions makes sense? The coach should always consider
what the coachee says useful and helpful.
Investigations into very different forms of counseling have
shown that appreciative and coacheecentered coaches are
especially effective.
Practical examples – simple, but not easy
The solution-focused procedure is simple. But consistently
adopting the appropriate attitude when coaching is not.
For coaches, it requires much self-discipline to remain solution-
focused and client-ce ntered. Nevertheless, it is always a worth-
while adventure , because it helps clients find their own eff
ective solutions very quickly. Furthermore , it frees coaches
from the burden of problem-solving, thereby trustfully placing
responsibility in the hands of the true expe rt – the c lie nt!
Coaching questions reflecting the typical structure of a
solutionfocused discussion.
First stage – Expectations of the future
C: What needs to happen here today, so that later on, you will be
able to say that it was worthwhile
discussing coaching with me?
C: How would that be different for you?.
C: And how would your coachees know that you are doing
things right?
206
C: My next question may seem a little strange. It takes some
imagination to answer it. Suppose that
you go home after our meeting, that you go to bed tonight, and
that, while you are sleeping, a miracle happens. And the miracle
is, that the reason why you came here is solved – just like that!
But since you are asleep you will have no idea that the miracle is
taking place. How will you begin to discover tomorrow morning
that a miracle has happened and that you have reached all your
goals as a coach?
C: And how will your coachee know that the miracle has
happened?
C: How will you know that your coachee knows?
C: And what would you do then?
Second stage: Signs that the goal is being reached
C: Looking back over the last few days, when was there a
coaching situation in which you already felt a
little bit the way that you will feel on the morning after the
miracle?
C: How did you do that?
C: How did you know which questions you should ask ?
C: What would you say you did to make things fall into place for
her?
C: OK, great. Now, on a scale of 1 to 10, 1 being the moment you
realized that you had certain qualities as a coach, and 10 being
the morning after the miracle. Where would you place your
current coaching qualities on this scale?
C: OK, so what makes it a XX already?
C: Great. Now back to the conversation that took place last
Thursday. Where would you place your coaching on the scale?
C: And how will you realize that you have taken a step forward
and that you have reached X on the scale?
C: On a scale of 1 to 10, how confident are you that you will be
successful tomorrow?
207
Third stage: Experimental stage
C: I am very impressed by how important it is to you to let go as
a coach, and also by your ability to be truly coachee-centered. I
would like to suggest a small e xper ime nt. It will require about
a minute pe r day and will be fun. Would you like me to tell you
about it?
C: Good. Make a list which you update every evening. Let us say
for the next five days. Note down everything that happens
during your coaching meetings that you want to continue
happening in the future.
Second session
The standard focus for the second and the following sessions is
on solutions and resources that popped up
in the meantime:
• What is better? What else? What would other people say?
• How did you manage to do that?
• How can you maintain your progress?
Less coaching, greater success
A group of scientists, working with sociologists Steve de Shazer
and Insoo Kim Berg in the USA, investigated the art of reducing
counseling to the maximum very intensively and with great
success. Over the course of about twenty years, the team
examined and identified what is especially useful in coachee /
coach conversations in order to provide coachees with a
successful way of reaching their goals.
This resulted in the development of solution-focused brief
counseling, a simple procedure which leads to the rapid
identification of sustainable and effective solutions. In concrete
terms, this means that, by systematically refraining from
counseling activities that are of little use, the time investment
can be reduced to an average of three meetings, each lasting 50
minutes. This form of counseling has proved to be sustainable
208
and effective, with a success rate of 86%, as shown by studies
carried out after 6 and 18 months. This research has led to a
silent revolution in the world of therapy. The team has been
active at the Brief Family Therapy Center (BFTC) in Milwaukee
since 1978.
Additional Links
http://www.brief-therapy.org
is the original website of the founders at the BFTC in Milwaukee.
http://www.thesolutionsfocus.com
contains information on solution orientation in business
environments
http://www.reteaming.com
applies a simple solutionfocused procedure with teams
http://www.appreciative-inquiry.org
presents solutionfocused work in OD
Doing What Works: Forward in Solution-Focused Change
Blog by Coert Visser, psychologist, trainer of solution-focused
professionals. Twitter: @DoingWhatWorks
209
2.14 OSKAR
Originating from the Solutions Focused Approach the OSKAR
coaching model is a powerful framework to help your coaching
sessions focus on solutions rather than problems. Here is a brief
description of the different stages (adapted from ‘The Solutions
Focus’ by Paul Z Jackson and Mark McKergow) .
OSKAR is a framework for solution focused coaching:
1. OUTCOME:
What is the objective of this coaching?
What do you want to achieve today?
What do you want to achieve in the long term?
How will you know this coaching has been of use to you?
At this initial stage of the OSKAR coaching model you are
establishing a ‘platform’ from which to coach. Here you are
confirming that your coachee really is a customer for change, in
other words establishing that coaching them at this point in
time is going to help them. At the outset you are also clarifying:
what your coachee wants to achieve – this may be in the
long, medium and short term
what they want to achieve from the session itself and
how they will know it has been useful to them
the ‘future perfect’ in other words the perfect scenario
desired by your coachee. At this point you might want
to ask the miracle question which really helps the
210
coachee strongly visualise and in detail their desired
outcome.
2. SCALING:
On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 representing the worst it has
ever been and 10 the preferred future, where would you put
the situation today?
On a scale of 1 – 10, where 1 represents x and 10 represents
y, where are you in relation to this goal.
You are at n now; what did you do to get this far?
How would you know you had got to n+1?
Once your coachee has a clear picture of their desired outcome
you can then establish where they are already in relation to this.
Using Scaling Techniques are a very good way of helping to
quantifying this.
3. KNOW-HOW & RESOURCES:
What helps you perform at n on the scale, rather than 0?
When does the outcome already happen for you - even a
little bit?
What did you did to make that happen? How did you do
that?
What skills/knowledge/attributes do you currently have
that will help you?
When have you done this/something similar before?
What would others say is working for you?
What did you do differently?
Linking to the Scaling stage you can now build on this
foundation by establishing what positives have given the
coachee that rating – what skills, knowledge and attributes do
they currently possess which give them say a 4 or 5 rather than
a 0.This stage is all about uncovering your coachee’s strengths –
211
their knowledge, skills and attributes and building up their
awareness of these and developing confidence.
This stage really is about ‘digging for gold’ and plenty of time
should be taken to establish the resources your coachee has
available to them.
4. AFFIRM AND ACTION:
What's already going well?
What's particularly impressive so far - about strengths
and resources employed?
What is the next small step?
What would you like to do personally, straight away?
You are at n now, what would it take to get you to n+1?
Affirming - this is about providing positive reinforcement of
what you have heard…reflecting back positive comments about
some of the keys strengths and attributes your coachee has
revealed e.g. “I am impressed with the knowledge you have in
this area’ or it’s evident from what you have just said that this is
working for you.”
Action – this is about helping your coachee determine what
small action or actions they will now take.
5. REVIEW: What's better?
What did you do that made the change happen?
What effects have the changes had?
What do you think will change next?
What is better?
This final stage of the OSKAR coaching model is for reviewing
progress against actions and is therefore most likely to take
place at the beginning of the next coaching session. The
emphasis is on reviewing the positives:The positive nature of
212
this approach, coupled to the idea of scaling, makes it an
attractive model. This somehow makes the issue more tangible.
This approach is similar to the STRIDE model in that it really
focuses on the strengths of the coachees, and encourages them
to consider how they could use these strengths to address any
issues that they may have.
OSKAR offers some useful differences with other models such as
GROW.
It specifically uses the SF approach, and offers a great way
for managers and coaches to start experiencing the power
and effectiveness of SF in action
It specifically allows for know-how sharing - from other
people in the organisation and even from the coach - in
addition to the usual questioning methods
It specifically focusing on affirming and SMALL actions -
much more effective in tough real situations than attempts
to 'bust the barriers' and do everything at once
I