Genevieve and the Two Scotties by Edward Drobinski - HTML preview
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.
Chapter 12
Naïve and Baseless Inter-disciplinary Conjecture
1) Let’s make a safe assumption; that being that the Bible is worth some degree of a look. It can either be viewed as “the word of God” or the word of talented, inspired writers who wrote in a manner conducive to current readers of the time and also in anticipation of readers of the future; a future they could not see. Let’s further assume that these are two different things.
The Bible; the kind courtesy of Pexels.com under their CC0 license.
2) Recognize that our current Bible is essentially a short story collection compiled by Constantine in the fourth century.
Genevieve and the Two Scotties
Page 92
Constantine; the kind courtesy of Pexels.com under their CC0 license.
3) Also recognize that at the time of the compilation there were many other short stories which various groups adhered to which didn’t make the final cut. Even if we say that they had less literary or inspirational merit, it does seem strange that ALL
Lilith stories were omitted.
Lilith; ancient Sumerian-Assyrian terra cotta;” public domain.
4) It is not clear whether the books in the Bible were written in Sumerian or early Hebrew as the languages had similarities,
Genevieve and the Two Scotties
Page 93
though some symbols had differing meanings. To make matters more complicated, later the Greeks just had to shove their butts in the matter too.
Greek butt; the kind courtesy of Pexels.com under their CC0 license.
5) To focus on anything other than all of the aforementioned is a self-imposed limitation; unless you’d like to run the risk of being chastised for being “off topic.” ....... Ummm; the opposite seems to work too. Does anyone recall what they said about negative numbers in school? In your checking account?
Genevieve and the Two Scotties
Page 94
Possibly a hint of negative numbers; the modified kind courtesy of Pexels.com under their CC0
license.
6) Isn’t it strange that very learned people make tremendous study of a book not compiled by them?
Deuteronomically induced WTF; property of the author.
7) It has to be admitted that regardless of any “authenticity”
considerations, the readers of the Bible most often live better and kinder lives than they would have otherwise; if we merely exclude the aberrational and tactless crusades dictated by the financially fixated officialdom’s syphilitic hierarchy of the
Genevieve and the Two Scotties
Page 95
past and their demonstrated enthrallment with altar boys of the present, blessed by the Pope himself.
Pope seemingly leering; the modified kind courtesy of Pexels.com under their CC0 license.
8) Consider listening to Patti Smith’s song-poems “Constantine’s Dream” and “Seneca.”
17th century bust of “imaginary” Seneca; public domain.
9) Proceed wherever you intuition suggests.
Genevieve and the Two Scotties
Page 96
Huh?; property of the author.
Genevieve and the Two Scotties
Page 97