The living burying the dead.
[1] THE BEEHIVE.
[2] MOTHER EARTH, 1907.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Black crows: The Catholic clergy.
[5] MOTHER EARTH, December, 1909.
THE HYPOCRISY OF PURITANISM
Speaking of Puritanism in relation to American art, Mr. Gutzen Burglum said: "Puritanism has made us self-
centered and hypocritical for so long, that sincerity and reverence for what is natural in our impulses have been
fairly bred out of us, with the result that there can be neither truth nor individuality in our art."
Mr. Burglum might have added that Puritanism has made life itself impossible. More than art, more than
estheticism, life represents beauty in a thousand variations; it is, indeed, a gigantic panorama of eternal change.
Puritanism, on the other hand, rests on a fixed and immovable conception of life; it is based on the Calvinistic idea
that life is a curse, imposed upon man by the wrath of God. In order to redeem himself man must do constant
penance, must repudiate every natural and healthy impulse, and turn his back on joy and beauty.
Puritanism celebrated its reign of terror in England during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, destroying and
crushing every manifestation of art and culture. It was the spirit of Puritanism which robbed Shelley of his
children, because he would not bow to the dicta of religion. It was the same narrow spirit which alienated Byron
from his native land, because that great genius rebelled against the monotony, dullness, and pettiness of his
country. It was Puritanism, too, that forced some of England's freest women into the conventional lie of marriage:
Mary Wollstonecraft and, later, George Eliot. And recently Puritanism has demanded another toll—the life of
Oscar Wilde. In fact, Puritanism has never ceased to be the most pernicious factor in the domain of John Bull,
acting as censor of the artistic expression of his people, and stamping its approval only on the dullness of middle-
class respectability.
It is therefore sheer British jingoism which points to America as the country of Puritanic provincialism. It is quite
true that our life is stunted by Puritanism, and that the latter is killing what is natural and healthy in our impulses.
But it is equally true that it is to England that we are indebted for transplanting this spirit on American soil. It was
bequeathed to us by the Pilgrim fathers. Fleeing from persecution and oppression, the Pilgrims of Mayflower
fame established in the New World a reign of Puritanic tyranny and crime. The history of New England, and
especially of Massachusetts, is full of the horrors that have turned life into gloom, joy into despair, naturalness
into disease, honesty and truth into hideous lies and hypocrisies. The ducking-stool and whipping post, as well as
numerous other devices of torture, were the favorite English methods for American purification.
Boston, the city of culture, has gone down in the annals of Puritanism as the "Bloody Town." It rivaled Salem,
even, in her cruel persecution of unauthorized religious opinions. On the now famous Common a half-naked
woman, with a baby in her arms, was publicly whipped for the crime of free speech; and on the same spot Mary
Dyer, another Quaker woman, was hanged in 1659. In fact, Boston has been the scene of more than one wanton
crime committed by Puritanism. Salem, in the summer of 1692, killed eighteen people for witchcraft. Nor was
Massachusetts alone in driving out the devil by fire and brimstone. As Canning justly said: "The Pilgrim fathers
infested the New World to redress the balance of the Old." The horrors of that period have found their most
supreme expression in the American classic, THE SCARLET LETTER.
Puritanism no longer employs the thumbscrew and lash; but it still has a most pernicious hold on the minds and
feelings of the American people. Naught else can explain the power of a Comstock. Like the Torquemadas of ante-
bellum days, Anthony Comstock is the autocrat of American morals; he dictates the standards of good and evil, of
purity and vice. Like a thief in the night he sneaks into the private lives of the people, into their most intimate
relations. The system of espionage established by this man Comstock puts to shame the infamous Third Division
of the Russian secret police. Why does the public tolerate such an outrage on its liberties? Simply because
Comstock is but the loud expression of the Puritanism bred in the Anglo-Saxon blood, and from whose thraldom
even liberals have not succeeded in fully emancipating themselves. The visionless and leaden elements of the old
Young Men's and Women's Christian Temperance Unions, Purity Leagues, American Sabbath Unions, and the
Prohibition Party, with Anthony Comstock as their patron saint, are the grave diggers of American art and culture.
Europe can at least boast of a bold art and literature which delve deeply into the social and sexual problems of our
time, exercising a severe critique of all our shams. As with a surgeon's knife every Puritanic carcass is dissected,
and the way thus cleared for man's liberation from the dead weights of the past. But with Puritanism as the
constant check upon American life, neither truth nor sincerity is possible. Nothing but gloom and mediocrity to
dictate human conduct, curtail natural expression, and stifle our best impulses. Puritanism in this the twentieth
century is as much the enemy of freedom and beauty as it was when it landed on Plymouth Rock. It repudiates, as
something vile and sinful, our deepest feelings; but being absolutely ignorant as to the real functions of human
emotions, Puritanism is itself the creator of the most unspeakable vices.
The entire history of asceticism proves this to be only too true. The Church, as well as Puritanism, has fought the
flesh as something evil; it had to be subdued and hidden at all cost. The result of this vicious attitude is only now
beginning to be recognized by modern thinkers and educators. They realize that "nakedness has a hygienic value
as well as a spiritual significance, far beyond its influences in allaying the natural inquisitiveness of the young or
acting as a preventative of morbid emotion. It is an inspiration to adults who have long outgrown any youthful
curiosities. The vision of the essential and eternal human form, the nearest thing to us in all the world, with its
vigor and its beauty and its grace, is one of the prime tonics of life."[1] But the spirit of purism has so perverted
the human mind that it has lost the power to appreciate the beauty of nudity, forcing us to hide the natural form
under the plea of chastity. Yet chastity itself is but an artificial imposition upon nature, expressive of a false shame
of the human form. The modern idea of chastity, especially in reference to woman, its greatest victim, is but the
sensuous exaggeration of our natural impulses. "Chastity varies with the amount of clothing," and hence
Christians and purists forever hasten to cover the "heathen" with tatters, and thus convert him to goodness and
chastity.
Puritanism, with its perversion of the significance and functions of the human body, especially in regard to
woman, has condemned her to celibacy, or to the indiscriminate breeding of a diseased race, or to prostitution. The
enormity of this crime against humanity is apparent when we consider the results. Absolute sexual continence is
imposed upon the unmarried woman, under pain of being considered immoral or fallen, with the result of
producing neurasthenia, impotence, depression, and a great variety of nervous complaints involving diminished
power of work, limited enjoyment of life, sleeplessness, and preoccupation with sexual desires and imaginings.
The arbitrary and pernicious dictum of total continence probably also explains the mental inequality of the sexes.
Thus Freud believes that the intellectual inferiority of so many women is due to the inhibition of thought imposed
upon them for the purpose of sexual repression. Having thus suppressed the natural sex desires of the unmarried
woman, Puritanism, on the other hand, blesses her married sister for incontinent fruitfulness in wedlock. Indeed,
not merely blesses her, but forces the woman, oversexed by previous repression, to bear children, irrespective of
weakened physical condition or economic inability to rear a large family. Prevention, even by scientifically
determined safe methods, is absolutely prohibited; nay, the very mention of the subject is considered criminal.
Thanks to this Puritanic tyranny, the majority of women soon find themselves at the ebb of their physical
resources. Ill and worn, they are utterly unable to give their children even elementary care. That, added to
economic pressure, forces many women to risk utmost danger rather than continue to bring forth life. The custom
of procuring abortions has reached such vast proportions in America as to be almost beyond belief. According to
recent investigations along this line, seventeen abortions are committed in every hundred pregnancies. This fearful
percentage represents only cases which come to the knowledge of physicians. Considering the secrecy in which
this practice is necessarily shrouded, and the consequent professional inefficiency and neglect, Puritanism
continuously exacts thousands of victims to its own stupidity and hypocrisy.
Prostitution, although hounded, imprisoned, and chained, is nevertheless the greatest triumph of Puritanism. It is
its most cherished child, all hypocritical sanctimoniousness notwithstanding. The prostitute is the fury of our
century, sweeping across the "civilized" countries like a hurricane, and leaving a trail of disease and disaster. The
only remedy Puritanism offers for this ill-begotten child is greater repression and more merciless persecution. The
latest outrage is represented by the Page Law, which imposes upon New York the terrible failure and crime of
Europe; namely, registration and segregation of the unfortunate victims of Puritanism. In equally stupid manner
purism seeks to check the terrible scourge of its own creation—venereal diseases. Most disheartening it is that this
spirit of obtuse narrow-mindedness has poisoned even our so-called liberals, and has blinded them into joining the
crusade against the very things born of the hypocrisy of Puritanism—prostitution and its results. In wilful
blindness Puritanism refuses to see that the true method of prevention is the one which makes it clear to all that
"venereal diseases are not a mysterious or terrible thing, the penalty of the sin of the flesh, a sort of shameful evil
branded by purist malediction, but an ordinary disease which may be treated and cured." By its methods of
obscurity, disguise, and concealment, Puritanism has furnished favorable conditions for the growth and spread of
these diseases. Its bigotry is again most strikingly demonstrated by the senseless attitude in regard to the great
discovery of Prof. Ehrlich, hypocrisy veiling the important cure for syphilis with vague allusions to a remedy for
"a certain poison."
The almost limitless capacity of Puritanism for evil is due to its intrenchment behind the State and the law.
Pretending to safeguard the people against "immorality," it has impregnated the machinery of government and
added to its usurpation of moral guardianship the legal censorship of our views, feelings, and even of our conduct.
Art, literature, the drama, the privacy of the mails, in fact, our most intimate tastes, are at the mercy of this
inexorable tyrant. Anthony Comstock, or some other equally ignorant policeman, has been given power to
desecrate genius, to soil and mutilate the sublimest creation of nature—the human form. Books dealing with the
most vital issues of our lives, and seeking to shed light upon dangerously obscured problems, are legally treated as
criminal offenses, and their helpless authors thrown into prison or driven to destruction and death.
Not even in the domain of the Tsar is personal liberty daily outraged to the extent it is in America, the stronghold
of the Puritanic eunuchs. Here the only day of recreation left to the masses, Sunday, has been made hideous and
utterly impossible. All writers on primitive customs and ancient civilization agree that the Sabbath was a day of
festivities, free from care and duties, a day of general rejoicing and merry-making. In every European country this
tradition continues to bring some relief from the humdrum and stupidity of our Christian era. Everywhere concert
halls, theaters, museums, and gardens are filled with men, women, and children, particularly workers with their
families, full of life and joy, forgetful of the ordinary rules and conventions of their every-day existence. It is on
that day that the masses demonstrate what life might really mean in a sane society, with work stripped of its profit-
making, soul-destroying purpose.
Puritanism has robbed the people even of that one day. Naturally, only the workers are affected: our millionaires
have their luxurious homes and elaborate clubs. The poor, however, are condemned to the monotony and dullness
of the American Sunday. The sociability and fun of European outdoor life is here exchanged for the gloom of the
church, the stuffy, germ-saturated country parlor, or the brutalizing atmosphere of the back-room saloon. In
Prohibition States the people lack even the latter, unless they can invest their meager earnings in quantities of
adulterated liquor. As to Prohibition, every one knows what a farce it really is. Like all other achievements of
Puritanism it, too, has but driven the "devil" deeper into the human system. Nowhere else does one meet so many
drunkards as in our Prohibition towns. But so long as one can use scented candy to abate the foul breath of
hypocrisy, Puritanism is triumphant. Ostensibly Prohibition is opposed to liquor for reasons of health and
economy, but the very spirit of Prohibition being itself abnormal, it succeeds but in creating an abnormal life.
Every stimulus which quickens the imagination and raises the spirits, is as necessary to our life as air. It
invigorates the body, and deepens our vision of human fellowship. Without stimuli, in one form or another,
creative work is impossible, nor indeed the spirit of kindliness and generosity. The fact that some great geniuses
have seen their reflection in the goblet too frequently, does not justify Puritanism in attempting to fetter the whole
gamut of human emotions. A Byron and a Poe have stirred humanity deeper than all the Puritans can ever hope to
do. The former have given to life meaning and color; the latter are turning red blood into water, beauty into
ugliness, variety into uniformity and decay. Puritanism, in whatever expression, is a poisonous germ. On the
surface everything may look strong and vigorous; yet the poison works its way persistently, until the entire fabric
is doomed. With Hippolyte Taine, every truly free spirit has come to realize that "Puritanism is the death of culture,
philosophy, humor, and good fellowship; its characteristics are dullness, monotony, and gloom."
[1] THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SEX. Havelock Ellis.
THE TRAFFIC IN WOMEN
Our reformers have suddenly made a great discovery—the white slave traffic. The papers are full of these
"unheard of conditions," and lawmakers are already planning a new set of laws to check the horror.
It is significant that whenever the public mind is to be diverted from a great social wrong, a crusade is inaugurated
against indecency, gambling, saloons, etc. And what is the result of such crusades? Gambling is increasing,
saloons are doing a lively business through back entrances, prostitution is at its height, and the system of pimps
and cadets is but aggravated.
How is it that an institution, known almost to every child, should have been discovered so suddenly? How is it
that this evil, known to all sociologists, should now be made such an important issue?
To assume that the recent investigation of the white slave traffic (and, by the way, a very superficial investigation)
has discovered anything new, is, to say the least, very foolish. Prostitution has been, and is, a widespread evil, yet
mankind goes on its business, perfectly indifferent to the sufferings and distress of the victims of prostitution. As
indifferent, indeed, as mankind has remained to our industrial system, or to economic prostitution.
Only when human sorrows are turned into a toy with glaring colors will baby people become interested—for a
while at least. The people are a very fickle baby that must have new toys every day. The "righteous" cry against
the white slave traffic is such a toy. It serves to amuse the people for a little while, and it will help to create a few
more fat political jobs—parasites who stalk about the world as inspectors, investigators, detectives, and so forth.
What is really the cause of the trade in women? Not merely white women, but yellow and black women as well.
Exploitation, of course; the merciless Moloch of capitalism that fattens on underpaid labor, thus driving thousands
of women and girls into prostitution. With Mrs. Warren these girls feel, "Why waste your life working for a few
shillings a week in a scullery, eighteen hours a day?"
Naturally our reformers say nothing about this cause. They know it well enough, but it doesn't pay to say anything
about it. It is much more profitable to play the Pharisee, to pretend an outraged morality, than to go to the bottom
of things.
However, there is one commendable exception among the young writers: Reginald Wright Kauffman, whose
work, THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE, is the first earnest attempt to treat the social evil, not from a sentimental
Philistine viewpoint. A journalist of wide experience, Mr. Kauffman proves that our industrial system leaves most
women no alternative except prostitution. The women portrayed in THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE belong to the
working class. Had the author portrayed the life of women in other spheres, he would have been confronted with
the same state of affairs.
Nowhere is woman treated according to the merit of her work, but rather as a sex. It is therefore almost inevitable
that she should pay for her right to exist, to keep a position in whatever line, with sex favors. Thus it is merely a
question of degree whether she sells herself to one man, in or out of marriage, or to many men. Whether our
reformers admit it or not, the economic and social inferiority of woman is responsible for prostitution.
Just at present our good people are shocked by the disclosures that in New York City alone, one out of every ten
women works in a factory, that the average wage received by women is six dollars per week for forty-eight to
sixty hours of work, and that the majority of female wage workers face many months of idleness which leaves the
average wage about $280 a year. In view of these economic horrors, is it to be wondered at that prostitution and
the white slave trade have become such dominant factors?
Lest the preceding figures be considered an exaggeration, it is well to examine what some authorities on
prostitution have to say:
"A prolific cause of female depravity can be found in the several tables, showing the description of the
employment pursued, and the wages received, by the women previous to their fall, and it will be a question for the
political economist to decide how far mere business consideration should be an apology on the part of employers
for a reduction in their rates of remuneration, and whether the savings of a small percentage on wages is not more
than counter-balanced by the enormous amount of taxation enforced on the public at large to defray the expenses
incurred on account of a system of vice, WHICH IS THE DIRECT RESULT, IN MANY CASES, OF
INSUFFICIENT COMPENSATION OF HONEST LABOR."[1]
Our present-day reformers would do well to look into Dr. Sanger's book. There they will find that out of 2,000
cases under his observation, but few came from the middle classes, from well-ordered conditions, or pleasant
homes. By far the largest majority were working girls and working women; some driven into prostitution through
sheer want, others because of a cruel, wretched life at home, others again because of thwarted and crippled
physical natures (of which I shall speak later on). Also it will do the maintainers of purity and morality good to
learn that out of two thousand cases, 490 were married women, women who lived with their husbands. Evidently
there was not much of a guaranty for their "safety and purity" in the sanctity of marriage.[2]
Dr. Alfred Blaschko, in PROSTITUTION IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, is even more emphatic in
characterizing economic conditions as one of the most vital factors of prostitution.
"Although prostitution has existed in all ages, it was left to the nineteenth century to develop it into a gigantic
social institution. The development of industry with vast masses of people in the competitive market, the growth
and congestion of large cities, the insecurity and uncertainty of employment, has given prostitution an impetus
never dreamed of at any period in human history."
And again Havelock Ellis, while not so absolute in dealing with the economic cause, is nevertheless compelled to
admit that it is indirectly and directly the main cause. Thus he finds that a large percentage of prostitutes is
recruited from the servant class, although the latter have less care and greater security. On the other hand, Mr. Ellis
does not deny that the daily routine, the drudgery, the monotony of the servant girl's lot, and especially the fact that
she may never partake of the companionship and joy of a home, is no mean factor in forcing her to seek recreation
and forgetfulness in the gaiety and glimmer of prostitution. In other words, the servant girl, being treated as a
drudge, never having the right to herself, and worn out by the caprices of her mistress, can find an outlet, like the
factory or shopgirl, only in prostitution.
The most amusing side of the question now before the public is the indignation of our "good, respectable people,"
especially the various Christian gentlemen, who are always to be found in the front ranks of every crusade. Is it
that they are absolutely ignorant of the history of religion, and especially of the Christian religion? Or is it that they
hope to blind the present generation to the part played in the past by the Church in relation to prostitution?
Whatever their reason, they should be the last to cry out against the unfortunate victims of today, since it is known
to every intelligent student that prostitution is of religious origin, maintained and fostered for many centuries, not
as a shame but as a virtue, hailed as such by the Gods themselves.
"It would seem that the origin of prostitution is to be found primarily in a religious custom, religion, the great
conserver of social tradition, preserving in a transformed shape a primitive freedom that was passing out of the
general social life. The typical example is that recorded by Herodotus, in the fifth century before Christ, at the
Temple of Mylitta, the Babylonian Venus, where every woman, once in her life, had to come and give herself to
the first stranger, who threw a coin in her lap, to worship the goddess. Very similar customs existed in other parts
of Western Asia, in North Africa, in Cyprus, and other islands of the Eastern Mediterranean, and also in Greece,
where the temple of Aphrodite on the fort at Corinth possessed over a thousand hierodules, dedicated to the
service of the goddess.
"The theory that religious prostitution developed, as a general rule, out of the belief that the generative activity of
human beings possessed a mysterious and sacred influence in promoting the fertility of Nature, is maintained by
all authoritative writers on the subject. Gradually, however, and when prostitution became an organized institution
under priestly influence, religious prostitution developed utilitarian sides, thus helping to increase public revenue.
"The rise of Christianity to political power produced little change in policy. The leading fathers of the Church
tolerated prostitution. Brothels under municipal protection are found in the thirteenth century. They constituted a
sort of public service, the directors of them being considered almost as public servants."[3]
To this must be added the following from Dr. Sanger's work:
"Pope Clement II. issued a bull that prostitutes would be tolerated if they pay a certain amount of their earnings to
the Church.
"Pope Sixtus IV. was more practical; from one single brothel, which he himself had built, he received an income
of 20,000 ducats."
In modern times the Church is a little more careful in that direction. At least she does not openly demand tribute
from prostitutes. She finds it much more profitable to go in for real estate, like Trinity Church, for instance, to rent
out death traps at an exorbitant price to those who live off and by prostitution.
Much as I should like to, my space will not admit speaking of prostitution in Egypt, Greece, Rome, and during the
Middle Ages. The conditions in the latter period are particularly interesting, inasmuch as prostitution was
organized into guilds, presided over by a brothel Queen. These guilds employed strikes as a medium of improving
their condition and keeping a standard price. Certainly that is more practical a method than the one used by the
modern wage slave in society.
It would be one-sided and extremely sup