Biotechnology for Sustainability by Subhash Bhore, K. Marimuthu and M. Ravichandran [E - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

the seed galls to form normal healthy

nematode infestation in

agricultural

seeds. Sanitation, the use of clean tools

fields.

and equipments in field also prevent nem-

atodes infestation. Soil amendments and

6.1. Physical methods

frequent irrigation can also help to reduce

The hot water treatment, hot water

nematode-damage of crops.

drenching, rabbing with slow burning ma-

terials, soil solarization, electrical soil

6.2. Biological methods

heating, washing and cleaning of seed etc.

Biological control method of

are the most effective physical methods to

nematodes include the use of predaceous

control nematodes infestations to crops.

and parasitic organisms such as fungi,

For denamatization, rhizomes,

bacteria, protozoans, viruses, nematodes,

bulbs, corns, tubers and fleshy roots of

tardigrades, collembolans, mites etc, even

plantations and also other planting mate-

antagonistic higher plants also. This

rials are submerged into hot water for cer-

method, in fact, should be considered a

tain periods. Prior to plating the seed ma-

skillful manipulation of the biosphere

ISBN: 978-967-14475-3-6; eISBN: 978-967-14475-2-9 62

Biotech Sustainability (2017)

Management Strategies against Tiny Tigers… Gantait against nematodes pest of agricultural

safety to non-target organisms and the

fields for achieving maximum benefits.

environment as a whole and renewable

There are three types of components of

nature, the botanical pesticides offer al-

biological control of nematodes.

ternate strategy to the prevalence use of

Natural: Where the agent are al-

synthetic nematicides (Mishra, 1998). In-

ready present at levels to be sufficient for

discriminate use of chemical pesticides to

suppression of nematode development.

control nematode pest in agriculture give

Induced: The agents are already

rise to serious problems like food contam-

present in the soil and only their activities

ination, adverse effects on non-target or-

are stimulated by modifying the environ-

ganisms and environment, as well as de-

ment or by applying inciters.

velopment of pesticidal resistance in

Introduced: The agents are applied

many nematode pests. For this reason, the

by man from outside.

use of bio-pesticides of botanical origin

There are more than 50 species of

for the management of plant parasitic

predaceous fungi which have the capacity

nematodes has been increased presently.

to kill nematodes in agricultural field

Different parts of botanicals directly, the

(Jain, 2003). These fungi capture nema-

extracts of botanical parts or the product

todes by traps, mechanical traps and con-

of botanicals are used for nematode man-

stricting rings.

agement.

There are several reports of bacte-

Parts of different plants having

ria, present inside the nematode body.

nematicidal value are used directly

Pasteuria penetrans has been described

against phytonematodes, infesting various

as potential biological agent against nem-

crops (Table 2). Chopped leaves of pine-

atodes. They prevent reproduction and

apple, karanja and neem leaves etc. could

eventually kill the root-knot nematodes

be significantly reduced the root-knot,

and many other species. Some rhizospher-

reniform and other nematodes also. Vari-

ic bacteria like Azotobactor chroococcum,

ous parts of Crotolaria, marigold, Ken-

Azospirilum lipoferum, and some Pseu-

tucky blue grass etc. in powdered form

domonas spp. have found to be promising

also

reduced

nematode

population.

in reducing nematode population. Root-

Chopped castor leaves, Subabool leaves

knot nematode larvae infected with virus-

prevent gall nematodes. Chopped shots of

es were observed to exhibit sluggishness.

latex-bearing plants significantly sup-

pressed the population build up of reni-

6.3. Botanical methods

form and root-knot nematodes.

Due to their facile biodegradabil-

ity, selective toxicity only to target pests,

Table 2: Common names of some important phytonematodes

No.

Genera/Species

Common names

1.

A. fragariae

Spring dwarf nematode

2.

Anguina spp.

Seed gall, Leaf gall nematodes

3.

Anguina tritici

Ear-cockle nematode, Wheat gall nematode.

4.

Aphelenchoides besseyi

Rice white tip nematode, White tip nematode

5.

Aphelenchoides ritzemabosi

Chrysanthemum foliar nematode

6.

Aphelenchoides spp.

Bud and leaf nematodes, foliar nematodes

7.

Belonolaimus spp.

Sting nematodes

8.

Belonololaimus gracilis

Pine sting nematode

9.

Cacopaurus spp.

Sessile nematodes

10.

Criconema spp.

Spine nematodes

11.

Criconemoides citri

Citrus ring nematode

12.

Criconemoides spp.

Ring nematodes

ISBN: 978-967-14475-3-6; eISBN: 978-967-14475-2-9 63

Biotech Sustainability (2017)

Management Strategies against Tiny Tigers… Gantait Table 2 : Continued…

13.

Ditylenchus angustus

Rice nematode

14.

Ditylenchus destructor

Potato root nematode, Potato tuber nematode,

Iris nematode

15.

Ditylenchus dipsaci

Stem nematode, Tulip root nematode, Bulb

nematode

16.

Ditylenchus myceliophagus

Mushroom spawn nematode

17.

Dolichodorus spp.

Awl nematodes

18.

Dorylaimus spp.

Spear nematodes

19.

Globodera rostochiensis

Golden nematode of potato

20.

Globodera spp.

Cyst nematode

21.

Helicotylenchus spp.

Spiral nematodes

22.

Hemicriconemoides spp.

Sheathoid nematodes

23.

Hemicycliophora spp.

Sheath nematodes

24.

Heterodera avenae

Great root nematode, Cereal nematodes

25.

Heterodera cruciferae

Cabbage cyst nematode

26.

Heterodera glycines

Soybean cyst nematode

27.

Heterodera goettingiana

Pea cyst nematode, Pea root nematode, Alfalfa

root nematode

28.

Heterodera schachtii

Sugar beet nematode

29.

Heterodera spp.

Cyst-forming nematodes

30.

Hirschmanniella oryzae

Rice root nematode

31.

Hoplolaimus spp.

Lance nematode, Spear nematode

32.

Longidorus spp.

Needle nematode

33.

Meloidodera spp.

Cystoid nematode

34.

Meloidogyne arenaria

Peanut root knot nematode

35.

Meloidogyne brevicauda

Indian root knot nematode

36.

Meloidogyne exigua

Coffee root knot nematode, Brazilian root knot

nematode

37.

Meloidogyne incognita

Southern root knot nematode

38.

Meloidogyne javanica

Javanese root knot nematode

39.

Meloidogyne spp.

Root knot nematodes, Root-gall nematodes

40.

Nacobbus spp.

False root knot nematodes

41.

Paratylenchus spp.

Pin nematodes

42.

Pratylenchus spp.

Root lesions nematodes, Meadow nematodes

43.

Radopholus similis

Burrowing nematode

44.

Rhadinaphelenchus cocophilus Coconut palm nematode, Red ring nematode

45.

Rotylenchulus reniformis

Reniform nematode

46.

Rotylenchus spp.

Spiral nematodes

47.

Trichodorus spp.

Stubby root nematodes

48.

Tylenchorhynchus claytoni

Stunt nematode, Teaselate stylet nematode

49.

Tylenchorhynchus martini

Sugarcane stylet nematode

50.

Tylenchorhynchus spp.

Stunt nematode, Stylet nematode.

51.

Tylenchulus semipenetrans

Citrus root nematode

52.

Xiphenema spp.

Dagger nematodes

Certain botanicals in the form of aqueous

charantia L.; leaves of Ageratum coni-

extracts of various parts have great poten-

zoides L., Anacardium occidentale L.,

tial against nematodes, the aqueous ex-

Argemone mexicana L., Datura stramo-

tracts of fresh neem leaves; fruit skin of

nium L. etc.; aqueous root extract of Oci-

Citrus reticulata Blanco and Momordica

mum sanctum L.; seed extracts of

ISBN: 978-967-14475-3-6; eISBN: 978-967-14475-2-9 64

Biotech Sustainability (2017)

Management Strategies against Tiny Tigers… Gantait Vernonia anthelmintica Wild, Holarrhea

Quarantine principles are tradi-

antidysenterica Wall; bulb extracts of Al-

tionally employed to restrict the move-

lium sativum L. and many other plant ex-

ment of infected plant materials and con-

tracts have potentiality to prevent nema-

taminated soil into a state or country.

tode infestation in agricultural fields.

Many serious plant parasitic nematodes

Different plant products like oil

spread from one country to another and

seed cakes, oils, seeds, and various other

from one state to other. The potato cyst

formulations are extensively used for the

nematode,

Globodera

rostochiensis

management of plant parasitic nematodes.

spread from Peru to almost whole of Eu-

rope and UK through seed potatoes and

6.4. Chemical methods

gunny bags. The stem and bulb nematode,

The chemicals those are used for

Ditylenchus dipsaci got introduced in

controlling nematodes are the nemati-

southern parts of Sweden also through

cides. These are the soil fumigants, ap-

seeds. For this reason, plant quarantine

plied to the soil and diffuse through the

has been introduced at state, national and

soil as gas and acted against nematodes.

international levels as a legal restriction to

The use of nematicides for the manage-

check the spreading of nematode pest.

ment of plant parasitic nematodes in agri-

Regulatory control of pests and diseases

culture becomes essential when other

is the legal enforcement of measures to

methods are unable to protect the crops

prevent them from spreading. Strict regu-

from these pests, or spreading of nema-

lations have been made against G. rosto-

todes is so high in the field. Before plant-

chiensis and Rhadinaphelenchus cocophi-

ing, the nematicidal application in the

lus, the red ring nematode of coconut.

field in proper doses resulted in nema-

Domestic quarantine regulations have al-

tode-free rhizosphere, healthy root sys-

so been imposed to restrict the movement

tem, efficient use of minerals, moisture

of potato to prevent the spread of potato

and also reduces the chances of invasion

cyst nematode from Tamil Nadu to other

of other harmful soil microorganism.

states in India.

Kuhn (1881) first used chemical (CS2)

against Heterodera schachtii in Germany.

7. Conclusion

The discovery of DD-mixture in 1943,

EDB in 1945 and DBCP in 1954 played

The plant parasitic nematodes are

remarkable role in demonstrating the

undoubtedly the most widespread and in-

nematode damage and crop loses. The use

sidious pests of crops. The management

of methylisothiocyanate, precursor com-

practices against these hidden enemies of

pounds like daromet, methamsodium, me-

agriculture to be adopted depend upon the

thylisothiocyanate mixture like vorlex etc.

degree of infection, relative value of the

also help in controlling nematodes. The

crop, filed size, level of capital invest-

non-volatile

nematicides

like

fen-

ment, practicability and feasibility of the

sulphothion, aldicarb, carbofuran, etho-

control strategy. The cultural practices are

prop etc. are also very promisible nemati-

simple and effective methods of nema-

cides. But the use of nematicides is a

tode pest control, adopted by the farmers.

costly proposition and creates toxic haz-

Physical methods are also simple and

ards and environmental pollution. Few of

popular for management of nematode in-

them like DBCP, MBr, aldicarb etc. have

festation. The biological and botanical

been banned already. The use of nemati-

methods are eco-friendly rather than oth-

cides is not so popular in agriculture ex-

ers. Though chemical methods may create

cept in few cases where drastic spreading

health hazards and causes environmental

of nematodes occurs in the field.

pollution but for urgent need and to check

severe attack by serious nematode pests,

6.5. Regulatory methods

and when other control measures are not

ISBN: 978-967-14475-3-6; eISBN: 978-967-14475-2-9 65

Biotech Sustainability (2017)

Management Strategies against Tiny Tigers… Gantait so fruitful, the chemical methods may be

Jairajpuri, M. S. and Ahmad, W.

adopted against these noxious pests of

(1992). Dorylaimida: Free-living,

various crops. For sustainable develop-

Predaceous and Plant parasitic

ment of agriculture, a combination of dif-

Nematodes . Oxford and IBH Pub-

ferent management systems integrated in

lishing Company Private Limited,

the correct manner can help to manage

New Delhi. pp. 458.

the nematode problems.

Jairajpuri, M. S., Alam, M. M. and

Ahmad,

I.

(1990) .

Nematode

Acknowledgement

biocontrol: Aspects and Prospects.

CBS Publishers and Distributors,

I am thankful to Dr. Kailash

Delhi, India. pp. 155.

Chandra, Director, Zoological Survey of

Kuhn, I. (1881). Die Ergebnisse der

India, Kolkata for providing facilities and

versuche zur Ermittelung der ursach

encouragement to prepare this article.

der Ruben mudigkeit und zur

Erforschung

der

Natur

der

References

nematode . Ber physiol. Lab. Univ.

Halle 3, 1-53.

Ayoub, S. M. (1980). Plant Nematology:

Lal, A. (1998). Application of computers

An Agricultural Training Aid. Nema

in nematode identification. In: Re-

Aid Publication. USA. pp. 195.

cent Advances in Plant Nematology.

Bohra, P. and Baqri, Q. H. (1997). Plant

Trivedi, P. C. (ed.). CBS Publishers

and soil nematodes. State fauna

and Distributors, Daryaganj, New

Series

6;

Fauna

of

Delhi,

Delhi, pp. 107-114.

Zoological Survey of India 75-108.

Mathur, B. N., Handa, D. K. and

Bohra, P. and Baqri, Q. H. (2004). State

Swarup, G. (1987). Effect of deep

Fauna Series 8, Fauna of Gujarat

summer ploughings on the cereal cyst

(Part-2). Zoological Survey of India

nematodes, Heterodera avenae and

355-400.

yield of wheat in Rajasthan, India. In-

Cobb, N. A. (1914). North American

dian Journal of Nematology 17, 292-

free-living fresh water nematodes.

295.

Transactions of the American Mi-

Mishra, S. D. (1998). Botanicals in the

croscopical Society 33, 35-100.

management of plant parasitic nem-

Cobb, N. A. (1917). The mononchs

atodes. In: Recent advances in plant

(Mononchus, Bastian): a genus of

nematology. Trivedi, P. C. (ed.).

free-living nematodes. Soil Science

CBS Publishers and Distributors,

3, 431-486.

New Delhi. pp. 226-246.

Crofton, H. D. (1966). Nematodes.

Nicholas, W. L. (1984). The biology of

Hutchinson

University

Library,

free-living nematodes . Clarendon

London. pp. 160.

Press, Oxford, Second Edition. pp.

Hugot, J. P., Baujard, P. and Morand,

251.