The Deception Of Allah by Christian Prince - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

Image 1

As an Arab Christian growing up in the Middle East, I learned the hard way about the truth by firsthand experience. Truth can be shared in books and documents but nothing is comparable when living it daily.

When I was a child at school, I was told by my Muslim teachers during classroom that anyone who is not a Muslim, is dirty. The teacher had given me his own proof, taken straight from the Qur’an, that all Jews are either pigs or monkeys: “Say should I tell you about an evil as judgment from Allah, the one


Allah curses him, and being angry of them, and made from them monkeys and

pigs those who worshipped evil;- these are worse in position, and far more

astray from the right path!”Al-Maeda,

Chapter # 5, Verse # 60). In such culture, you have one of two choices: either you decide to be part of it, either you decide to find the truth. Who in the world is going to believe that God the

Almighty transformed Jews into pigs and monkeys because they went fishing on a Saturday? That story made me question the legitimacy of the Qur’an.

It doesn't make sense that Allah, which Muslims claim is the most just god, is going to turn someone into a pig and monkey for trying to feed his children.

Especially after reading the

interpretation of the story which states that Allah purposely caused the fish to disappear during an entire week except for Saturday as it then reappeared. This means Allah made the Jews starve, on top of punishing them for trying to survive which is a contradiction to Qur’an 5:3 “But if any is forced by hunger, with no inclination to transgression, Allah is indeed Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful (Yusuf Ali translation).

Many questions came to my mind since hearing that story.

Why doesn’t Allah turn the killers, rapists and thieves into pigs and monkeys instead of the ones fishing on a Saturday?

Consequently, it’s what made me study Islam in addition to all the accusation Muslims had against my belief as a Christian. I worked hard reading as much as I could in order to learn and

educate myself. After graduating from high school, I decided to study the Islamic law which would qualify me to work as a lawyer or as a judge in any Islamic state. As a matter of fact, the degrees I have are not what made me knowledgeable about Islam, rather it was the hard work and many years of researching the Islamic

books. There came a point where I felt it was my time to inform people, with my help and knowledge, inform them of the truth

about Islam. I hope that whoever is going to read both volumes of The Deception of Allah as well as my upcoming books will find the answers which are

“politically incorrect” to his and her questions.

John 8:32

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”


Christian Prince

Qur'an "plus they deceived and Allah deceived

and Allah is the best of deceivers" Qur'an 3:54


“For many deceivers have gone out into the

world, those who do not confess the coming of

Jesus Christ in the flesh. Such a one is the

deceiver and the antichrist.” 2 John 1:7


A Tree and Its Fruit

“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in

sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous

wolves.” Matthew 7:15


This book is in two volumes.

Volume 1 addresses things you need to know about Islam Volume 2 exposes the “miracles” of the Qur'an iii

The Deception of Allah Volume 1

A Book Muslim's Do Not Want You To Read


"Why do they not understand the Qur'an? If it's not from Allah, they will find many contradictions in it?" (Qur'an 4:82) This is an important verse that we will use as a scale to examine the Qur’an. As long as Allah himself created this rule to examine, whether it's a book of god or not, Muslims have to accept the rules of Allah and his way of examination! If we find contradictions in the Qur’an, it cannot be from the real God as the verse says.

Let us see the Muslims’ claims, and expose the contradictions of the Qur'an. We will also expose the Muslims’ false claims on regards to their so-called scientific miracles.


On Harun Yahya's websites ( and, Mr. Harun has made numerous claims about the Qur’an.

I will show the readers inside The Deception of Allah Volume 1 and 2, how each of these claims are false, and that Mr. Harun's false claims were meant to intentionally deceive. The following points are some of his claims from his website. In this book, I will also expose the real meaning of these verses of the Qur’an, of which Mr. Harun is trying to scam readers. I am going to put all of his claims on regards to astronomical science in one section, for all the claims are connected. Before I move on to that, I need to give you an introduction about Islam and Muhammad.

Islam is an establishment based on three important names: 1. Allah is the god and he has ninety-nine names 2. Angel Jibreel (Gabriel), whom Muslims say is the Holy Spirit (but this claim is never made in the Qur'an)

3. Muhammad is the prophet of Islam, he is the Seal of Allah's Prophets (of a

3. Muhammad is the prophet of Islam, he is the Seal of Allah's Prophets (of a claimed 124,000 prophets).


• Allah is the god of the two worlds (mankind and jinn), but somehow, Allah forgot about the angels! It's because they are not from these two worlds!

• Allah sent 124,000 Muslim prophets

• Book of Tu'afat Al-'Abib 'Ala Shar'h Al-'Khatib, p. 431, 432)

• Muslims are the hypocrites (Qur’an 4:142)

• All of Allah's books are corrupted, except for the Qur’an (Qur'an 4:46)

• Muhammad is the last prophet (Qur'an 33:40)

• Beheading nonMuslim captives (Qur'an 8:67; 47:4)

• Allah has no sons (Qur'an 4:171)

• Angels in Islam cannot be named after females; only nonMuslims do so (Qur’an 53:27)

• Allah has no girlfriend (until the time of Muhammad), (Qur'an 6:101; 72:3)

• Allah has only ONE leg (a single shin) (Qur'an 68:42)

• Allah’s two hands are both on his right side (Allah has no left hand), (Qur'an 49:1). Note: Based on Islamic teachings, the left hand is the defiled one (e.g.

used for toilet). Only Satan has and uses the defiled (left) hand (Sahih Muslim, Book 023, Hadith 5007). Allah cannot have a defiled hand; therefore Allah’s two hands must be right (undefiled) hands

• Allah has a face (Qur'an 55:27)

• Allah does not like to have female children (Qur'an 53:21-22)

• Allah knows everything, as long as you do not ask him questions and no one is allowed to ask him questions (Qur'an 5:101-102)

• Muslims cannot take the non-believers (nonMuslims) as friends (Qur'an 3:28; 4:139; 5:51, 57, 81)

• Satan is a friend for all non-believers (nonMuslims), (Qur'an 7:27; 30)

• Non-believers are friends to each other only, but not to Muslims (Qur'an 8:73)

• Muslims cannot even take their own family as friends if they are from the non-believers (nonMuslims), (Qur'an 9:23)

• Allah sent a prophet to every nation, but yet Muslims cannot name one prophet for nations such as China, India, Japan, etc. (Qur'an 10:47; 16:36, 84, 89; 23:44)

• Allah sent a prophet to every nation speaking to them in their own language (Qur'an 14:4). I wonder what the book of Allah is in the Russian language?

• Qur'an is the holy book of the Muslims. It has two kinds of commandments: ones which are valid to practice and others which are abrogated. Abrogated means the verses are either there or missing, but Muslims are not allowed to practice them anymore (Qur'an 2:106)

• Allah will abrogate all the satanic verses from the Qur’an (Qur’an 22:52)

• The Kaaba is nothing more than a way to identify who is a Muslim and who is not by the direction of their prayers (Qur'an 2:143) which means the Kaaba is not a holy house as mentioned in Qur’an 5:97

• The dead people are not equal to the living ones (Qur'an 35:22). We must then conclude that Muhammad is not equal to Jesus as Jesus is alive while Muhammad is dead!

• The ones who die for the sake of Allah are alive (Qur'an 2:154)

• Allah is the best of deceivers

(Qur'an 3:53; 7:99; 8:30; 10:21; 27:50)

• To Allah is all the ownership, and he is the Master of Deception (Qur’an 13:42)

• There is no guidance for the one Allah deceives (Qur’an 4:143; 6:39, 125; 7:178, 186; 13:27; 16:37, 93)

• Allah might deceive and mislead the one he has already guided! (Qur’an 9:115; see Tafsir Al-Jalalayn transl. Feras 'Hamza, and Tafsir Ibn-Kathir, Vol. 2, p. 395


• Allah will make an ugly behavior look like beauty to the infidels in order to make them go further astray! (Qur’an 6, Verse 137)

• The females are not equal to the males (Qur’an 3:36)

• Muslim men can beat their wives (Qur'an 4:34; 38:44)

• Muslim men can marry up to four women at the same time and have intercourse with an unlimited number of slaves outside of marriage (Qur’an 4:3)

Image 2

Image 3

• Muslim men can rape a married slave woman (Qur'an 4:24)

• Muslim men can rape their wives and force them into bed anytime, anywhere and at any circumstances (Qur'an 2:223)


If we ask Muslims who Allah is, they will reply that God is the Creator, the All-Knowing. Their answer is not that much different from the answer we get from everyone else’s about their god, but when it comes to the god Allah, there are lots of problems and we will go over them.

Before we can understand the person of Allah, we need to understand his name first. Muslims try to make us believe that Allah is the same as the God of Christianity and of Moses. They even try to convince us that Allah is an Aramaic word and that Jesus used it when he spoke in Aramaic. How true is this claim?

When the movie “ The Passion of the Christ” came out some years ago, Muslims took clips from the movie in which Jesus spoke Aramaic saying the name of God. They then used those clips to create their own videos in order to prove their claims that the name Allah, is indeed Aramaic. The Aramaic word they were trying to adopt is Elah, El not Al like Allah.

Here’s a quick and easy study in Qur'an 4:125:

In Qur’an

4:125, there are two words for Allah, but they do not have the same meaning.

If you don’t know Arabic, you will not notice much difference between both words to the exception of one letter, but actually their difference is much more than that.

Allah and Lil away from Lillah, that leaves us with lah (god), a word that is common to both names. In fact, Lah was the name for the moongod, the main Egyptian god and a god being worshiped by the Arabs. In English, Lillah

translates to to god and Allah translates to the god.

Image 4

Image 5

As you can see from the above illustration, although Lillah and Allah are each written as one word in Arabic, Lil and Al are not part of the word Lah itself—

that is Lillah and Allah are each made up of two words. Again, Lillah is to god and Allah is the god.

In Arabic, Al is always equal to “the” and it is attached to names which are attributed to god only. This is why all the 99 names of Allah start with Al or

“the” . Take note however, that “the” is not part of the name. It is just a language tool used to indicate that the name is unique to god; only god can be given this distinction as long as it’s a name, not a description. For example, we cannot say

“The Muhammad,” because Muhammad is just a name for a person. Note that the names of the goddesses Al-Lat and Al-'Uza are very similar to Allah’s name as both begin with Al because they are deities.

It is interesting to note that the Messiah is called Al-Maseeh in the Qur’an. It means he is the only Messiah in the whole world. He is the only man in the Qur’an who has Al or “the” attached to his name.


Allah wants sons NOT daughters, as seen in Qur'an 53:19-22: 19 Did you see Al-Lat and Al-'Uza

20and Manat the third one?

21What for you the male gender ones and to Allah the females?

22This is a really unjustified division.

I’ve never heard of a god saying such a thing before. First, Allah says it is unfair for him to have daughters (Al-Lat, Al-‘Uza, and Manat) instead of sons. Second, it is unfair that the Arabs get sons—“for you the males and for me the

Image 6

it is unfair that the Arabs get sons—“for you the males and for me the females”—while he gets only daughters. Now think about it. Allah is complaining that Arabs are more blessed than he is, because they are blessed with sons, while he only gets daughters. Isn’t Allah the Creator? Why doesn’t he bless himself with sons? Qur'an 6:101 (Muhammad Pickthall translation) explains why:

The Originator of the heavens and the earth! How can He have a child, when there is for Him no consort, when He created all things and is aware of all things?

Qur’an 6:101 is a question about how Allah is supposed to have a son if he never had a girlfriend! Allah cannot have sons because how can he have a son when he hath no girlfriend?

As long as this is the answer Muslims give to Christians about why Allah cannot have a son, it only shows that Allah has a very wrong idea about what Christians believe. No Christian believes that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was the girlfriend of God.

This complete misunderstanding proves to me that Allah cannot be the same as the God of Christians; not only because Allah does not know what Christians believe, but also because he thinks that he is the same as any man—that he cannot have children unless he has a woman with whom to have sex and procreate. This alone tells me that the one who created Qur’an 6:101 was speaking from the mentality of a man, not God—a man who is sure that if he does not have a woman, then he cannot have children. He tried to speak for God, but he can only speak within his limits as a man.


As I have shown you in Qur’an 6:101:

To Him is owed the foundation of the heavens and the earth: How can? He has a son when He hath no girl friend. He created all things, and He hath top knowledge of all things.

Allah cannot have children unless he has a woman to have sex with and yet, the Qur’an also tells us that Mary was a virgin when she became pregnant with Jesus

Image 7

Image 8

Qur’an also tells us that Mary was a virgin when she became pregnant with Jesus (or 'Isa, as He is called in the Qur’an). Qur'an 3:47 tells us: She (Mary) said, “My God, how I am going to have a son when no man had intercourse with me.” He said, “This is how Allah creates. He says 'be' and it would be!”

Regarding this verse, Muslims will tell you that it was the angel Gabriel, or Jibreel, who was talking to Mary. (Remember that we are not discussing the same story that is in the Bible. We’re following the story in the Qur’an. Don’t mix them up.) Muslims will also tell you that Mary was actually speaking with the Holy Spirit who appeared to her in the form of angel Jibreel. What they will not tell you is that the Qur’an never named angel Jibreel as the one who spoke to Mary.

Let’s review the verse 47 carefully:

She (Mary) said, “My God, how I am going to have a son when no man had intercourse with me.” He said, “This is how Allah creates. He says 'be' and it would be!”

This verse presents us with another proof that the Qur’an is man-made. Notice the following:

Mary called the Holy Spirit (who appeared to be a man, (see

Qur’an 19:17) “My God” (RABY), but he told her that he is only a messenger, not God (see Qur’an 19:19).

As long as Mary called the Holy Spirit “My God,” in Qur’an 3:47 and assuming that he was Allah, why was he talking about himself in the third person—that is, why did he say, “This is how Allah creates,” instead of, “This is how I create”?

Did Mary make a mistake when calling the Holy Spirit “My God;” or was it actually Allah? Either way, nowhere does it say in the Qur’an that the one who

Image 9

actually Allah? Either way, nowhere does it say in the Qur’an that the one who spoke to Mary was the angel Jibreel (Gabriel), and nowhere in the Qur’an does it say that the angel Jibreel is the Holy Spirit;

In Qur’an 3:45 we read:

And recall when the angels said: “O Mary! Lo! Allah gives thee joyful tidings of a word from him. Whose name is the Christ Jesus, son of Mary, glorious in the world and the Hereafter, and nearer unto Allah;”

Notice here it says, “angels said,” but in Qur’an 19:16 we read that one spirit became a perfect man! Therefore there is a clear mistake because if the angel is one angel, and he is the Holy Spirit, and he is the one who brought the news, and he spoke as a singular person, then why in Qur’an 3:45 did all the angels talk?

Are they all the Holy Spirit too?

This would mean that the Holy Spirit is holy spirits. However, this contradicts another story of the announcement which we find in Qur’an 19:16-21. See Qur’an 19:17:

So she

(Mary) screened herself from them. So we send to her our spirit, who appeared to her as a normal man.

As we see, it’s one spirit which became one man. Moreover, Muslims claim that the Holy Spirit is one person and it’s the angel Jibreel. Most Muslims translate the word spirit into “angel”. These are incorrect and false translations.

Note that the Holy Spirit is called God by Mary, but at the same time, the Holy Spirit is talking about himself as a messenger of God. The Holy Spirit says in Qur’an 19:19:

I am only a messenger from your Lord, to announce to thee the gift of a holy son.

In the Qur’an Why can't the Holy Spirit be the angel Jibreel? To find out we read Qur’an 16:2:

He dispatches down the angels with the Ruh (Spirit) of His Command to whom of His slaves He wills, saying, “none has the right to be worshiped but I, so protect yourself from me.”

Allah will send the angels with the Spirit. This means the angels cannot be the Spirit.

Muslims try to translate the word Ruh,



, as “revelation”, which is a lie and a


Muhammad Pickthall’s translation shows the truth about Qur’an 16:2, as seen in the following:

He sendeth down the angels with the Spirit of His command unto whom He will of His bondmen, (saying), “Warn mankind that there is no Allah save Me, so keep your duty unto Me.”

There is further evidence in Qur’an 26:192-193:

192 Verily these are scriptures from the Lord of the two Worlds (world of mankind, and Jinn).

193With it, came down with it, the Faithful spirit.

Again, Allah is not saying it came down with Jibreel? Is it just a word? Why didn't Allah make it clear if it's that angel?

Qur'an 70:4 reads:

The angels and the spirit, rise up unto him (Allah), in a Day which is identical to fifty thousand years of your years.

If the angels are the spirit, why is Allah saying that they go up to him, angels AND the spirit? Qur'an 78:38 says:

1. In that day (Judgment day) the Spirit and the angels will line up in ranks, and not one of them shall talk except by Allah's order Most Gracious, and He speaks correct.

2. Again, Allah is saying they will stand next to each other, in ranks, Spirit and the angels. This is proof that Muslims are quite confused. I do not blame them. If their prophet is the last to have answers, then why shall they have one?

Why doesn't Allah say in the Qur’an in clear words that the messenger sent to Mary was an angel named Jibreel, instead of all this confusion? For instance, the Bible states in clear words that it is an angel, as we read in in Luke 1:19?

And the angel answering said unto him, I am Gabriel, that stand in the presence

Image 10

of God; and am sent to speak unto thee, and to shew thee these glad tidings.

It is funny that there are many verses in the Qur’an, like Qur'an 7:52, which claims that it is a very clear book.

For We had definitely sent unto them a Book, based on wisdom which We explained it to them in clear details, as a guide and a mercy to people who believe.

At the same time, Qur’an 3:7 clearly states that the Qur’an has two parts. The first part is clear, and the other one is not only vague but it also indicates that no one except Allah knows its meaning; “but no one knows the Qur’an’s real meaning except Allah.”

Who was Muhammad? His real name,

ﻖ , Qathem

The following chart provides the basic data on Muhammad.

When was He


Muhammad was born in the year 570, which is four years after his named father, Abduallah, died! Some might say, “How can a child be born four (4) years after

Image 11

Abduallah, died! Some might say, “How can a child be born four (4) years after his father's death?” The answer is simple. Abduallah was called his father, but he was not.

Before Islam, there was a kind of marriage they called Zawaj Al Rahe’t, which means group marriage. This is how the marriage worked: The woman sleeps with many men, seven, ten, or more. The number doesn’t matter much. All are called Raht or Groups. You could say it's not marriage at all. It was more of a sex practice accepted by the society. The mother then chose the father of her baby when she gave birth.

The real name of Muhammad's designated father was never Abduallah. His real name was Abd Allat, which means the slave of Allat (one of the three daughters of the pagan deity, Allah). Muslims only use the name Abduallah as his father's name because the actual name of his father is insulting to Allah.

I could go into great details about Muhammad's childhood, but that is not the point of my book, although I will give some short references to prove this point about Muhammad's birth.

Muhammad’s mother had many children, not only Muhammad. If the first and only individual man who ever had her was Muhammad's father, how does she have so many children? In the Book of Imam Al Suyuti the Al Kasa’s Al-Kubra, Vol. 1, p. 132, 133, 134,135 Muhammad’s mother said: I was

pregnant with him, and it was the easiest one of my pregnancies.

No one speaks about his brothers. How can he have brothers, since Muslims claim that Muhammad never saw his father? And his mother, she was newly married? Add to that, Muhammad’s father died a few months after he married her (as Muslims claim). The only way is if his mother would have had other husbands, or at least one other.

There are many stories we can tell, but I will try not to make things complicated.

In the coming hadith, I will clearly prove that the father of Muhammad (the claimed one, Abduallah never married Muhammad's (Qathem's) mother. I am going to show the story as it is in Arabic, and translate it, for I know the Muslims will say, “No way could this be found in our books!” Not only that, I will give a link to the biggest Islamic website for books on the net.

Image 12

Image 13

will give a link to the biggest Islamic website for books on the net.

The Book of Al Sirah Al-Halabia (another name of the Book of Insan Al-Ueoun Fe Serat Al-Ma'mun), Vol. 1, p. 128:

After the death of Qathem Ibn Abd-Al-Mu'taleb (Muhammad's uncle) at the age of nine, three years before Muhammad was born, his father Abd-Al-Mu'taleb felt so sad, so when the prophet was born, he named him Qathem.

Website for hadiths from Islamic books:




ﺐ -ن

ﻮ #SR1

Excerpt of

the hadith translation: Book of Al-Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Print. 1, 1968, Vol. 1, p.

95, 96:

Obed Allah told us that (…) it was Waraqa Ibn Naofal's sister on the road looking for men. As she looked, she did not like any until she saw Abduallah (Muhammad's father) walk by. She said to him, holding him from his clothes,

“What do you think about my goods?” (Get what you need from me.) He said,

“Not now. When I am back!” He went out fast and entered to Amena Bent Wahab (Muhammad's mother) and had sex with her. On his way back, he came to meet with Waraqa Ibn Naofal's sister and said to her, “You’d still like to sleep

Image 14

to meet with Waraqa Ibn Naofal's sister and said to her, “You’d still like to sleep with me!” She said, “No! When you walked by, before you left me, I saw a shiny face, but now you have lost that shiny face.” (Maybe he got tired from sex.)

We can find the same story in the book entitled, Alsyrah Al-Nbwyah Le-Ibn-Hisham (Arabic), Printing 2.02, Vol. 1, p. 292, Author: Ibn Hisham Al-’Ansaary/’Abd Allah bin Yusuf:

The hadith translation of the above book, Chapter of Woman Offering Herself For Nukah (sex) to Abduallah Ibn Abd-Al-Mu'taleb (Muhammad’s father): Ibn Ishaq said: “Then Abd-Al-Mu'taleb (Muhammad’s Grandfather) left, and he took with him Abduallah, at the same time they passed by a woman, she is from the family of Assad son of 'Uza son of 'Qusai son of Dogs (dogs was the name of Muhammad’s early grandfather) son of Murah son of Ka'eb son of Lu'e son of Galeb son of Faher.” She said when she saw his face: “Where are you going Abduallah?” He said, “With my father,” then she said, “I will give you the same number of camels as was offered in the day of Sacrifice (100 camels) if you sleep with me.” He said, “I cannot now, I am with my father. I cannot leave him.”

Now as we study this story, it tells us that women at that time had full control of their lives. They slept with whoever they liked, and they offered themselves to any man of their choice. Did you notice in the first version that Muhammad's claimed father did not say no to the deal, but he had a rendez-vous with Muhammad's (Qathem's) mother? He wanted to have sex with Waraqa Ibn Naofal's sister, but when he came back, she changed her mind. Why?!

This proves that the word marriage had no meaning at that time. As I said and

Image 15

This proves that the word marriage had no meaning at that time. As I said and have proven, Muhammad's father practiced this kind of open sexual relationship.

I am wondering what was the relationship between Waraqa Ibn Naofal and Muhammad’s mother prior to his birth? I would not be surprised if Waraqa Ibn Naofal is the real father of Muhammad. I do not think this story came to life from nothing. In those days, Arabs used to offer their sisters or daughters for their own purposes. Maybe Waraqa Ibn Naofal tried to prevent Muhammad’s father from having sex with Amena because she was a favorite of his! Perhaps he sent his sister on this mission! Had it worked, he (Muhammad’s father) would have been hooked up with the sister instead of that woman.

On the same page of the above hadith, we find the following: Fatima Bint Mur was among the most beautiful women and most noble with honor. She read books and was educated! All the young men of the Qurish tribes talked about her. The story says that she saw the light of prophet-hood in his face!

She offered Muhammad's father to sleep with her for the payment of one hundred camels!!

How decent was Muhammad's father to the point that women offered him money for sex! I am not talking about how good he was, but as in pleasant looking.

What I mean is that an honorable man would not be jumping from one woman to another or even get paid for sex like a prostitute. In today’s modern times, he would be considered a gigolo.

The reason I am pointing out these stories is to give you some background about the daily life of the Arab tribes of Qurish at that time. I want to make it clear that, when Muslims speak about Muhammad's family as being a noble family, it does not match the reality. Don't forget that Muhammad's parents were on top of all of this, and they were pagans and died as such. And going back to the Qur’an we found that Allah called the pagans “filthy” as mentioned in Qur’an 9:28: “O

ye who believe! Truly the Pagans are unclean; so let them not, after this year of theirs, approach the Sacred Mosque. And if ye fear poverty, soon will Allah enrich you, if He wills, out of His bounty, for Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.” (Translation of Yusuf Ali).

Image 16

Image 17

In the Book of Al-Rahi'q Ma'khtom, p. 45, his uncle 'Hamza was sharing the same breast feeding women (two women breastfed 'Hamza). Later on, both same women breastfed Muhammad. The names of the two women were Thaubia and

'Halima Al-Sadia.


And his uncle 'Hamza was a person who was breastfed from the family of Bany Sa'ed son of Baker, and his mother ('Hamza’s mother), breastfed Muhammad while he was being suckled by 'Halima, therefore 'Hamza was breastfed and shared by both women who were also suckled by Muhammad.

After this brief introduction of Muhammad's life, it's time to shed the light on this man in order to figure out who he was, not as a name, but as a person and a man. Muhammad had his own experience as a human. His early life was not easy until he got his hand on wealth.

Let us recall the first story about how Waraqa’s sister, by the name of Qatilah Bin Naofal, offered herself to Abduallah in order for him not to have sex with Amena, but he did anyway. Therefore, Waraqa’s sister did not want him anymore. If we connect this with other stories, we will find that Waraqa Ibn Naofal is in every step of Muhammad's life. In the same book (Book of Al-Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Print. 1, 1968, Vol. 1, p. 95), it says that Muhammad: Abd Al-Mu'taleb Ibn Hashem and his son Abd-Allah married on the same day, so Halah daughter of Waheb gave birth to 'Hamza, who became Muhammad's uncle and his brother by breast feeding (Muslims believe that if two suckle from the same woman, they become brothers), and we had been told by Ibn Ishaq that when the father of Muhammad married Amena (Muhammad’s mother) he stayed with her three nights, as was the tradition at that time.

Image 18

with her three nights, as was the tradition at that time.

Continuing on the same page, we find that the grandfather of Muhammad and his son had sex with two sisters, Amena and Halah. Technically speaking, Muhammad's aunt is his grandfather's woman, or we can call her his wife. On top of that, it says that Halah gave birth to 'Hamza (Muhammad's uncle). This means both Muhammad and 'Hamza were breastfed by the mother of 'Hamza.

That made 'Hamza, the uncle of Muhammad, also his brother (by suckling the same woman's milk), but not in the same time period (year). Add to that, Muhammad's father slept only with Muhammad's mother for three days! He even slept with her in her house! How can she be his wife? Why didn't he, if they were married, take his wife to his house?! This means that Muhammad's mother never moved into Abduallah's house!!

In the Book of Ibn Kathir, Vol. 1, p. 255, Ibn Hisham said that Muhammad was 14 or 15 years old when the battle of Al-Fajar had begun.

We find the same story from the Book Al-Sira Al-Naboiah, by Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Mahmoud Hasabalah (this is his entire name) and Dr. Muhammad AbduAlqader Al-'Khateb. Both are professors of Islamic history and civilization in Al Azhar University (the highest university accepted by Osama bin Laden, Al-Zawahiri and Muslims).

They both say in their book that the battle of Al-Fajar started 12 years after the death of Abd-Al-Mu'taleb, the father of 'Hamza, and that 'Hamza was 22 years old at that time!!!

In the same book, both doctors agree that Muhammad, at that time, was 15 years old when the war of Al-Fajar had begun. Below is the link for their book. I know Muslims will not believe this. Let us say 99% of Muslims never read books, so how would they know?

Visit this link and see for yourself:,




If 'Hamza was 22 at the time of war and Muhammad was 15, this means that, according to these scholars, 'Hamza is seven years older than Muhammad. But

'Hamza was born in the same year Muhammad's father died! This would mean

Image 19

Image 20

Image 21

'Hamza was born in the same year Muhammad's father died! This would mean that Muhammad was born seven years after his father’s death.

The Book

of Sira Ibn Kathir, Vol. 1, p. 263 says:

When Muhammad wanted to marry Khadija, he told his uncle about her and

'Hamza went to Khadija and asked for her hand for Muhammad.

In Arab traditions as I know our traditions very well, you do not ask someone of your own age to go on your behalf asking for someone's hand. It's not at all acceptable. In this case, 'Hamza fits in both ways to do the job: He is Muhammad's uncle and he is older.

Now we will find out when reading in the Book of Da'ert Al-Ma-Ma'aref Al-Islamyiah, Vol. 29, p. 9112 , that Muhammad was born in the year 570 AC and the battle of 'Ohod was in the year 625, as all Islamic books agree.

This means that if we take the year 625 ('Ohod Battle) and substract 570 (his birth date) = 55 years (The age of Muhammad).

In the Book of Al-Tabakat Al Kubra, Vol. 3, p. 29/118,

'Hamza held the flag in the attack against the children of Qanika'a (the Jewish tribe who were all killed by Muhammad) and when he died, his age was 59.

Here, 'Hamza was older than the prophet by 4 years.

Image 22

Image 23

Image 24

Image 25


Muslims might say I am making things up. This can be found in many Islamic books such as:

If 'Hamza was four years older than the messenger of Allah, then how [could he]

be suckling from the same woman? The answer is, the hadith is correct and has been favored above other hadiths because she breastfed them both in two different timing.

Al-Mustadark Fe Al-Sahih, Vol. 3, p. 212, Hadith 4873:

'Hamza used to have two names, Abu-'Ali and 'Emarah. He became a Muslim six years after Islam started and he was four years older than Muhammad. He was killed in battle of 'Ohod, Saturday the seventh of the month of Shoual (Islamic calendar).

Book of Al-Tabaqat Al-Kubra, print. 1, 1968, Vol. 3, p. 103:

“'Hamza, may Allah have mercy on him, was killed by a man named Wahshy, he was fifty nine years old and four years older than the prophet.”

What do we obtain from all of these stories?

If Muhammad's grandfather and his father slept with the same sisters in the same time period, and after that Muhammad's father left Amena a few days later, (or

Image 26

time period, and after that Muhammad's father left Amena a few days later, (or few months after, that being said for the sake of argument because it won’t change anything) then:

1. Muhammad's grandfather and his son, Abduallah, had both sisters on the same day;

2. 'Hamza was born in the same time period of which Muhammad's father's died; 3. 'Hamza is older than Muhammad (Muslim scholars disagree if it isby four years or perhaps seven years);

4. 'Hamza was killed at the battle of 'Ohod at age 59. Muhammad was then 55

years old;

5. Muhammad cannot be the son of that man whom Muslims call Abduallah as we see in Ibn Kathir's book of Al-Bidayah & Al-Nihayiah, Vol. 2, p. 316. At the end, a tribe of Banu Nader came asking for Muhammad, when he was a child, claiming that he was their child. It's so clear that he does not have a father.

To cover this obvious discrepancy, Muhammad told them that a woman can be pregnant for many years. This is how his grandfather was convinced that Muhammad must have been his grandson, even though his mother gave birth to him many years after Abduallah's death.


To conclude this exploration of Muhammad's ancestry, read with me Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 40, Hadith 563. This important hadith shows that Muhammad was no more than a slave to the family he grew up with: As I saw that unpleasant view, I went to the messenger of Allah and told him the story. The prophet came out in the companion of Zaid bin Harith, who was with him afterwards, and I too went in the company of them. The messenger went to

'Hamza (Muhammad's uncle) and spoke roughly to him. 'Hamza looked up at the messenger and said, “Are you not more than the slave of my forefathers?” The messenger withdrew himself and left. This incident occurred before the banning of drinking.

(Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 40, Hadith 563).

(Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 40, Hadith 563).

1. Why would the uncle of Muhammad say such a lie, unless it's true?

2. Also, why did Muhammad withdraw himself right after, without even saying a word?

3. The words of 'Hamza were stating a fact to the point Muhammad could not respond and fight back;

4. Mostly, Muhammad was worried that if he talked more, 'Hamza would say more things that he would not want to hear;

5. It's so clear that Muhammad was not expecting 'Hamza, who is supposed to be his uncle, to say that in the first place;

6. This all leads to one thing: Muhammad is the son of an unknown father; 7. When this family adopted him, they called him Qathem, after one of their sons that had passed away.

Who Told Muhammad That He Was A Prophet?

The first words Muhammad claimed receiving from his god, delivered by the angel Jibreel, are recorded in Qur’an 96:1. Jibreel said to Muhammad, “Read!”

Muhammad replied, “Read what?” Muslims say that he replied “I can't read.”

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 1, Hadith 3, states the following (see also Qur'an 96:1-3):

The angel came to me and said to me, “Iqra'a” (read). I said to him, “I cannot read.” He squeezed me and he said again, “Read.” I said, “I cannot read.” And then he squeezed me again, and he said, “Read.” I said, “I cannot read.” Then he squeezed me for the third time and said, “Read by the name of your lord.”

Now this story does not make sense in any way. Let us think about it together.

The angel said “Read”? Shouldn't I give you a paper or a book to read before I ask you to read something? Muslims, to cover this mistake, claim that it means to recite. However, if it means to recite, why didn't Muhammad say, “I cannot recite!?” Five-year-old children can recite. It must be about reading because the Arabic word clearly means “to read”. This shows a few things proving Islam to be false from the beginning of the story.

1. If Muhammad can't read and he is illiterate, why is the angel using the wrong word: “Read”?

2. If God ordered a man to read, and he is illiterate, wouldn’t he be able to read, as a miracle of God?

In order to explain this furthermore, let’s imagine Jesus saying to the blind man,

“See!” And the blind man would reply, “I can't see”. And then Jesus would say again, “See!” And the blind man would reply once more, “I can't see!” And Jesus would say again for the third time “See!” And at last, the blind man would say again reply, “I cannot see!!!”

This must be a joke! What was the point of him saying it three times if nothing changed? Muhammad was still unable to read!

1. If it's about “recite”, why was the angel using the word “Iqra'a”, which means read? Remember, it's not the angel who chose the word Iqra'a; it’s Allah.

Therefore, Allah chose the wrong word to begin with which caused Muhammad to be confused!

2. What is the secret behind squeezing Muhammad? Did the action of squeezing make Muhammad understand what the angel was trying to say? Not at all!

3. Why three times?! It's about numbers. Islam started from the beginning with a trinity of perfection! One “read” was not enough, but the third one was the consummate one!

4. Every single thing in Islam is based on the number three. For instance, saying the three names of Allah before anything else. The action is based on three for making a perfect cleansing! Blowing their nose three times, wiping their hands three times, and shaking their private parts three times…everything is repeated three times. Why?!

5. I think there is deeper revelation in this made-up story.

The fact is that Muhammad is getting his made-up story from his master, Waraqa Ibn Naofal. In order to understand who is the one who actually created Islam, read with me Isaiah 40:5-6:

5 And the glory of the LORD shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.

6The voice said, Cry. And he said, What shall I cry? All flesh is grass, and all the goodliness thereof is as the flower of the field:

Image 27

Image 28

Image 29

It's very clear that Muhammad is trying to be the prophet Isaiah by changing the story, but thinking that he would come up with a logical story. However, the fact is that, his story proves him false. All this drama is not needed. The story shows that this false god cannot perform miracles, because if Jesus had said to Muhammad “Read!”, I am sure he would have read even if he was illiterate, as Muslims claim.

Why did Allah order Muhammad three times to read but he was still unable to do so in this fabricated story? What is the point of it?


I've given you some useful information about Muhammad's background as a start. Now let's take a look to what Islam is about.

Image 30

start. Now let's take a look to what Islam is about.

What do Muslims say is the most important thing about Islam? They say the following:

The Five Pillars of Islam are the foundation of a Muslim’s life: 1. Faith or belief in the Oneness of God and the finality of the prophet-hood of Muhammad;

2. Establishment of the daily prayers;

3. Paying Zakat (amount of money as charity);

4. Self-purification through fasting;

5. Pilgrimage to Mecca for those who are able.

Rather, the following is what Islam is established upon as part of the total package; not the pillars. This information is absolutely false because Islam is based on six elements, as told by Muhammad himself in the following hadith of Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 1, p. 13:

"I have been ordered by Allah to fight to kill (doing Jihad) all the people until they say that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is his messenger, and that they establish prayer and pay Zakat (money). If they do it, their blood and their property (their Honor) are safe from me."

When we look at this hadith, we learn what Muhammad and Islam want from all mankind. Therefore, this is the...


1. Muhammad has the duty to fight people into forcing them to convert, otherwise he must kill them;

2. Until they convert to Islam;

3. Until they say that there is no god but Allah; 4. And say that Muhammad is his messenger;

5. Then you have to pray to Allah or Muhammad will still kill you (if you do not do the prayer, Muhammad will kill you);

6. And then, and only then, are your money and blood safe from Muhammad and his army. Therefore pillar # 6 is that no one is safe from being killed except the

his army. Therefore pillar # 6 is that no one is safe from being killed except the one converting to Islam.

Let's look at it in other ways. What if you don’t accept Islam?

1. Muslims have to fight you. Muhammad is dead, but they are not, and it's the duty of every Muslim to follow their prophet and do Jihad. Qur'an 9:14 says to,

“Fight them (by the sword), and Allah will penalize them by your hands, cover them with humiliation. Allah will give to you victory over them, heal the chests of worshipers”.

2. Muslims have the right to kill you;

3. They have the right to enslave your women and children, and to rape them (this is the right hand possession of property); 4. They will take your money and your country;

5. They will dominate your land by establishing an Islamic government. Their greatest joy is practicing Islamic Law, beheading, stoning to death, cutting hands and praying for the death of the infidel;

These are the rules in general but there are inside rules Muhammad established in order to generate great income without costing him a penny.

6. Christians and Jews have to pay Jizyah in order to stay alive if they refuse to convert.

As always, Muslims lie to you when saying that, in any country, you have to pay tax. Jizyah, a TAX? This is an absolute falsehood!

How can you take their (Christian) land and then make them pay you money? As an example, if America were an Islamic country, the American soldier would’ve taken Jizyah from all the Iraqis, or else they would have to be killed! The excuse for Jizyah, as Muslims claim, is that you pay money for protection. Protection from who, the Muslims?! It’s as I said, Islam is a gang of thugs (like the mafia).

If you don’t become one of them, you have to pay them, or you are dead. The Qur’an tells us about Jizyah:

1. Chapter 9:29 in the Qur’an says in very clear words that we have to pay it while being disgraced, humiliated and belittled. Do Muslims pay tax in America with disgrace, humiliation and belittlement?

2. The word Jizyah in Arabic means: punishment and penalty. Why doesn't the Muslim’ tax have the same name?! They pay Zakat, not Jizyah. If it’s taxing, then the tax is a tax! Is this a kind of discrimination penalty?! Absolutely, yes.

From Ibn Kathir’s interpretation of Qur’an 9:29, I would like for you to go to and read all of the following link please;

sid=9&tid=20986. You will see how ugly this belief is. It’s based on oppressing other nations and humiliation all those who are not Muslims. I will quote from the Muslims translation:


These are not my words. You will see how Muhammad even ordered Muslims to humiliate any Christian or Jew for no crime, but only for refusing to embrace Islam. He even said (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, interpretation of Sura 9): Do not approach with the greeting of peace (salam) to the Jews and Christians, and if you meet any of them in a road, force them to its narrowest road. (Force them to walk in the sewerage).

In the old days, the sewerage was a narrow channel on the side of the road.

Christians and Muslims could not share the same road at the same time. We hear today Muslims fooling the African-Americans by saying to them, “Look at what the white man has done to you!” When the fact is, the African Americans were sold to the Europeans by the Arab Muslims in North Africa.


Qur’an 8:67: It is not Allah's wish for any prophet to have captives up to the time of he hath caused the massacre in the land. Ye desire the temptation of this world and Allah's plan for the afterlife, and Allah is all powerful and wise.

We do remember the outrage occurred in the prison of Abu Ghraib located in Baghdad and how the world became so angry; but we do not see any anger toward Muslims beheading their captives which included civilians, women, doctors and children, in addition to the soldiers. For that reason, Muhammad made it clear to kill them all, and he manufactured it as always being Allah’s wish, not his, as we see in Qur’an 6:44-45:

44 afterwards, at the same time as they ignored what we reminded them of, We opened unto them the gates of all things (like wealth) until, they delighted in that

which they were given, We seized them suddenly when they are not aware, They were overwhelmed.

45As a consequence of the people who did not accept Islam, they wiped out all, Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Two Worlds! (humans, jinns).

However, Muhammad was terribly weak when it came to money. He preferred to hold live captives. If they were rich, he could ask for a large ransom from any relatives out of his reach, whom he had not yet killed; or if they could teach his army special skills such as reading and writing.

Qur’an 47:3-4: However, afterwards we see Allah changing his mind again. He does not like to have any captives, but wants them to be killed. On top of that, he accuses those who like to have them. They are not obeying Allah’s orders, because their desire is to be wealthy (Allah meant Muhammad). Then why is Qur’an 47:4 telling Muslims to ask for a ransom?

3 This on account of those who decline Allah and follow self-conceits whilst those who believe follow the truthfulness from their Lord: Thus does Allah arrange for men their teachings by parallel.

4Because of that when ye meet the nonMuslims, strike at their necks until you achieve big harm; fasten a chain firmly on them until the war lays down its responsibilities. Moreover, goodness or ransom; therefore, you are ordered, but if Allah wants, He, Allah, could certainly have vanquished them and punish them, except, He causes you to fight in order to make you kill each others.

However, those who are slain for the sake of Allah, He will not let their deeds go lost.

Qur’an 8:67:

It is not Allah's wish for any prophet to have captives up to the time of he hath caused the massacre in the land. Ye desire the temptation of this world and Allah’s plan for the afterlife, and Allah is all powerful and wise.

Note here how Allah is the same as a toy in the hands of Muhammad. If Muhammad needs money, he makes a chapter to accept ransom. When there is no money left in the hands of his enemy, he makes a chapter saying it's a sin to seek a ransom!

Definitely, he needed to be sure that no one in the future would say that he was a false prophet ever again. Having taken all their money, they had no money or

false prophet ever again. Having taken all their money, they had no money or family to pay off the ransom! Why would he keep them alive?

During the time we read about Islam, we have to always keep in mind that Islam is a government and a political party; not only a religion based on racism and hatred against everyone unwilling to participate as a Muslim, a slave, or as someone who is obedient to the system, but who is not part of it (Islam). Such a person cannot receive any protection, or any political right, or social benefit beyond that if he chooses not to be Muslim. For that reason being, he is considered to be a criminal, a filthy person in the eyes of Muslims, Allah and Islam.


How will Muslims treat you, is based on who you are.

1. If you are an Atheist, a Hindu, a Buddhist or any other religion other than the Christian or the Jewish faith, all the men will be killed. If a Muslim chooses not to enslave your women and children as sex toys, then they will also be killed.

2. Christians have to pay Jizyah. Added to that, they have to obey the following orders, which are called the Pact of 'Umar.


From the Book of Jalal Al-Deen Al-Suyuti, Hadith 30999, Book of Ahkam Ahel Al Zimmad (dimma), Vol. 2, p. 661, The Book of Al-Sunan Al-Kubra, Hadith 19186, Book of Al Jawab Ak Al-Sahih Liman Badal Deen Al-Maseeh.

Image 31

When Muslims attacked Syria (at that time, Israel, Jordan, and some of present day Iraq), they started forcing their conditions on the unwealthy Christians. The Pact of 'Umar represents, as Muslims claim, the most remarkable justice system you can imagine. They all agree that, what 'Umar had put in place, was an amazing justice. They even called 'Umar the Khalifa, the Just.

This is the pact which Christians agreed to (with no choice) in order to stay alive.

'Abd Al-Rahman Ibn Ghanam, I wrote this letter to the Khalifa 'Umar Ibn Al-Khattab, to the Christians of Ash-Sham (Syria). In the name of God, the most Merciful and most Graceful. This is a letter to the servant of God, 'Umar, the Khalifa of the believers, from the Nassarah (Christians) of Ash-Sham (Syrian cities). You came against us and we asked for our safety and security for our people and property, and we undertook the following obligations toward you: We agree not to build, in our cities or around them, any new Christian

We agree not to build, in our cities or around them, any new Christian monasteries, nor churches, nor Christian buildings, nor monks' houses, nor shall we fix or repair, by daytime or by night time, if any of these buildings fall in ruins or are situated in the land now owned by Muslims (Muslims now own all the country so, you are in their land).

We agree to give shelter to any Muslim who chooses to be in our houses, and we shall give free food and shelter for any Muslim who stops by for three days.

We agree not to allow any spy to have shelter in our churches or in our houses or to hide him from Muslims.

We agree not to teach the Qur'an to our children. We agree not to manifest our religion publicly or try to convert anyone to it.

We will not prevent any of our people from converting to Islam if they wish it.

We agree to pay and show respect toward the Muslims, and we shall rise and stand from our seats when they wish to sit (if a Muslim enters a place you should stand up and give him your chair, or you will die).

We agree not to try to resemble or to look like Muslims by dressing in their clothes, the turban, footwear, or the parting of the hair. We shall not speak as they do, nor shall we adopt their first or last names.

We shall not mount on saddles, nor shall we carry a sword, nor own or bear any kind of arms, nor carry weapons with us.

We agree not to engrave Arabic symbols on our seals. We agree not to sell wine.

We agree to shave the front hair of our heads.

We agree to always dress in the same kind of clothes, all of us, and we shall bind the shame belt around our waists.

We agree not to display nor expose our crosses or our books. We agree not to let our buyers or sellers on the roads or markets in the presence of Muslims.

We agree to use only church bells in our churches very softly. We will not raise our voices when in funerals or in the presence of Muslims.

We agree not to show any fire on any of the roads (for lighting) of the Muslims or in their markets.

We shall not bury dead Christians near the grave of a Muslim. We agree not to take slaves of which whom Muslims have chosen by or allotted to Muslims.

take slaves of which whom Muslims have chosen by or allotted to Muslims.

We agree not to build high houses exposing the houses of the Muslims.

And when I brought this letter to 'Umar, he added to it: We shall not strike a Muslim.

We accept these conditions for ourselves and for the people, and if we disobey any of these conditions, we will pay the outcome of disobeying as people of the rebel.

The end of the Pact of 'Umar.

When Muslims read these lines, they feel the rejoicement of the old days when Muslims had conquered most of Africa, most of Asia and some parts of Europe.

The dream of every Muslim is to one day institute every band of the Pact of

'Umar on you, your family and your country. The day Muslims will have power, they will not hesitate for a second to implement it, because it's Allah's order and it's the easiest path for wealth. Muslims in that era, even the homeless ones, lived like kings. They got free money, housing, women, sex, and even your wife!

What can you do about it? Nothing! You have to take it or die.

Even if you are a prince and a Muslim of no social status enters your house, you have to stand up and give him your chair, your bed, your food and women for three days and nights. Before the end of the three nights, a new Muslim could come! Your house will be a free pimp hotel for every Muslim.

A Muslim can beat you, but you cannot hit back. Be careful or you are breaking the treaty! You have to shave the front part of your head, as an insult, to make you look like a fool.

If a Muslim makes fun of your Bible, you have no right to answer back, or you will be accused of trying to convert a Muslim. The punishment is death.



This is something you always hear in western countries. Most of those who say it are just trying to prove me wrong!

First of all, I am talking about Islam, not Muslims. The word “Muslim”, means nothing if the person doesn't practice Islam. Maybe he isn't playing the deception game as those who committed the atrocities of the September 11thevent, as they

went to strip clubs and drank! Why? To deceive the FBI in case they were being watched.

You should know that the Qur’an says that Muslims are not allowed to take us as friends or protectors, as Qur’an 5:51 says:

Take not Christians and Jews as friends and protectors, they are friends to each other, and if any of you take them as friends, he is one of them an unjust to himself (which means he is out of Islam, and he will be punished by death).

See the Yusuf Ali’s translation of Qur’an 5:51:

O ye who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors. They are but friends and protectors to each other, and he among you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily, Allah guides not the unjust people.

By the way, a Muslim may say to you that this is about not taking a friend from those who are at war with them! If you both were at war, why would that person take you as a friend anyway?

The fact is, yes, “do not take anyone we are in war with” includes all Christians and Jews, for Islam divides the entire earth into two parts; Land of Peace and Land of War. There are even those who try to fool the West about the so-called peaceful Islam, like Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi. He said in Al-Sharq Al-Awsat newspaper in London on July 19, 2003, “It has been determined by Islamic law that the blood and property of the people of Dar Al-Harb (house of war—any land that is not submitting to Allah), where Muslims are in war and battle, is not protected.”

Now this is a man who works hard trying to give a better appearance of Islam in the West, but he did agree that all of those who are not in a sublimation stage to Islam have to be killed. He is basing this on his prophet's words (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 8, Hadith 387):

"I have been commanded to fight (fight to kill) all the people up to the time that they say: 'None should be worshiped but Allah.' And if they say so, and pray like we pray, face our Qibla (direction of the Kaaba) and butcher the same as we slaughter, then and only after that their blood and property will be protected from me...”

Image 32

Image 33

I think these are very clear words from Muhammad: convert or die. This will take us to the word “Islam” which Muslims claim means “peace”.


It upsets me when some ignorant person goes on TV and gives us his rubbish saying, “Islam is peace and peaceful” or even, “Islam means peace!”

I do not need to remind you about those who lie, like President Obama and other western leaders, saying that Islam is peace. Either they are unbelievably ignorant about Islam, or they are simply liars.

First of all, Islam does not mean peace. Peace in Arabic is Salam. Does Islam look the same to you?

ﺲ مand


Islam is

totally the opposite of the word peace.

I'm not sure how good your memory is, but do you remember this hadith from Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. I, p. 13 or Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 8, Hadith 387.

“I have been ordered by Allah to fight to kill (do Jihad) all the people until they say that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is his messenger, and that they establish prayer and pay Zakat (money). If they do it, their blood and their property (their Honor) are safe from me.”

The same story can be found in Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Numbers 29, 30 and 32.

Excerpt from Qur'an 49:14 (Mohsin Khan translation):

…say, “We have surrendered (in Islam), for faith has not yet entered your hearts…”

In the coming chapter, we will see how Muhammad proves that the new Muslims did not accept Islam by faith, but by the sword. He's telling them in clear words, “You cannot fool me by claiming that you converted, because you only did after you surrendered yourself to my sword.” This is what Islam means exactly.

Qur'an 49: 14 (Mohsin Khan translation):

The Bedouins say: "We believe." Say: "You believe not but you only say, 'We have surrendered (in Islam),' for Faith has not yet entered your hearts. But if you obey Allah and His Messenger (SAW), He will not decrease anything in reward for your deeds. Verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."

If Islam is peace, why was Muhammad ordered to fight until we convert? If we convert and become slaves of Muhammad, because he is the real god of Islam, not Allah, then and only then will our blood not be shed and our women will not be enslaved, raped and killed.

If a Muslim kills you, he will not be punished for it, for your blood is free.

Notice, if you kill a cow in Islam, you have to pay the owner for it, but if you kill a Christian or a Jew, your blood is free for Muslims, as we see in this following hadith.


Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 3, Hadith 111, Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 52, Hadith 283

and Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 83, Hadith 50:

“The prophet said that no Muslim should be killed as punishment for the killing of a disbeliever.”

What justice had Muhammad delivered by discriminating in the case of murder as a punishment? Therefore, if you are a Muslim and kill a nonMuslim, you’re a good individual. But if a Christian were to murder a Muslim, he’d have to be killed and this is supposed to be perfect justice. Imagine if we had a law saying that if you kill a Muslim, you are not to be punished!

President Obama quoted in his speech, on his trip to Egypt, a portion of the verse from the Qur’an 5:32. He said:

“The Holy Koran teaches that whoever kills an innocent, it is as if he has killed all mankind; and whoever saves a person, it is as if he has saved all mankind. The enduring faith of over a billion people is so much bigger than the narrow hatred of a few. Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism - it is an important part of promoting peace.”

The fact is, Muhammad took this verse from the Jewish Mishnah, Sanhedrin 4:5

and it is also recorded in the Bible, Genesis 9:6 (New King James version): 6 Whoever sheds man’s blood, By man his blood shall be shed; For in the image of God

He made man.

Note here the real justice. If you are Jewish and you kill anyone, not necessarily a Jew, you will be killed.

Later we will see that if a Muslim kills a nonMuslim, he will not be killed!

But President Obama didn't quote the first part of Qur'an 5:32, which clearly states that this verse was given as a direction to the Children of Israel. This referenced portion of the verse is only incumbent on the people of Israel. What that verse actually means is that killing is fine for those who do mischief on earth, from the Muslim perspective. Who are the ones that can be killed for doing mischief on the earth? 1. The Christians

2. The Jews

3. The Hindus

4. The Buddhists

5. The Atheists



Muhammad was ordered to kill us all; either we convert, or we pay Jizyah.

Note: The option of Jizyah is only applied for the Christians and Jews. Death is a must for all others as stated in Qur’an 9:29:

Combat those who disbelieve in Allah nor the Judgment Day, nor forbid what Allah and His Messenger command to be forbidden, nor embrace the religion of

Image 34

Allah and His Messenger command to be forbidden, nor embrace the religion of truthfulness (Islam) from the People of the Book (Christian & Jewish), until they pay the Jizyah with force and surrender and feel themselves humiliated and conquered.

In Arabic,

we do not say “Qatel” for someone fighting with another by hitting each other.

“Qatel” means “Fight to kill”.

To prove that the mischief with words in this verse is about us, we can read again Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 8, Hadith 387; Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 52, Hadith 196; Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 84, Hadith 59; Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 92, Hadith 388:

“I have been ordered by Allah to fight to kill (do Jihad) all the people until they say that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is his messenger, and that they establish prayer and pay Zakat (money). If they do it, their blood and their property (their honor) are safe from me.”

The same story can be found in Sahih Muslim, Book 001, Numbers 0029 and 0030.

You can read many verses in the Qur’an like Qur’an 9:29. But to prove that this verse refers only to the killing of a Muslim when it says (Qur’an 5:32), “The one who killed one man is as if he killed all mankind” and has to be punished, we simply turn to the hadiths of Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 3, Hadith 111; Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 52, Hadith 283; and Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 83, Hadith 50: The prophet said that no Muslim should be killed as punishment for the killing of a disbeliever.

Why won't a Muslim be punished if he kills a Christian? The answer is simple.

You (the Christian) are doing mischief by rejecting Islam according to Muhammad, and that makes you and your blood free. This is how Muhammad

Muhammad, and that makes you and your blood free. This is how Muhammad had spread Islam, as shown in the hadith of Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 1, p. 1.

The coming verse in the Qur’an will tell us who is the one doing mischief on earth.

From Ibn Kathir, we find the following tafsir. Read his translations for yourself on this link:

Now, read my translation: What Muslims translate as, “ would be, as if he killed all mankind” should be translated to, “Whoever kills a single soul that Allah has given protection from killing, is the same as he who kills all mankind.”Book of Tafsir Al-Qur'an, Ibn Kathir, print. 2, 1999, Vol. 3, p. 93: Similarly reported from Sa’eed Bin Jubaer, he revealed, “He who authorizes himself to spill the blood of a Muslim, is same as he who allows shedding the blood of all mankind. He who prohibits shedding the blood of single Muslim is the like of he who forbids shedding the blood of all mankind.”

It's about shedding blood, which Allah forbids the blood shed of Mulsims only.

This is why Muhammad said in Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 3, Hadith 111; Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 52, Hadith 283; and Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 83, Hadith 50:

“...The prophet said that no Muslim should be killed as punishment for the killing of a disbeliever....”

If killing a single soul was not meant to refer only to the Muslims, then the punishment should be death. The verse says in clear words, death is the punishment for he who kills. However, Muhammad made it clear that this is about someone killing a Muslim. The fact is, you do not need to kill a Muslim to be killed. As I previously stated, you are an enemy of Allah if you aren't a Muslim. It's the duty of each Muslim to shed your blood, unless you convert to Islam. As we discover in the hadith of Al-Muwatta'Imam Malik Ibn Anas, Book 43, Hadith 15:8, “Jew or Christian, his blood-money ransom is half the blood-money of a free Muslim:”

Yahya notified me from Malik, whom he heard that 'Umar Ibn 'Abed Al-'Aziz (Muslim Khalifa) granted a judgment that when a Jew or Christian was killed, his blood-money ransom is half the blood-money of a free Muslim.

Malik said, “What is accomplished in our community is that a Muslim shall not

Image 35

Malik said, “What is accomplished in our community is that a Muslim shall not be killed in retaliation for the death of Christian or a Jew, unless the Muslim killed him doing treason. In such a matter, he is killed for it.”

In the Book of Al-'Ebar Fe Kheir Man Gaber by Al-Zahabi Vol. 1, p. 175, Ibn Kathir, Book of Al-Bedaiah Wal Elnihayah Vol. 3, p. 318, and Vol. 11, The Great Year of 398:

“The destroying of the garbage (name given to The Church of the Holy Sepulcher by Muslims) in the year 398. In that year, the Muslim ruler (Khalifa) ordered the destruction of the church of garbage (The Church of the Holy Sepulcher), and it's the church of the Christian, and allowed all the Muslims to steal from it, all the furniture and whatever was in it. The reason for that was their (Christians) claim of the Holy Fire that comes from the sky from the empty grave of Jesus on the Easter day is false, and they are trying to make the naive Christian believe it, when it's made from the paint of Al-Balsan!” During that same time, they ordered the destruction of many Christian churches in Egypt, and they started calling for the Christians to leave the land of Islam, if they didn't want to accept Islam and accept the Islamic conditions imposed on them. The Khalifa also added more to the Pact of 'Umar.

1. Every Christian has to wear a four-pound cross made of wood on his neck; 2. Every Jew has to carry on his head a bull (bovine) made of wood weighing six pounds;

3. When they go to the public bathroom they have to hang on their necks a six-pound water container and attach bells to this container; 4. And they are forbidden from using horses.

Image 36

Image 37

An unfortunate black slave woman was slaughtered, with no mercy, for one crime. She insulted Muhammad. Muhammad gave his blessing to the killer, as we see in this following hadith. Book of Ibn Dawood, 'Hodood (punishment) of those who insult the prophet (Sunan Ibn Dawood 'Hodood, p. 129, Hadith 4361, Arabic; Book 38, Hadith 4348, English):

The Book of Ibn Dawood, 'Hodood (punishment) of those who insult the prophet (Sunan Ibn Dawood 'Hodood, p. 129, Hadith 4361, Arabic; Book 38, Hadith 4348, English):

4348, English):

Reported Abdallah Ibn 'Abbas: “That a blind man had a slave-mother of one of his offspring, which used foul language at the Prophet of Allah and disrespected Him, and her owner commanded her not to do that, but she did not stop insulting the Prophet. One night she began making fun of the Prophet so, he took a stiletto, pierced her belly with it, and he put his weight on it and went through her belly, and killed her. Her child who stood between her legs, and he was wrapped with her blood. When the morning came, the Prophet was told about the incident. He gathered the people and said: ‘I seek by Allah the man who has done what he has done (killing the slave), and I ask him by my right on him that he should stand up.’ The blind man stood up trembling to the Prophet. He sat in front of the Prophet, and said: ‘Oh Apostle of Allah! I am her master; she used to insult you and say bad things about you. I forbade her, but she did not stop, and I rebuked her, but she did not abandon her habit. I have two sons like pearls from her, and she was my companion. Last night she began to abuse and disparage you. So I took a stiletto, put it on her belly, and I put my weight on it until it went through her until I killed her.’ Thereupon the Prophet said: ‘Oh the people be witnesses, no punishment for killing her and her blood for free.’”

This is why Muslims in London had big signs saying, “Behead those who insult the Prophet,” and “I think Islam is just about peace and justice!” Did you notice that Muhammad did not even investigate if the man was telling the truth or not?

This means if you live in an Islamic land and you kill your slave, or even your wife, all you need to do to be free from any punishment is to claim that she insulted the Prophet and then you are a hero!

Below, read this Fatwa of a Muslim sheikh replying to Muslims asking if this story is true:


Answer to Question 6491 from United Kingdom:

We confirm the authenticity of this narration.

The reason for which no punishment was imposed on the man who murdered the women is that she had explicitly sworn Rasulullah (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam). Such a person is termed as 'Mubaah-ud-dam', i.e. if killed, there can be no claim of retaliation. (See Badhlul Majhood, Vol. 6, p. 125). There is Ijmaa (consensus) on this ruling. And Allah Ta'ala Knows Best Moulana Muhammad Ibn Moulana Haroon


CHECKED AND APPROVED: Mufti Ebrahim Desai.

This also shows that Muhammad is more important than Allah. In Islam, if you insult Allah, you are given three days to repent or you must die, but if you insult Muhammad, you are killed even if you repent.

When they quote Qur'an 5:32 to show you that Islam IS PEACE, it's a big


Whoever says Islam means peace, demonstrates his ignorance. What is known today as political correctness is based on “let’s pretend that we do not know that Islam is evil, and if someone says the truth, he must be Islamophobic!”

As long as we are talking about justice, let's see how Muhammad was unfair in his fairness, not only among Muslims and nonMuslims, but also among Muslims themselves, when it came to males and females.


Muhammad named himself God. In case you might wonder what I’m talking about, did he not repeatedly say that he was the slave of God?

We need to know that Muhammad made a jump, from someone who did not have faith and did not know the scriptures, to someone who became a prophet of God overnight, as shown in the following verse of Qur'an 42:52, Muhammad Pickthall translation:

And thus have We inspired in thee (Muhammad) a spirit of Our command. Thou knowest not what the scripture was, nor what the faith. But We have made it a light whereby We guide whom We will of Our bondmen. And lo! Thou verily dost guide unto a right path.

How can Muslims claim that Muhammad was a follower of Abraham when he did not know “what the Scriptures were, nor what the faith” is? This shows us that Muhammad himself was a kafir (infidel). How can an infidel who did not know what faith meant and had never heard of the Scriptures, as revealed to us in the verse, suddenly chooses to be a prophet and place himself as God?

Well, Muhammad used the name of God to make himself God. I will prove to you that Muhammad’s real name is Qathem (

ﻖ ). Muhammad changed his

Image 38

Image 39

name when he was 30 years old, and he did so at the instigation of his wife, Khadija, and her cousin. At that time, Khadija and her cousin worked out a plan to make Muhammad the ruler of all tribes in Arabia. They knew that it was easy for Muhammad to control and dictate authority over the people, if he claimed that his authority came from God—so they proclaimed to him, “By the name of God, you are God!”

Muhammad takes the place of God (Sunan Ibn Majah, Book of Jihad, Hadith 2859):

The Prophet said whoever obeys me, obeys Allah, and whomever disobeys me, disobeys Allah, and whomever obeys the Imam, obeys me and whomever disobeys the Imam, disobeys me.

Qur’an 4:80:

He who abides by the Apostle, he indeed obeys God. However, [those] whom obey him not, Allah is watching him (as a threat), We have not sent [one] to watch over them.

As we see in the above verse, there is a written approval in the Qur’an for Muhammad to take the place of God. This then means that the laws of Islam have two sources: Muhammad and the Qur’an (which comes from Muhammad anyway!).

The fact is that the main sources of the Islamic law are solely from the actions

Image 40

The fact is that the main sources of the Islamic law are solely from the actions and speeches of Muhammad.

1. Muhammad’s recitations (Qur’an);

2. Muhammad’s speeches and orders (Sunnah);

3. Muhammad’s actions (even the simplest or silly ones, like how to pee) (Sunnah).

Clearly, Muhammad and God became one. The word of Muhammad is the word of God, and the order of Muhammad is the order of God.

Muhammad takes precedence over God (Qur’an 4:80): Whoever obeys the Prophet, he indeed obeyed Allah; and whoever did not obey, we send not a protector over them.

It is more important to obey Muhammad than to obey God. This is why we notice that there is a huge interest on the part of God to satisfy the sexual desires of Muhammad, and whatever Muhammad wished became law.


All of this was not enough for Muhammad. Something was missing and that was the title. I do not mean the title of “Prophet”—he got that already by his sword.

When he was born, he was given the name Qathem, not Muhammad. Why change his name to Muhammad and what is that name all about?

Let’s look at the following biblical figures and their titles: 1. Abraham - Father of Prophet-hood;

2. Moses - One who spoke to God (Kalem Allah ﻣ


3. Jesus - The Messiah.

So, the new man in the theater, Qathem (Muhammad), needed a new name.

The following verse explains why Muhammad chose his many names and titles (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 56, Hadith 732):

Allah's messenger said, “I have five names: I am Muhammad and Ahmad; I am the Eraser (Al-Mahi), one through whom Allah will erase Infidels (Christianity),

Image 41

the Eraser (Al-Mahi), one through whom Allah will erase Infidels (Christianity), I am the Collector (Al-Hashir, means mankind will be gathered in front of him), the first to be resurrected, no one ahead of me; and I am The Last (Al-Aqib), no one comes after me.”

Let us take a closer look at these names:

I’m not sure how you feel or think about these names, but I feel Satan’s words are in them. Notice that Muhammad chose “The Praised One,” which, not surprisingly, is one of the 99 names of Allah. He declared himself as God, so that Muslims would follow him without question. They approve what he approved, and forbid what he forbade, even if what he said contradicts the orders of Allah in the Qur’an. The Muslims continue to follow Muhammad over Allah. MUHAMMAD (THE ALL PRAISEWORTHY) AND


To verify the meaning of any verse quoted, go to:

Qur’an 61:6, Muhammad Pickthall translation:

And when Jesus son of Mary said, O Children of Israel! Lo! I am the messenger of Allah unto you, confirming that which was (revealed) before me in the Torah,

Image 42

of Allah unto you, confirming that which was (revealed) before me in the Torah, and bringing good tidings of a messenger who cometh after me, whose name is the Praised One. Yet when he hath come unto them with clear proofs, they say: This is mere magic.

Throughout the Qur’an, “The Praised One” is used for Allah, except in Chapter 61:6, where Muhammad is given the privilege to share Allah’s name.

Muhammad is also The Praised One.

The root word is “Ham’d”. The following words all come from the root word

Ham’d”, and all of them mean the same, “The Praised One”.

If Muhammad was a slave of God, why then did he hijack God’s name? The answer is easy. Muhammad knew that he was a false prophet, and knew exactly what he could achieve by proclaiming himself “The Praised One.” He wanted absolute obedience, absolute control, and absolute deception. By proclaiming himself as “The Praised One,” he made sure that no one would dare to question him.

The hadiths point to one conclusion; Muhammad is God (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book of Ablution, Hadith 186):

Image 43

The prophet did his ablution so the people were taking the remaining of his water and spread it all over their faces...even to the point some of the prophet's companions were fighting over his leftover water.

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 8, Hadith 373: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 72, Hadith 750; I witnessed Bilal picking the leftover water that the prophet had used for his ablution, and lots of the Muslims were seizing of that water and applying it on their faces. Whoever could not get anything of it, would apply the moisture from the hand of his companion to spread it all over on his face.

Now think about it, ablution water is the wash water, and in case you don’t know, this is the water Muhammad used to wash such parts as his penis and testicles. So how and why did these Muslims think that the water Muhammad used to wash his private parts was holy water for blessing?

References of how Muslims used to be blessed by Muhammad:

Image 44

Image 45

Book of Al-Libas (Dress and Adornment), Part 3, p. 165. “This is the dress of the prophet he used to dress in, and we hid it for the sick ones, so they can recover by it.”




Book of Sahih Muslim, Book of Clothes, p. 1641, Hadith 2069:

'Aisha came back to Asma' ('Aisha's sister) and she told her this is the under clothes of the prophet ...we wash it so the sick ones can be recovered by it.


Pay for a place in Heaven with a farmland:

Image 46

Image 47

Qur'an 64:17,

Muhammad Pickthall translation:

If ye lend unto Allah a goodly loan, He will double it for you and will forgive you, for Allah is Responsive, Clement.

TheBook of Al-Qur’tubi interprets Qur’an 64:17as follows: Abu Al-Da'hda'h said “’O messenger of Allah you're saying that Allah wants us to give him a loan?’ He said (Muhammad) ‘Yes Abu Al-Da'hda'h.’ Therefore, Abu Al-Da'hda'h said ‘Give me your hand I am giving Allah a loan, a farm has 600 palm trees’ and he went to his wife in the farm so he called her ‘O mother of Al-Da'hda'h’, she said ‘I'm here for you’, he said ‘Come out I lent my God Allah the Almighty the farm which has 600 palm trees’, and it is narrated by Zaed Ibn

'Aslam he said ‘When the verse was revealed "who lent Allah a loan?", Abu Al-Da'hda'h said "I scarifice my father and mother for your sake O messenger of Allah, but does Allah need a loan as he is rich?" The messenger replied ‘Yes by that loan He (Allah) wanted to make you enter heaven’, Abu Al-Da'hda'h replied

‘So if I lend Allah a loan, am I granted by it my part of heaven, me and my children's in Paradise?’, The messenger replied ‘Yes’”

Muhammad sold a land in Allah’s heaven to a man named Abu Al-Da’hda’h for a 600-palm-tree farm. Muhammad told Abu Al-Da’hda’h that the farm was a loan to Allah, and then he granted Abu Al-Da’hda’h a place in heaven.

The same story can be found in:

We always hear Muslims criticizing the Catholic Pope for having sold to people promises of a place in heaven. Whether this is true or not, Christians know that this is a crime of deception and theft. It is against the teachings of Jesus Christ.

this is a crime of deception and theft. It is against the teachings of Jesus Christ.

On the other hand, Muhammad took it upon himself to exchange lands for a man to earn a place in heaven. What about the poor people who cannot afford to exchange lands or money for a place in heaven?

Note that Muhammad was taking the land as his own. He did not make the exchange to donate to the poor.


Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 46, Hadith 771:

Reported by Jaber Ibn Abdullah: “There was a man who promised his slave that the slave will be freed after his (the master’s) death. After the slave’s master died, the Prophet called the slave and sold him. The slave died in the same year he was sold.”

Look at how evil this act is. God knew that this slave received a promise of freedom upon his master’s death. However, Muhammad had other intentions. He sent his men to take the slave, and then he sold him to a new master. Muhammad stole the slave’s freedom in order to make money. It’s so clear that Muhammad had no moral values to stop his greed. He was supposed to be this ideal man that everybody should follow as a perfect example of morality and compassion.



Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book of Al-Futo'h, Hadith 4599: Reported by Anas Ibn Malik: “There was among us a humble young man with great act of worship and faith, who did good faithful work. So we mentioned his name to the Prophet, but he did not recognize him. Then we described him to the Prophet, but he still did not recognize him. Then we said to the Prophet, ‘Oh, here he is!’ The the Prophet said, ‘His face has the look of Satan.’”

So the man came and said, ‘Peace to you all.’ The Prophet said to him, ‘Do you think of yourself as the best man in here?’ He (the young man) said, ‘By Allah, yes, I am.’ Then he left and went inside the mosque. The Prophet said, ‘Who would kill this man (for me)?’ Abu Bakr said, ‘I will.’ So Abu Bakr went after the young man inside the mosque and found him standing in prayer. Abu Bakr thought to himself, ‘The Prophet forbids us from killing a Muslim while he is praying!’

Then the Prophet said again, ‘Who would kill the man?’ 'Umar said, ‘I will do it,

Then the Prophet said again, ‘Who would kill the man?’ 'Umar said, ‘I will do it, Prophet.’ So 'Umar entered the mosque and found the man bowing down on his face in prayer. So ‘Umar said, ‘The Prophet forbids us from killing a Muslim while he is praying. I will come back (to kill him after he is finished with his prayers).’ Then the Prophet said, ‘Who will kill the man?’ Then Ali said, ‘I will kill him, Prophet’. So Ali entered the mosque and found the young man had gone! Then Muhammad said, ‘If that man was killed, not two of my nation would disagree with each other!’”

This story can also be found in Book of Jwawame’ El Fawa’ed, Vol. 6, Hadith 10401:

Let us study this story. The young man Muhammad wanted to be killed had not committed any crime. All Muslims, even the leaders, agreed that this man is a great Muslim. He is a devout believer, humble, faithful, and diligent with his prayers. He accepted Muhammad as Allah’s prophet. He was such a good Muslim that other Muslims around Muhammad thought that his goodness deserved to be recognized by mentioning his name to Muhammad. When he was called to meet with the prophet, the man greeted him with peace. After the meeting, he left Muhammad with the greeting of peace for a second time and went straight to the mosque to pray.

We would think that Muhammad would praise this man as a good example for all Muslims, but according to the story, Muhammad wanted him killed instead.

Why? The answer is, he posed a threat to Muhammad’s position as the ideal Muslim. In a very short time, Muslims around Muhammad noticed and praised the man's piety. They clearly held him with much respect, but Muhammad reacted differently. During the man's short meeting with the prophet, he was asked if he thought he was the best of men. The man confidently answered, “By Allah, yes, I am.” Muhammad's insecurity couldn't take it. He did not want to be compared to the piety of this man, so he ordered him to be killed.

Muhammad’s treatment of this pious man shows his ugly side. He is supposed to be a prophet but he is more satanic than holy. If he was holy, why would he order the death of a good Muslim believer who obeyed Allah and accepted Muhammad as a prophet? Not only that, although he knew that the young man was in the mosque praying, Muhammad kept sending his men to kill the young believer. After many unsuccessful attempts, the man finally ran for his life.


Muslims make fun of Christianity on the subject of the “original sin” as they criticize it when as a fact, in Islam, they believe in it even more than in Christianity.

We are told many times that Islam does not accept the Christian concept of the original sin. If that is the case, how do Muslims explain the following hadith of Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 77, Hadith 611?

Reported Abu Huraira: “Allah's Messenger said: ‘Adam and Moses debated with each other’. Moses said to Adam, ‘To You Adam! You are our ancestor who displeased us and fired us out of heaven’”.

“Moses said to Adam, “To You Adam! You are our ancestor who displeased us and fired us out of heaven.” (NOTE: Muhammad apparently confused the Garden of Eden with Heaven as he thought that Adam and Eve lived in Heaven up in the skies, before sinning and therefore being cast out); Is this not exactly what the original sin is about? Muslims are out of heaven (Paradise) due to Adam’s sin not Muslims’ sin (Sahih Muslim, Book 016, Hadith 4156):

Allah's Messenger said, “No man who is murdered unjustly, but the share of this transgression of his also descends from the first son of Adam for he was the first to establish killing.”

Now you might say this has nothing to do with the original sin. As a matter of fact, it does. When Cain, the first son of Adam, killed his brother, it was his choice. If I kill today, I do it by my own choice also. In other words, I did not kill because Cain killed, but I sinned (by killing), because sin started with Cain.

Cain's capacity for sin became our inheritance, or as Muhammad puts it, we

share the sin of Cain.

Other hadiths even show a stronger connection: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 55, Hadith 547:

Abu Huraira Reported: “The Messenger said, ‘If there were no Jewish existence, meat would never spoil and if Eve did not exist, wives would never cheat on their spouses.’”

This is proof that Muhammad thought there is an endless connection between the

Image 48

This is proof that Muhammad thought there is an endless connection between the sin of Eve and the sin of every woman. Otherwise, how can we explain the connection between what Eve did and what women do today?

1. Eve's sin is the reason for the sins of all women, according to Muhammad; 2. It looks like the words of Muhammad are trying to make us accept that sin is the same as an inherited disease.

It is explained in Qur’an 2:35-38 that Adam was given the gift of heaven; then he sinned, which caused him to be expelled from heaven. Since Adam is the one who sinned, why are the rest of us not in heaven? If there is no connection between his sin and ours we should be in heaven now.

Is it the fault of Adam or is it ours? Are we out of heaven due to the sin of Adam or due to our sins? Remember that a newborn baby has not yet sinned to deserve not to be born inheaven. If given the same chance as was given to Adam and Eve, the newborn would’ve been cast out of heavenif he had done wrong.

Therefore, it obviously makes sense that we are out ofheavenas a result of Adam’s disobedience to God.

We also see Muhammad showing his hypocrisy by blaming women, to this day, for Eve’s sin as if it were her’s alone. It is important to remember that even in the teachings of Islam, the first sin or original sin--that is, sin committed by Adam and Eve together--is connected to our life today.


By reciting this verse and making it into a permanent law, Muhammad successfully subjugated the minds of his followers. To question Muhammad is to be against Allah (Qur’an 5:101):

“O you believers, ask not questions about things that look ugly for you in the Qur’an.” (Qur’an 5:101):

Muhammad made this threat clear with a follow-up verse that condemns anyone who asks questions to be a traitor, an apostate (Qur’an 5:102): The people before you asked the very same questions and they became infidels.

You cannot question Muhammad and the Qur’an. If you do, you will be accused of:

1. Being an apostate (out of Islam);

2. Trying to convert others out of Islam;

3. Insulting the prophet.

Questioning Muhammad and/or the Qur’an is frowned upon. To question them is the same as saying that Muhammad is a liar.

Anyone who is found guilty of any of the accusations I mentioned above can be punished with a death sentence.

When you find yourself asking what Muhammad fears from questions, you find your answer in Qur’an 5:102. It clearly tells you that you will leave Islam when you ask questions. Why? Because:

a) Muhammad has no convincing answers

b) the Qur’an is not convincing, and

c) the Qur’an is not clear and will never be clear.


The Qur’an itself confirms that no one knows what a huge portion of it means, except Allah. Only Allah knows (Qur’an 3:7, Usama Dakdok translation): He is who has sent down on you the book (Qur'an); some of its verses are decisive. Those are the mother of the book and the others are ambiguous. So those whose hearts deviate, so they will follow what is ambiguous of it, desiring the sedition and desiring its interpretation, and no one knows its interpretation except Allah. And those deeply rooted in knowledge say, “We believe in it, all of it from our lord.”...

What we get from this verse completes what we earlier mentioned in Qur’an 5:101 that no one is to ask questions. Qur’an 3:7 clearly tells us that Muhammad himself has no answers.


Muhammad shot himself in the foot when he invented Qur’an 3:7. By saying that no one—NO ONE except Allah —knows the meaning of the majority of verses in the Qur’an, it means Muhammad himself has no right to interpret them.

verses in the Qur’an, it means Muhammad himself has no right to interpret them.

This leaves his followers with no one to turn to for real explanations.

1. Since no one understands a huge portion of the Qur’an except Allah, then all interpretations of all the verses in that ambiguous portion are wrong; 2. Since all interpretations are wrong, then all of Muhammad’s and everyone else’s interpretations are also wrong;

3. Since all of Muhammad’s and everyone else's interpretations are wrong, then what’s the use of revealing all those ambiguous verses?

The only answer Allah gives us is that they can be used by “those whose hearts deviate, so they will follow what is ambiguous of it, desiring the sedition and desiring its interpretation.” So, did Allah reveal those verses only to give malicious people something to use to confuse and deceive other people? Allah, in this verse, admits that his book is full of confusion, and that he is the author of confusion.

People will naturally want and try to interpret Allah’s words to understand what he wants from his people, but they will fail. Allah never offered to guide anyone who wants to know and understand his words. He discourages questions. He only wants people to understand that he knows what he means, and all they need to do is believe that he spoke to them through Muhammad.

We can safely say then, that in order for you to be considered knowledgeable, all you need to do is believe blindly. Earn your knowledge by rote memorization, not by asking questions. This is how Muhammad indoctrinated Muslims into simply memorizing the Qur’an instead of studying it. He also kept them away from asking questions and reflecting on the meaning of the verses by keeping them busy with praying five times a day and constantly fighting wars for him.


One example of how Muhammad encouraged Muslims to memorize verses is when he promised that those who could recite the ninety-nine names of Allah would be granted passage to heaven (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 75, Hadith 419; Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 50, Hadith 894).

Allah's Messenger revealed: Your God Allah has ninety-nine names, one hundred names minus one, and whoever learns by heart and recites them will go

Image 49

Image 50

hundred names minus one, and whoever learns by heart and recites them will go to Paradise...

But wait, there's more!

Book of Zad Al-Ma'ad, Vol. 1, p. 57-59:

Allah, all praiseworthy, has one thousand names and the prophet has one thousand names.

Notice here

Muhammad’s intention is clear: Memorizing is much more favorable to Allah than asking questions in order to understand.

Other examples include seventy rules to follow before entering the bathroom; as well as there are rules that are applied before prayer, before sex, before eating, after eating, and numerous other rules—all of these to keep Muslims busy all their lives asking silly questions about what is halal (permissible/lawful) and what is haraam (forbidden) under Islamic law.

If you speak Arabic and watch Islamic TV shows, you will hear the funniest and silliest questions and comments like:

• Is it halal to buy Christian underwear?

• Is it halal to eat ice cream, which we know is the idea of infidels?

• I am a married Muslim woman, and I have six children with my husband. Is it halal for me to kiss him first or do I have to wait for him to start?

• When I was having sex with my wife, I drank some of her breast milk. Is she haraam to me now?!

• I am a left-handed man. Does that make Satan control me, eat with me, and sleep with me? (Sahih Muslim, Book 23, Hadith 5007): Allah's Messenger, may Allah pray on him, said: “Do not feed yourself with your left hand, since Satan eats with his left hand.”

• I walked with one sandal the other day after losing it at the mosque, and the prophet forbids us to walk with one shoe. Am I going to hell? Note: It is

prophet forbids us to walk with one shoe. Am I going to hell? Note: It is forbidden that a man should eat with his left hand or walk with one sandal.

(Sahih Muslim, Book 24, Hadith 5234);

Caller: “I am a Muslim and sometimes I read books in the bathroom while I’m doing the call of nature. Can I take the Qur’an with me inside the bathroom?

Scholar: No, the bathroom is a dirty place, and the Qur’an is holy. You cannot do that. It’s forbidden;

Caller: I memorized the Qur’an since I was eight years old. What should I do then—leave my brain out when I go to the bathroom?


1. Muhammad could not give correct interpretations of the Qur’an, but he was given the authority of God on earth;

2. If Muhammad could not understand what Allah was saying, how did he know if he was executing Allah’s orders correctly?

3. Muhammad provided the verses in the Qur’an, but he could not explain the majority of them;

4. Muhammad forbade asking questions about verses that were not clear and made Islam look bad. So, are we supposed to ask questions about verses that are clear to us? Is this a joke?

5. Since Muhammad himself is ignorant about the verses in the Qur’an, this probably explains why Allah said in Qur’an 62:2 that he sent an ignorant to the ignorant!

This reminds me of a verse in the Bible that proves that the Qur’an cannot be from God (1 Corinthians 14:33):

For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.


Punishment for lesbians in the Qur’an

An-Nisa, Qur’an 4:15:

For those who are lesbian of your women, bring four witnesses on them, to testify against them. Then jail them in their houses until they die, and find His own ways.

Image 51

own ways.

If women are lesbians, the punishment is jailing them until they die. Is the punishment for gay men the same?

Punishment for gay men in Qur’an

An-Nisa, Qur’an 4:16:

If two of your men among you are guilty of homosexuality, punish them both. If they both repent, leave them alone, for Allah is accepting of repentance, Most Merciful.

What we notice in here is:

1. Gay men will not be jailed;

2. They have the chance to repent;

3. Punishment is easy for them, even if they do not repent (beating them with sandals) as we see in Ibn 'Abbas’ interpretation of Qur'an 4:16: Punish both of them, with insults and beatings with sandals; but if they repent from it, leave them alone.

Is that really a rule of a god? If Allah views this as a crime, shouldn't it be the same for a man with a man and a woman with a woman? Why is the punishment totally different; very harsh for women and so easy to men?

Some Muslims will say to you, “Oh, this verse was abrogated later.” It does not matter if your god keeps changing his mind. This is not the issue. God is about justice, but this god is not fair at all.

Why did Allah abrogate this verse? Did he find himself so wrong that he repented? A MUSLIM CANNOT EVEN TAKE HIS OWN FAMILY AS


If someone converts to Islam, he has no choice but to hate his own family and he cannot have them as friends as long they are from the non-believers (nonMuslims). Read Qur'an 9:23:

O you who believe! Take not your fathers nor your brethren as friends or protectors if they obtain happiness in disbelief rather than believe [Islam]. Those of you who take them for friends, they should blame no one but themselves.

• A Muslim cannot give you a speech that his god meant “the enemy”, when he spoke about not taking them as friends, because it's obvious that your father and mother, brothers, and sisters love you, even if they reject your faith;

• Therefore, why can't they even be just friends?

• Note here there is no condition saying if they are bad, “take them not as friends”. It's an order for all Muslims to follow and practice such verse if they have such of a case.


I always hear Muslims saying that Islam does not hate Christians. They quote you verses which have been abrogated. To abrogate means to abolish by formal or official means; annul by an authoritative act; to repeal, to abrogate a law.

With Islam, it's still in the Qur'an, but Muslims cannot follow it anymore.

Let's see how much Allah is in love with the Christians. Let me show you in Qur’an 5:51; Allah is saying:

Take not Christians and Jews as friends and protectors; they are friends to each other, and if any of you take them as friends, he is one of them and unjust to himself (which means he is out of Islam and he will be punished by death).

And is followed by his command in Qur’an 9:29:

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Judgment Day, nor forbid what Allah and His Messenger ordered to be forbidden, nor accept the religion of truth (Islam), of the People of the Book (Christians and Jews), until they pay the Jizyah (Penalty) with willing submission, and feel themselves humiliated and subdued.

Image 52

I explained how Muslims have to fight us until we either convert to Islam, or pay them Jizyah; a monthly penalty to be kept alive, of which we have to pay it with humiliation, like dogs.

Allah shows his amazing love to the Christians in this next verse! I hope every Christian will remember it forever. You need clear proof that Islam hates Christians, and this is one of the best verses to prove that point, if you want to expose Islam. Qur’an 5:14:

From those, who call themselves Christians, We did take a covenant, but they forgot part of scriptures that We (Allah) sent to them: therefore We estranged them, with enmity and hatred between the one and the other, until the Judgment day. Soon Allah will show them what it is they were doing.

In Qur’an 5:14, Allah has a plan for you as a Christian. The plan is so clear that Allah will fuel us with hate and enmity between Christians (estranged them, with enmity and hatred).

Let us study this plan of war; Allah's war on Christians 1. Allah will not make us hate the Muslims (Christians do not hate Muslims); 2. Allah will make us hate and fight each other as Christians! Allah has been so successful for a long time in this war, and many Christians are following the plan of Allah. We see Christians attacking each other's churches, but they will never open their lips against Islam.

What I am trying to say is that it's the plan of Satan to prevent us from uniting as Christians (Orthodox, Protestant, and Catholic). IT IS Allah’s plan and he is saying it in clear words, “I will divide you and make you hate each other, so that I will make the Church of Jesus Christ a divided kingdom.”

Remember, Christ said in Matthew 12:25 (KJV):

And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:

It's painful to see Christians speaking evilly against each other, but when you ask

It's painful to see Christians speaking evilly against each other, but when you ask these priests or these ministers about Islam, they do not dare to say one word! It's the plan of Allah, the Anti-Christ, to divide us. Whoever he helps in that direction is working for Allah. Read this verse again, carefully, and tell me if I am wrong.

Qur’an 5:14:

As for those who call themselves Christians, We did take a pledge, but they forgot a good part of scriptures that we sent to them. Therefore, We (Allah) estranged them, with animosity and hatred between one another, until the Judgment day. And soon will Allah show them what it is they were doing.

We should be believers and followers of Christ! Not a man. Not a bishop. Not a minister. No name, but His name! Why should we follow the sinners? See Romans 3:23 (KJV):

For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Unity with Christ is the way to His kingdom. This is what Islam fears; all of us being the good fruit of Jesus the Christ. See Romans 3:28 (KJV): Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

When Jesus comes, he will not ask you the name of your church, but for the fruit. Without the good fruit, there is hypocrisy. This is why Jesus said in Matthew 7:16 (KJV):

Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

Also see Galatians 5:22-23 (KJV):

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.

This is how we recognize Islam to be false and coming directly from Satan.

From their fruits, not only words. Most of them are liars in word. They speak skillfully, but show me your fruit and I will tell you who you are.

What I am trying to say to all of those who consider themselves Christians,

What I am trying to say to all of those who consider themselves Christians, whether Protestant, Catholic or Orthodox, do not divide the Church of Christ, for all of us are one in Him. As you see, Allah is targeting all of us, not a named church. We make Christ sad when we are not united. Do not let leaders, for their own glory, make us and turn us into something far from what Christ wants us to be. If you adhere to the plan of Allah, are you working for him?! It's a good question, to which you know the answer. See 1 Corinthians 12:13 (KJV): For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.



Sahih Muslim, Book 41, Hadith 6981:

The Messenger of Allah said: “You will be in fighting with the Jews, and you will murder them until even a rock would say: ‘Move towards here, Muslim, there is a Jew, he is hiding himself behind me, come and slaughter him.’”

Sahih Muslim, Book 41, Hadith 6985:

The Messenger of Allah said: “The judgment hour would not come until the Muslims fight against the Jews, and the Muslims would kill them all, and if a Jew hides behind a stone or a tree and the stone or the tree would shout saying:

'Oh Muslim, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him;' but the tree called Gharqaad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews!”

Even the rocks (Muslim rocks and stones) will report the Jewish men, women and children if they try to hide, so that the Muslims will do their duty and kill them all. And note here, there is a Jewish tree!


One of today’s most famous conflicts in the world is the so-called Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For most of us, all we know is that Israel is fighting with the Arab world over the land. This is true, but it is not the whole story. Most of those who debate about the conflict talk from a political point of view, and as a result try to find political solutions. Our world leaders show their ignorance by ignoring the fact that the conflict is beyond political. In fact, there is no solution

Image 53

for it except war, and only war. I'm not saying that I would love for a war to break out. I am simply stating a fact. Let's look at the following hadiths.

Sahih Muslim, Book 41, Hadith 6981:

The Messenger of Allah said, “You will be in fighting with the Jews, and you will slaughter them until even a rock will say, ‘Move towards here, Muslim.

There is a Jew hiding himself behind me. Come and slaughter him.’”

Sahih Muslim, Book 41, Hadith 6985:

The Messenger of Allah said, “The judgment hour will not approach until the Muslims fight against the Jews and the Muslims will slaughter them all, and if a Jew hides behind a rock or a tree, the rock or tree will scream saying, ‘Oh Muslim, over here is a Jew behind me. Come and kill him,’ but the tree called Gharqaad will not say, seeing that it is the tree of the Jews!’”

According to Muhammad, even rocks will betray all Jews—men, women, and children—who will hide behind them to make sure that no Jew will survive the slaughter. Muhammad doesn't call for mercy. He calls for complete elimination of Jews. Knowing this, how are we supposed to be convinced that Muslims are willing to look for a peaceful solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? This is something that will happen, and no one has ever been able to stop it from the time of Muhammad until the Day of Judgment.

Muhammad had always based his religion upon hate. It's the fuel of Islam. He tried to take the side of the Jews against the Christians with the hope that the Jews would like him for it. When that did not work, he tried to make himself look like a friend to the Christians by attacking the Jews, this time hoping to win the Christians.

In Qur'an 5:82:

You will find that the most ones who hate you are the Jewish and those who take associates with Allah, as well as the kindest people to Muslims are the ones who call themselves Christians.

Muhammad uses the so-called revelations from Allah to drive his political agenda. It shows how he switches sides whenever he feels like it, and Allah switches sides along with him. See Qur’an 2:62:

Those who believe and the Jews in addition to Christians, who do good have no worry. Allah will give them their prize, and they will not have misery or sadness.

Now in Qur'an 2:62, both the Jews and the Christians are good. They will even go to heaven.


I. Muhammad, the Man of Peace

At this stage, Muhammad was nothing. He had no power, no army, and no followers. In the first thirteen years of his prophet-hood, he only had 70

followers. He had no choice, but to remain a peaceful man. Most of the people who became his followers later were slaves as narrated by ‘Ammar Bin Yasir in the following hadith of Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 58, Hadith 197:

“I saw the Messenger of Allah, and accompanying him were the only ones who converted to Islam, five slaves, two women, and Abu Bakr.”

Notice that his five followers were still called slaves even after they accepted Islam. Muhammad still considered his brothers in faith as his slaves.

For sure, the slaves had no choice but to convert to Islam. In the beginning, Muhammad manipulated the slaves into becoming Muslims and fighting for him by promising them freedom afterwards. This is what happened to the poor man, Bilal, who converted to Islam and fought for Muhammad, but was never granted his freedom.

II. The Hijra Stage (Immigration)

This stage is exactly what Muslims practice today.

To get ready for a big war in someone else’s land, they gather themselves in that land to plan and prepare for an attack until their population is big enough to establish an army. This is what Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qa'ida did when they went to Afghanistan. They immigrated there to get ready for a big attack, and when they were ready, they attacked without mercy—exactly as Muhammad did in his time. At this stage, Muslims get their income from thievery.

Through thievery, they accomplish two goals:

• They collect wealth by taking other people’s money, animals, and goods.

• They instill terror into the hearts of the disbelievers.

Instilling terror is fundamental in Islam. It is one of the best and quickest ways to take down an enemy regardless of his size. When fear is in his heart, even an elephant will bow down to a mouse (which reminds me of Obama bowing down to the king of Saudi Arabia). Muslims understand the significant change in the enemy’s life when he is afraid. They know that all they need to do is to be patient and wait for the fear to spread and take hold. With fear in his heart, the enemy will never win. (As long as America is in fear, it will never win.) Before he became the God-on-earth in Arabia, Muhammad made more than 56

attacks against merchants, 28 of those attacked were called Gazwah (caravan riders).

III. Stage of Total War; Either You Are With Me or Against Me In this final stage, Muhammad was no longer weak. He proclaimed his agenda in more open and clear words. Anyone who did not bow down to him was killed.

All of those who refused him, especially those who opposed him—like the Jews, were killed.



We always hear the same arguments from either side of the Israeli-Palestinian debate. The Muslims say the Israelis took away their land, and the Israelis say it's rightfully theirs since Biblical times. Unfortunately, the world is filled with liberal media exemplified by TV shows like Oprah's, who until now, does not know where coffee comes from, or shows like Jon Stewart's, which make us laugh, but I am not sure at what. Beyond that is the YouTube propaganda.

Regardless of numerous outlets for information, none of them are honest enough to discuss what is truly the heart of the conflict.

Let us do a real study and find out who really belongs in Israel. We will not use the he-said-she-said argument. We will present facts, and our facts will show that Israel belongs to the Jews. We already know that Israel belongs to the Jews according to the Bible, but we will set aside the Bible and get our evidence from the Qur'an itself. This is the best way to shut up the liberals and Qur'an worshipers who do not dare to say that the Qur’an is wrong.

Many of you do not know that the Qur'an declares in very clear words that Israel,

Many of you do not know that the Qur'an declares in very clear words that Israel, or Palestine as some insist on calling it, is the land of the Jews. Let us read the following passages together:


Qur’an 5:20-26 (Usama Dakdok translaton): he made you kings, and he gave you what he did not give to anyone in the world.

21“O my people enter the holy land which Allah has prescribed for you, and do not turn away your back, so you will be turned back as losers.”

22They said, “O Moses, surely in it are giant people, and surely we will not enter it until they come out of it. So if they come out of it, so surely we will enter.”

23Then said two men among the fearers, Allah was gracious above them, “Enter on them the door, so when you enter, so surely you will be victorious in Allah, so dependable, if you were believers.”

24They said, “O Moses, surely we will never enter it as long as they are in it, so go you and your lord. So engage in war, surely we are sitting down here.”

25He said, “My lord, surely I do not own anything except myself and my brother, so differentiate between us and the transgressing people.”

26He said, “So surely it (the Promised Land) is forbidden to them forty years; they will be lost on the earth. So do not grieve on the transgressing people.”

20And when Moses said to his people, “O my people, remember the grace of Allah on you when he made prophets among you. And Now let us study each verse:

Verse 20 - We learn that the Jews are the chosen people of God, not only in the Bible, but also in the Qur'an, as we read, He (Allah) “gave you what he did not give to anyone in the world.”

Verse 21 – Allah orders the Jews to engage in war and take the land away from the inhabitants. He warns them not to turn away from war or he will punish them. “O my people enter the holy land which Allah has prescribed for you, and do not turn away your back so you will be turned back as losers.”

Verse 22 – The peaceful Jews refuse to enter and engage in war, but Allah wanted war and bloodshed. They said, “O Moses, surely in it are giant people, and surely we will not enter it until they come out of it. So if they come out of it, so surely we will enter.”

Verse 23 – Of all the Jews, two of them agreed to go to war. Allah was pleased with them and promised them victory.

Verse 24 – The Jews continue to refuse to go to war. They asked Moses why his Lord loves war. They told Moses to go with his Lord, but they are staying behind. They said, “O Moses, surely we will never enter it as long as they are in it, so go you and your lord. So engage in war, surely we are sitting down here.”

Verse 25 – Allah gives names and titles for the bad ones and the good ones.

Read with me. “He said, 'My lord, surely I do not own anything except myself and my brother, so differentiate between us and the transgressing people.’” Here, Allah made a judgment over the Jews for refusing to go and kill for the inhabitants of the land. He called them “transgressing people”.

Verse 26 – Allah becomes angry because the Jews refuse to fight and kill the giants. He punishes them with 40 years of wandering in the desert.

Now it's time to ask some questions. The Qur'an identified the inhabitants of Palestine as giants. These cannot be the same people who are called Palestinians today, because they are short and smaller than average in body size. So, who are the Palestinians? Where did they come from? The answer is easy. They are the Muslims who entered the land with 'Umar Ibn Al-Khattab in the year 717 A.D.

(Read the Pact of 'Umar.) Yasser Arafat cannot be a descendant of the giants because he is not even five feet tall.

Why did they all choose this land and called it a “holy land” (Qur’an 5:21), when no prophet of Allah lived in it yet?

Allah, himself, declared Israel as the land prepared specifically for the Jews (Qur'an 5:21), even if it meant taking it by force from the inhabitants. Muslims today say that it is not right, it's ugly, disgusting, a crime, and inhuman to take Israel (Palestine) from the Palestinians. Would the Muslims dare to say that Allah's decision to have the giants killed and driven away from Israel is not right, ugly, disgusting, a crime, and inhuman?

What is unfair is for Allah to punish the Jews by wandering through the desert for 40 years as a result of their refusal to go to war against the giants. It shows that in order for the Jews to be righteous in the eyes of Allah, they needed to kill the giants and take the holy land. Then and only then would Allah like the Jews.


Image 54

Notice that Muslims curse the Jews and Christians five times a day. Qur'an 1:7

describes both the Jews and Christians as the cursed ones: In the way of those whom You have bestowed Your grace, not like those they lost (Christian) or who earned Your anger (the Jews).

The Jews today are cursed by Muslims five times everyday for not killing all the giants (Palestinians?).

I asked a Muslim scholar in one of thousands of debates I have had, why was it okay, back then, for Allah to kill the giants. He replied that the giants at that time were not Muslims, therefore it was the duty of the believers to kill them. In Islam, that is called justice. I call it hypocrisy.

Here are my concluding points:

• Why did Allah choose this land for the Jews? Why did he assign the land to them?

• If Allah were the true God, he would have known that giving the land to the Jews would be a big mistake, and that his choice would result in an endless war lasting to this day. Since he was the one who handed down the land to the Jews, then the bloodshed seen and lived today is his own crime.

• It is so clear that Allah did not know at that time that the ones who would live in the holy land one day would be Muslims. Like I said, the giants cannot be the same people who live there today.

• Allah never mentioned the name of the Palestinians in the Qur'an. Was it because he was short of information?

• The most significant point we get from all of this is that the Qur'an itself gives proof that the claim of Muslims over Israel is false. Allah clearly states that Israel belongs to the Jews.


Qur'an 2:65:

You have been informed

about those who transgressed on Saturday, so we said to them, “Be as filthy monkeys.”

Qur'an 5:60:

Image 55

We made from them the monkeys and the pigs.

I suppose Allah was angry with the Jews who went fishing on a Saturday, the Sabbath day, so he cursed them by turning them into pigs and monkeys. My question is, why hasn't even one Jewish man or woman during the last few thousand years been transformed into a monkey or a pig?

Note that Allah never released the Jews from the Sabbath day. Note also that the curse is still active today. Take a Jewish guy fishing with you next Saturday and bring a video camera along with you. Watch if your Jewish friend becomes a monkey or pig. If he remains a man at the end of the Sabbath day, then Allah's curse must be ineffective.

Since Allah does not want Jews to do any work on Saturdays, why does he allow Muslims to work on Fridays?

Allah transformed the Jews into monkeys and pigs for fishing on the Sabbath. Here is the story in Qur’an 7:163:

Question them regarding the village standing close by the sea. Behold! They misbehaved in the concern of the Sabbath. For on the day of their Sabbath their whale did come to them, but on the day other than Saturday, they came not: this is how We arranged a trouble to them, on behalf of their sin.

Let us read Ibn Kathir’s interpretation of Qur’an 7:163 (Ibn Kathir, print. 2002, published by Dar-'Tiba, Vol. 2, p. 163):

While their fish came to them floating to the top of the water on Sabbath day, and being visible on top of the water, according to Al-Dahhak, who reported it from Ibn ‘Abbas Ibn Jarir who said, "Allah's statement (but on the day other than Saturday, they came not: this is how We arranged a trouble to them, on behalf of their sin) means, this is how We tested them by making the fish swim close to the surface of the water, on the day which they were prohibited to fish. And in remainder of the week, the fish would be hidden from them on the day when they were allowed to fish, (this is how We arranged a trouble to them,) so that We tested them...

We tested them...

The double standard of Allah is shown in this story (Qur’an 2:17): Allah hath forbidden to you dead meat, and blood, and the flesh of swine, and that on which any other name hath been invoked besides that of Allah. However, but whoever is driven to a necessity (like starving) not desiring, nor exceeding the order of Allah, no sin shall be upon him; surely, Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

• So it’s fine for a Muslim to eat pork if he has to break the law of Allah due to his hunger.

• Then why is Allah not being at all merciful toward the poor Jews, whom he caused to suffer hunger six days a week, and afterwards the fish came only on Saturday. How many weeks can the Jews fast with no food at all? Which means, it was Allah’s own handiwork and crime, and subsequently he desired to punish them for having to fish on Sabbath?

• Allah told them not to fish on Saturday, but he made the fish come only on that day!

• How will these poor men feed their family six days out of the week if Allah makes the fish disappear and he then makes it come up on top of the water on Saturday only?

• Is that justice? Allah is playing with the Jews, forcing them into hunger so they will break his orders; and subsequently he exacts his punishment on them by transforming them into rats and pigs and monkeys!

• It's very clear that the one who made up this story has an evil mind, explaining to us that Allah makes us suffer only for his human type of amusement—the enjoyment of watching little children get so hungry six days a week, all just to enhance his own self-esteem.


Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 54, Hadith 524:

It is reported by Abu Huraira: “The Prophet said, ‘A clan of children of Israel was lost. No person knows what they acted. However, I do not see them except that they were cursed (by Allah) and transfigured into rats, because if you put the milk of a she-camel in front of a rat, it will not drink it, but if you put in front of

milk of a she-camel in front of a rat, it will not drink it, but if you put in front of it the milk of a sheep, it will drink it.’ I told this to Ka'eb who asked me, ‘Did you hear this from the Prophet?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ Ka'eb asked me the same question several times; I said to Ka'eb ‘Do I read the Torah?’” (i.e. I tell you this from the prophet.).

Let us study the logic of Muhammad concerning what an animal will not accept.

What an animal does not accept as drink means the animal is from the same ethnic group as you. But Allah transformed them into that kind of animal as punishment for some wrong deed based on this?

We are going to use Muhammad’s logic of this brilliant discovery to learn about another mystery:

Donkeys do not drink whiskey or alcohol, and Muslims do not drink alcohol.

Therefore, donkeys used to be human Muslims and Allah turned them into donkeys?

Remember, I am not calling Muslims donkeys, absolutely not, but I am trying to be smart like Muhammad by using his logic. After all, isn’t he the best example to follow?

Then I have a question about how Muhammad even came up with such an idea?

Muhammad cannot stop thinking about the Jews. Even when he ordered Muslims to do things, he based his orders not on Allah’s teaching on right and wrong, but on doing the opposite of the Jews, as we see in many hadiths. A few examples follow.



Sunan Abu-Dawood, Book 2, Hadith 0652:

Reported Aws Ibn 'Thabit Al-Ansari: “The messenger of Allah said: ‘Act differently from the Jews, on behalf of they do not pray in their sandals or their shoes.’”

Can Muhammad not tell them how to pray without remembering what the Jews do? Why should Muslims be the opposite of the Jews in all things? It gets even funnier with the coming hadith in Sunan Abu-Dawood, Book 20, Hadith 3170: Reported by 'Ubadah Ibn Assamet: “The messenger of Allah used to stand up during the funeral until the corpse was placed in the grave. A learned Jew once

during the funeral until the corpse was placed in the grave. A learned Jew once passed him while he (Muhammad) was standing by a grave during a funeral, subsequently the Jew said: ‘This is how we do (meaning praying standing).’ The Prophet sat down and said: ‘Sit down and act differently from them (the Jews).’”

• Is this for real? Muhammad always prayed in the funeral standing until a Jew said this is how we do it, and then he changed to the opposite?

• Does that mean Muhammad was wrong all the time that he performed his prayer standing at graves?

• Why did Muhammad not ask Allah to teach him about the right way to do prayers instead of acting like a child when “The Prophet sat down and said: ‘Sit down and act differently from them.’”

Another example is in Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 56, Hadith 668: It was reported by Abu Huraira: “Allah's messenger said, ‘The Jews and the Christians do not dye their gray hair, as a result you shall do the opposite of what they do (which means dye your gray hair and beards).’”

It's so clear that Islam is deliberately made to be the opposite of what Christianity and Judaism stand for. As a result, if a Muslim comes to you and says, “We have the same god,” he is trying to fool you. He knows that whatever we believe or whatever we do, his prophet in every act and teaching chose to be the opposite, not because we are wrong, but just to be the opposite of us.


I am not sure if you understand how dangerous Islam is. As you've seen, Allah hates Christians and orders the Muslims to fight to kill them. There are about three billion humans who are Christian and have to be fought by Muslims. The choices are to pay in submission, convert or be killed. Add to that what the last hadith revealed. What we hear about Islam and Muslims from political leaders, like Obama and other western liars, is ignorance. Their foolishness is making them blind. All they care about is just pushing it away until tomorrow to see what is coming!

What is coming is ugly. The earth will be covered with blood, for Islam is a beast hungry for blood. Some might say, “What about some Islamic countries that signed a peace agreement with Israel?” Yes, it's true, but it's temporary, until

Image 56

Image 57

that signed a peace agreement with Israel?” Yes, it's true, but it's temporary, until Muslims have the power to take Israel and the entire West down, as we see Allah ordered in the Qur’an. It is explained in Qur'an 47:35: Cry not and ask not for

peace as long you have the uppermost and the strength and Allah will reward you for your deeds.

It's so clear that Muslims are not allowed to go for peace, because Islam is against any kind of peace. There are conditions when Muslims can agree about peace, and Allah approves it as long as it's temporary. If Muslims cannot beat the Jews, it's okay to have a treaty. Muhammad did this himself with the Christians and the Jews. He did this when he was weak. If he had gone to war, he would have lost, and they would have been able to kill him easily, so Muhammad signed a peace agreement and then broke it when he became strong as we see in Qur'an 9:1:

Freedom from any obligation or promise or treaty of peace from Allah and His messenger toward those of the Mushrikeen (pagans and Christians and Jews) with whom ye made a treaty.

As simple as that is, why would any country in the world trust a treaty made by Muslims? It's based on foolishness and ignorance. This is what Israel is facing now. They are being forced by the USA Government to accept such treaties.

Soon Iranian Muslims will have their nuclear weapons, which some Muslim countries already have. I guess the party of bloodshed will start in less than 25

years. It's just a matter of time when we will see the Muslim population growing fast in the West, and then they will force their own agenda over the world. They might even be able to use western countries’ nuclear weapons to destroy Israel, and then they could nuke any country that does not accept Islam. I am saying, if they could!

I am convinced that if Muslims had an army as powerful as the United States’

army, they would make one speech saying, “You've got three days. Either you convert or you die.”

Image 58

This is why Muhammad sent three letters to the three kings of the three largest kingdoms around him at that time, threatening them to convert or go to war!

Terror was the way for Muhammad to have victory. Read Qur'an 8:12: When Allah inspires the angels that I am with you (Muslims) I will cast terror into the hearts of the Disbelievers, so cut their neck and every finger tip of them.

This is how the Muslims made George W. Bush go to the mosque like a puppy.

The same happened for all who came after, even from Hillary Clinton to Obama.

Many after them will bow to Muslim kings, because they are afraid of the Islamic terror.

Maybe you do not understand what I am trying to say yet! How many movies have been made against Christ? How many books? How many lies? At the same time, who dares to speak or to make a movie against Muhammad?! Why, even in Hollywood, did they have a conference to change the way they look at the Islamic world, and then forced all movie makers to make positive movies about Muslims?

Terror is powerful! They will try to silence anyone who will speak the truth.


The normal answer should be no way, right? It does not make sense that any religion would allow that! The fact is hard to believe, but it's the truth. Islam permits lying!

There are two kinds of lies in Islam:

1. Lies to non-Muslims about anything. Especially about Islam (to cover up bad things);

2. Lies to Muslims.

We will take a look at the first principle in Qur’an 3:28: The believers are not allowed to take disbelievers to be their friends instead of the believers. Whoso does that, he hath no connection with Allah, unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them, taking to as it where security. Allah warns you from himself. Unto Allah is your destiny.

Image 59

This verse is often seen as the primary verse that sanctions deception towards non-Muslims. Believers (Muslims) cannot take disbelievers (infidels/nonMuslims) for friends and allies instead of believers. Whoever does this shall have no relationship left with Allah unless you “guard yourselves against them,” with some translations adding, “taking precautions." This is something that all Muslims know. It's called Taqiyya, ﻳ

ﺖ ة

(defensive deception). If we ask

Muslims about lying, they will recite the same verse when answering you. They will say this is about war, as if someone is an enemy who puts a sword to your neck asking you if you are Muslim. If you say yes, he will kill you! Allah is saying you can lie to save yourself from them.

Is that true? YES and NO!

The verse gives Muslims all kinds of rights to protect themselves. Muslims have been told that all non-Muslims are enemies. They can lie to their enemies. This is how they always see you. As an enemy, not as you see them.

If I have a Muslim living next door to me, I am an enemy as revealed in Qur’an 5:51 (Yusuf Ali translation):

O ye who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other, and he among you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily, Allah guides not the unjust people.

But you may say, “He (my neighbor) calls me every morning to say, ‘Good morning, my friend!’”. Well, this is Taqiyya. It's a lie to survive until they have the upper hand. To prove my point, let's see the verse and the Muslims’

interpretation of it; not mine. Go to the Qur'an commentary, Tafsir Ibn 'Abbas (Mokrane Guezzou translation), and read the explanation of this verse: By taking the kafir and disbelievers as friends, he hath no connection with Allah, has no honor, mercy or safety from Allah; unless it be that ye but safeguard yourselves against them, maintain yourselves from them, taking as it were safety-measures saving yourselves from them by speaking in a kindly way towards them with, while your hearts hate this.

This verse is telling Muslims not to take disbelievers as friends instead of the

Image 60

Image 61

This verse is telling Muslims not to take disbelievers as friends instead of the believers, for the one who befriends any disbeliever, receives no protection from Allah, unless he is taking them as friends for protection. Allah himself warns him, and to Allah are all orders.