Slaying the Dragon by Misconi Lutfi - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

CHRISTIAN CITY COSTANTINOPLE BESEIGED SAVAGELY BY THE OTTOMAN TURKS

Turks are families chiefly Muslims united in a Turkish language made up of mixed barbaric races including West China, the Tatars (Kazakhs, Uzbeks, and Kyrgyz) and Siberia.  They were converted to Islam in the 10th century.  The Ottoman Empire was claimed by them (1300S-1923).  Mohammad the second took the capital Constantinople of the Byzantine Empire to make it a Turkish capital, the name then changed to Istanbul (1930).

            At the fall of Constantinople, the streets of Istanbul were literally red with the Christian blood in evidence of Islam barbarity.

            The Turks forced the populations of the frontier region of Macedonia and the north of Bulgaria to convert, notably in the XVI and XVII centuries.  Those who refused were executed or burnt alive.

            Anyone who thinks that the prophet was a wise and tolerant ruler and lawgiver is certainly has very little knowledge of him.  He was a vehicle of prejudices and a weapon against Christianity.  He is the Satan son in the Book of Revelation.

            Many people started many religions, cults and movements but none of them grew as big as Islam.  These proves the validity of St. John’s Revelations i.e. having millions of people blindly following a false religion but have never examined the arguments against the sincerity of Mohammad.  He is a bastard hind of messiah and has enough sixes to declare him, the wanted man for the truth.

            The Scottish historian and philosopher Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881).  He described Mohammad in his book “on heroes” (1841) as “an uncultured semi-barbarous Son of Nature, much of the Bedouin still clinging to him.

            “The very falsehoods of Mahomet are truer than the truths.

Muhammad cannot have been an impostor.  Why not?  It is inconceivable that so many people could have been taken in by a mere trickster and insincere fraud.  His genuineness lies in the success of his religion-truth by numbers provided by fear ingredients i.e. “fear to secure”.