Studies on the Psychology of Sex, Volume 5 by Havelock Ellis. - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

431-433) presents the case of a neurotic man who from the age of 15 had

been sexually excited by the sight of animals or by contact with them. He

had repeatedly had connection with cows and mares; he was also sexually

excited by sheep, donkeys, and dogs, whether female or male; the normal

sexual instinct was weak and he experienced very slight attraction to

women.

[42] Moll also remarks ("Perverse Sexualempfindung," in Senator's and

Kaminer's _Krankheiten und Ehe_) that in this matter it is often hardly

possible to draw a sharp line between vice and disease.

[43] Instances of this widespread belief--found among the Tamils of Ceylon

as well as in Europe--are quoted from various authors by Bloch, _Beiträge

zur Ætiologie der Psychopathia Sexualis_, Teil II, p.

278, and Moll,

_Untersuchungen über die Libido Sexualis_, bd. i, p.

700. On the frequency

of bestiality, from one cause or another, in the East, see, e.g., Stern,

_Medizin und Geschlechtsleben in der Türkei_, bd. ii, p.

219.

[44] Sometimes (as among the Aleuts) the animal pantomime dances of

savages may represent the transformation of a captive bird into a lovely

woman who falls exhausted into the arms of the hunter.

(H.H. Bancroft,

_Native Races of the Pacific_, vol. i, p. 93.) A system of beliefs which

accepts the possibility that a human being may be latent in an animal

obviously favors the practice of bestiality.

[45] For an example of the primitive confusion between the intercourse of

women with animals and with men see, e.g., Boas, "Sagen aus

British-Columbia," _Zeitschrift für Ethnologie_, heft V, p. 558.

[46] Herodotus, Book II, Chapter 46.

[47] Dulare (_Des Divinités Génératrices_, Chapter II) brings together the

evidence showing that in Egypt women had connection with the sacred goat,

apparently in order to secure fertility.

[48] Various facts and references bearing on this subject are brought

together by Blumenbach, _Anthropological Memoirs_, translated by Bendyshe,

p. 80; Block, _Beiträge zur Ætiologie der Psychopathia Sexualis_, Teil II,

pp. 276-283; also Ploss and Bartels, _Das Weib_, seventh edition, p. 520.

[49] Mantegazza mentions (_Gli Amori degli Uomini_, cap V) that at Rimini

a young goatherd of the Apennines, troubled with dyspepsia and nervous

symptoms, told him this was due to excesses with the goats in his care. A

finely executed marble group of a satyr having connection with a goat,

found at Herculaneum and now in the Naples Museum (reproduced in Fuchs's

_Erotische Element in der Karikatur_), perhaps symbolizes a traditional

and primitive practice of the goatherd.

[50] Bayle (_Dictionary_, Art, Bathyllus) quotes various authorities

concerning the Italian auxiliaries in the south of France in the sixteenth

century and their custom of bringing and using goats for this purpose.

Warton in the eighteenth century was informed that in Sicily priests in

confession habitually inquired of herdsmen if they had anything to do with

their sows. In Normandy priests are advised to ask similar questions.

[51] It is worth noting that in Greek the work choiros means both a sow

and a woman's pudenda; in the _Acharnians_ Aristophanes plays on this

association at some length. The Romans also (as may be gathered from

Varro's _De Re Rustica_) called the feminine pudenda _porcus_.

[52] Schurig, _Gynæcologia_, pp. 280-387; Bloch, op.

cit., 270-277. The

Arabs, according to Kocher, chiefly practice bestiality with goats, sheep

and mares. The Annamites, according to Mondière, commonly employ sows and

(more especially the young women) dogs. Among the Tamils of Ceylon

bestiality with goats and cows is said to be very prevalent.

[53] Mantegazza (_Gli Amori degli Uomini_, cap. V) brings together some

facts bearing on this matter.

V.

Exhibitionism--Illustrative Cases--A Symbolic Perversion of Courtship--The

Impulse to Defile--The Exhibitionist's Psychic Attitude-

-The Sexual Organs

as Fetichs--Phallus Worship--Adolescent Pride in Sexual Development--Exhibitionism of the Nates--The Classification of the Forms

of Exhibitionism--Nature of the Relationship of Exhibitionism to Epilepsy.

There is a remarkable form of erotic symbolism--very definite and standing

clearly apart from all other forms--in which sexual gratification is

experienced in the simple act of exhibiting the sexual organ to persons of

the opposite sex, usually by preference to young and presumably innocent

persons, very often children. This is termed exhibitionism.[54] It would

appear to be a not very infrequent phenomenon, and most women, once or

more in their lives, especially when young, have encountered a man who has

thus deliberately exposed himself before them.

The exhibitionist, though often a young and apparently vigorous man, is

always satisfied with the mere act of self-exhibition and the emotional

reaction which that act produces; he makes no demands on the woman to whom

he exposes himself; he seldom speaks, he makes no effort to approach her;

as a rule, he fails even to display the signs of sexual excitation. His

desires are completely gratified by the act of exhibition and by the

emotional reaction it arouses in the woman. He departs satisfied and

relieved.

A case recorded by Schrenck-Notzing very well represents both the

nature of the impulse felt by the exhibitionist and the way in

which it may originate. It is the case of a business man of 49,

of neurotic heredity, an affectionate husband and father of a

family, who, to his own grief and shame, is compelled from time

to time to exhibit his sexual organs to women in the street. As a

boy of 10 a girl of 12 tried to induce him to coitus; both had

their sexual parts exposed. From that time sexual contacts, as of

his own naked nates against those of a girl, became attractive,

as well as games in which the boys and girls in turn marched

before each other with their sexual parts exposed, and also

imitation of the copulation of animals. Coitus was first

practiced about the age of 20, but sight and touch of the woman's

sexual parts were always necessary to produce sexual excitement.

It was also necessary--and this consideration is highly important

as regards the development of the tendency to exhibition--that

the woman should be excited by the sight of his organs. Even when

he saw or touched a woman's parts orgasm often occurred. It was

the naked sexual organs in an otherwise clothed body which

chiefly excited him. He was not possessed of a high degree of

potency. Girls between the ages of 10 and 17 chiefly excited him,

and especially if he felt that they were quite ignorant of sexual

matters. His self-exhibition was a sort of psychic defloration,

and it was accompanied by the idea that other people felt as he

did about the sexual effects of the naked organs, that he was

shocking but at the same time sexually exciting a young girl. He

was thus gratifying himself through the belief that he was

causing sexual gratification to an innocent girl.

This man was

convicted several times, and was finally declared to be suffering

from impulsive insanity. (Schrenck-Notzing, _Kriminal-psychologische und Psycho-pathologische Studien_, 1902,

pp. 50-57.) In another case of Schrenck-Notzing's, an actor and

portrait painter, aged 31, in youth masturbated and was fond of

contemplating the images of the sexual organs of both sexes,

finding little pleasure in coitus. At the age of 24, at a bathing

establishment, he happened to occupy a compartment next to that

occupied by a lady, and when naked he became aware that his

neighbor was watching him through a chink in the partition. This

caused him powerful excitement and he was obliged to masturbate.

Ever since he has had an impulse to exhibit his organs and to

masturbate in the presence of women. He believes that the sight

of his organs excites the woman (Ib., pp. 57-68).

The presence of

masturbation in this case renders it untypical as a case of

exhibitionism. Moll at one time went so far as to assert that

when masturbation takes place we are not entitled to admit

exhibitionism, (_Untersuchungen über die Libido Sexualis_, bd. i,

p. 661), but now accepts exhibitionism with masturbation

("Perverse Sexualempfindung," _Krankheiten und Ehe_). The act of

exhibition itself gratifies the sexual impulse, and usually it

suffices to replace both tumescence and detumescence.

A fairly typical case, recorded by Krafft-Ebing, is that of a

German factory worker of 37, a good, sober and intelligent

workman. His parents were healthy, but one of his mother's and

also one of his father's sisters were insane; some of his

relatives are eccentric in religion. He has a languishing

expression and a smile of self-complacency. He never had any

severe illness, but has always been eccentric and imaginative,

much absorbed in romances (such as Dumas's novels) and fond of

identifying himself with their heroes. No signs of epilepsy. In

youth moderate masturbation, later moderate coitus.

He lives a

retired life, but is fond of elegant dress and of ornament.

Though not a drinker, he sometimes makes himself a kind of punch

which has a sexually exciting effect on him. The impulse to

exhibitionism has only developed in recent years.

When the

impulse is upon him he becomes hot, his heart beats violently,

the blood rushes to his head, and he is oblivious of everything

around him that is not connected with his own act.

Afterwards he

regards himself as a fool and makes vain resolutions never to

repeat the act. In exhibition the penis is only half erect and

ejaculation never occurs. (He is only capable of coitus with a

woman who shows great attraction to him.) He is satisfied with

self-exhibition, and believes that he thus gives pleasure to the

woman, since he himself receives pleasure in contemplating a

woman's sexual parts. His erotic dreams are of self-exhibition to

young and voluptuous women. He had been previously punished for

an offense of this kind; medico-legal opinion now recognized the

incriminated man's psychopathic condition. (Krafft-Ebing, _Op.

cit._, pp. 492-494.)

Trochon has reported the case of a married man of 33, a worker in

a factory, who for several years had exhibited himself at

intervals to shop-girls, etc., in a state of erection, but

without speaking or making other advances. He was a hard-working,

honest, sober man of quiet habits, a good father to his family

and happy at home. He showed not the slightest sign of insanity.

But he was taciturn, melancholic and nervous; a sister was an

idiot. He was arrested, but on the report of the experts that he

committed these acts from a morbid impulse he could not control

he was released. (Trochon, _Archives de l'Anthropologie

Criminelle_, 1888, p. 256.)

In a case of Freyer's (_Zeitschrift für Medizinalbeamte_, third

year, No. 8) the occasional connection of exhibitionism with

epilepsy is well illustrated by a barber's assistant, aged 35,

whose father suffered from chronic alcoholism and was also said

to have committed the same kind of offense as his son. The mother

and a sister suffered nervously. From ages of 7 to 18 the subject

had epileptic convulsions. From 16 to 21 he indulged in normal

sexual intercourse. At about that time he had often to pass a

playground and at times would urinate there; it happened that the

children watched him with curiosity. He noticed that when thus

watched sexual excitement was caused, inducing erection and even

ejaculation. He gradually found pleasure in this kind of sexual

gratification; finally he became indifferent to coitus. His

erotic dreams, though still usually about normal coitus, were now

sometimes concerned with exhibition before little girls. When

overcome by the impulse he could see and hear nothing around him,

though he did not lose consciousness. After the act was over he

was troubled by his deed. In all other respects he was entirely

reasonable. He was imprisoned many times for exhibiting himself

to young schoolgirls, sometimes vaunting the beauty of his organs

and inviting inspection. On one occasion he underwent mental

examination, but was considered to be mentally sound. He was

finally held to be a hereditarily tainted individual with

neuropathic constitution. The head was abnormally broad, penis

small, patellar reflex absent, and there were many signs of

neurasthenia. (Krafft-Ebing, _Op. cit._, pp. 490-492.)

The prevalence of epilepsy among exhibitionists is shown by the

observations of Pelanda in Verona. He has recorded six cases of

this perversion, all of which eventually reached the asylum and

were either epileptics or with epileptic relations.

One had a

brother who was also an exhibitionist. In some cases the penis

was abnormally large, in others abnormally small.

Several had

very weak sexual impulse; one, at the age of 62, had never

effected coitus, and was proud of the fact that he was still a

virgin, considering, he would say, the epoch of demoralization in

which we live. (Pelanda, "Pornopatici," _Archivio di Psichiatria_, fasc. ii-iv, 1889.)

In a very typical case of exhibitionism which Garnier has

recorded, a certain X., a gentleman engaged in business in Paris,

had a predilection for exhibiting himself in churches, more

especially in Saint-Roch. He was arrested several times for

exposing his sexual organs here before ladies in prayer. In this

way he finally ruined his commercial position in Paris and was

obliged to establish himself in a small provincial town. Here

again he soon exposed himself in a church and was again sent to

prison, but on his liberation immediately performed the same act

in the same church in what was described as a most imperturbable

manner. Compelled to leave the town, he returned to Paris, and in

a few weeks' time was again arrested for repeating his old

offense in Saint Roch. When examined by Garnier, the information

he supplied was vague and incomplete, and he was very embarrassed

in the attempt to explain himself. He was unable to say why he

chose a church, but he felt that it was to a church that he must

go. He had, however, no thought of profanation and no wish to

give offense. "Quite the contrary!" he declared. He had the sad

and tired air of a man who is dominated by a force stronger than

his will. "I know," he added, "what repulsion my conduct must

inspire. Why am I made thus? Who will cure me?" (P.

Garnier,

"Perversions Sexuelles," _Comptes Rendus_, International Congress

of Medicine at Paris in 1900, _Section de Psychiatrie_, pp.

433-435.)

In some cases, it would appear, the impulse to exhibitionism may

be overcome or may pass away. This result is the more likely to

come about in those cases in which exhibitionism has been largely

conditioned by chronic alcoholism or other influences tending to

destroy the inhibiting and restraining action of the higher

centers, which may be overcome by hygiene and treatment. In this

connection I may bring forward a case which has been communicated

to me by a medical correspondent in London. It is that of an

actor, of high standing in his profession and extremely

intelligent, 49 years of age, married and father of a large

family. He is sexually vigorous and of erotic temperament. His

general health has always been good, but he is a high-strung,

neurotic man, with quick mental reactions. His habits had for a

long time been decidedly alcoholic, but two years ago, a small

quantity of albumen being found in the urine, he was persuaded to

leave off alcohol, and has since been a teetotaller.

Though

ordinarily very reticent about sexual matters, he began four or

five years ago to commit acts of exhibitionism, exposing himself

to servants in the house and occasionally to women in the

country. This continued after the alcohol had been abandoned and

lasted for several years, though the attention of the police was

never attracted to the matter, and so far as possible he was

quietly supervised by his friends. Nine months after, the acts of

exhibitionism ceased, apparently in a spontaneous manner, and

there has so far been no relapse.

Exhibitionism is an act which, on the face of it, seems nonsensical and

meaningless, and as such, as an inexplicable act of madness, it has

frequently been treated both by writers on insanity and on sexual

perversion. "These acts are so lacking in common sense and intelligent

reflection that no other reason than insanity can be offered for the

patient," Ball concluded.[55] Moll, also, who defines exhibitionism

somewhat too narrowly as a condition in which "the charm of the exhibition

lies for the subject in the display itself," not sufficiently taking into

consideration the imagined effect on the spectator, concludes that "the

psychological basis of exhibitionism is at present by no means cleared

up."[56]

We may probably best approach exhibitionism by regarding it as

fundamentally a symbolic act based on a perversion of courtship. The

exhibitionist displays the organ of sex to a feminine witness, and in the

shock of modest sexual shame by which she reacts to that spectacle, he

finds a gratifying similitude of the normal emotions of coitus.[57] He

feels that he has effected a psychic defloration.

Exhibitionism is thus analogous, and, indeed, related, to the

impulse felt by many persons to perform indecorous acts or tell

indecent stories before young and innocent persons of the

opposite sex. This is a kind of psychic exhibitionism, the

gratification it causes lying exactly, as in physical

exhibitionism, in the emotional confusion which it is felt to

arouse. The two kinds of exhibitionism may be combined in the

same person: Thus, in a case reported by Hoche (p.

97), the

exhibitionist an intellectual and highly educated man, with a

doctor's degree, also found pleasure in sending indecent poems

and pictures to women, whom, however, he made no attempt to

seduce; he was content with the thought of the emotions he

aroused or believed that he aroused.

It is possible that within this group should come the agent in

the following incident which was lately observed by a lady, a

friend of my own. An elderly man in an overcoat was seen standing

outside a large and well-known draper's shop in the outskirts of

London; when able to attract the attention of any of the

shop-girls or of any girl in the street he would fling back his

coat and reveal that he was wearing over his own clothes a

woman's chemise (or possibly bodice) and a woman's drawers; there

was no exposure. The only intelligible explanation of this action

would seem to be that pleasure was experienced in the mild shock

of interested surprise and injured modesty which this vision was

imagined to cause to a young girl. It would thus be a

comparatively innocent form of psychic defloration.

It is of interest to point out that the sexual symbolism of active

flagellation is very closely analogous to this symbolism of exhibitionism.

The flagellant approaches a woman with the rod (itself a symbol of the

penis and in some countries bearing names which are also applied to that

organ) and inflicts on an intimate part of her body the signs of blushing

and the spasmodic movements which are associated with sexual excitement,

while at the same time she feels, or the flagellant imagines that she

feels, the corresponding emotions of delicious shame.[58] This is an even

closer mimicry of the sexual act than the exhibitionist attains, for the

latter fails to secure the consent of the woman nor does he enjoy any

intimate contact with her naked body. The difference is connected with the

fact that the active flagellant is usually a more virile and normal person

than the exhibitionist. In the majority of cases the exhibitionist's

sexual impulse is very feeble, and as a rule he is either to some degree a

degenerate, or else a person who is suffering from an early stage of

general paralysis, dementia, or some other highly enfeebling cause of

mental disorganization, such as chronic alcoholism.

Sexual feebleness is

further indicated by the fact that the individuals selected as witnesses

are frequently mere children.

It seems probable that a form of erotic symbolism somewhat

similar to exhibitionism is to be found in the rare cases in

which sexual gratification is derived from throwing ink, acid or

other defiling liquids on women's dresses. Thoinot has recorded a

case of this kind (_Attentats aux Moeurs_, 1898, pp.

484, _et

seq._). An instructive case has been presented by Moll. In this

case a young man of somewhat neuropathic heredity had as a youth

of 16 or 17, when romping with his young sister's playfellows,

experienced sexual sensations on chancing to see their white

underlinen. From that time white underlinen and white dresses

became to him a fetich and he was only attracted to women so

attired. One day, at the age of 25, when crossing the street in

wet weather with a young lady in a white dress, a passing vehicle

splashed the dress with mud. This incident caused him strong

sexual excitement, and from that time he had the impulse to throw

ink, perchloride of iron, etc., on to ladies' white dresses, and

sometimes to cut and tear them, sexual excitement and ejaculation

taking place every time he effected this. (Moll,

"Gutachten über

einem Sexual Perversen [Besudelungstrieb],"

_Zeitschrift für

Medizinalbeamte_, Heft XIII, 1900). Such a case is of

considerable psychological interest. Thoinot considers that in

these cases the fleck is a fetich. That is an incorrect account

of the matter. In this case the white garments constituted the

primary fetich, but that fetich becomes more acutely realized,

and at the same time both parties are thrown into an emotional

state which to the fetichist becomes a mimicry of coitus, by the

act of defilement. We may perhaps connect with this phenomenon

the attraction which muddy shoes often exert over the

shoe-fetichist, and the curious way in which, as we have seen (p.

18), Restif de la Bretonne associates his love of neatness in

women with his attraction to the feet, the part, he remarks,

least easy to keep clean.

Garnier applied the term _sadi-fetichism_ to active flagellation

and many similar manifestations such as we are here concerned

with, on the grounds that they are hybrids which combine the

morbid adoration for a definite object with the impulse to

exercise a more or less degree of violence. From the standpoint

of the conception of erotic symbolism I have adopted there is no

need for this term. There is here no hybrid combination of two