The Philosophy of the Sitra Achra by Denys Spirin - HTML preview
Download the book in PDF, ePub for a complete version.
![]() | ![]() |

Preface

What the tradition calls the Sitra Achra is two different things wearing one name.
The first is the underside of the Tree. Every station of the Tree is formed by cutting something off, and what it cuts off does not vanish; it settles beneath that same station as its Qliphah. The later maps chart this by pairing each holy power with a dark counterpart, the filth the Kabbalist fought below the world. None of this is foreign. It is what the Tree leaves behind, the price of each division it made, disowned and given the name of an enemy.
The second was never the Tree's at all. No map holds it, because every map has the shape of a Tree, while this precedes any Tree. The principle of oneness arose by sealing one side of this primordial cut and spent its whole descent ranking the other below the One. Orthodox Kabbalah buried it. The Left-Hand Path that turned toward the dark took the first thing for the second, worked the back of the Tree, and called it the primordial.
We pass through Kabbalah because it gave oneness its most exact form, and we argue with modern philosophy and with those Left-Hand Path currents that approach the same ground. We affirm one thing at the end, once the ground is cleared, and offer no throne to occupy and no ladder to climb, only a way of seeing what oneness sealed and the one move left unmade.


