Ontology of Differentiation: Being, Consciousness, and the Game by Denys Spirin - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.
image
image
image

​Quality as a Form of Differentiation

image

Quality is neither a property of an isolated thing, nor does it exclusively belong to the differentiator, nor can it be reduced to the result of an internal act. Within the ontology of differentiation proposed here, quality must be understood as a form of stable interaction between the differentiating and the differentiated. It emerges not as an internal characteristic but as a modality of differentiation sustained within a relational structure. Quality, therefore, is not something that belongs to one side alone; rather, it manifests within the ontological relationality of differentiated entities.

A node, as previously shown, represents structured differentiation localized within a spatiotemporal form. Yet, a node in isolation does not possess qualitative determination. Quality does not arise within the isolated node but within the system where the node differentiates and is differentiated—in the relationality of a node to other nodes. Thus, quality is the form of differentiation stably structured within the configuration of differentiating entities.

From this follows that quality is not an absolute characteristic but a positional difference retained within an ontological configuration. It is shaped through stable relationality among differentiated nodes and persists as long as the pattern of differentiation remains unchanged. Quality is thus a form of difference stable within a given system but potentially mutable with changes in relationality. For example, in logic, quality may be represented as a difference between two states in a binary system (0 and 1), where “quality” (such as "true" or "false") arises not within states themselves but through their relationality within a logical operation (such as OR or AND).

This clarifies why the same differentiation can manifest as different qualities when the systemic configuration changes. The differentiated retains logical identity, yet its qualitative determination shifts as the nodes through which it is differentiated change. What appears as "warm" in one system of differentiation may appear as "cold" in another; what is differentiated as "calm" in one context may be "inert" in another. Quality, therefore, is not inherent in the differentiated itself but arises due to its incorporation into a specific relationality of differentiating entities.

Quality is not a modification of subjective perception, as differentiation does not presuppose a subject as its condition. Quality emerges not as sensation but as the structural stability of differentiation. Phenomenologically described "sensations of quality"—such as taste, color, or temperature—are here understood as stable differentiations within the ontological scene, requiring no subjective act of perception.

Formally, quality can be defined as a secondary level of differentiation arising within a system wherein differentiating entities mutually differentiate each other. It is neither an essence nor an attribute; rather, it expresses a modality of relative differentiation, stable within the given configuration. In this sense, quality is a measure of the differentiated’s difference, fixed at the systemic level but rooted in none of its elements individually.

This definition of quality allows overcoming the dichotomy between the subjective and objective. Quality is not subjective, as it does not depend upon an observer; yet neither is it objective, as it does not belong to an object as an independent entity. Quality is ontologically relational, and it is precisely in this relational status that it finds stability.

Thus, a change of quality is not the result of a mental shift but an ontological transformation within the system of differences retaining that particular differentiation. Quality disappears or transforms when the structure holding differentiation alters. Such a change can be minimal (e.g., when the relational background shifts) or profound (when the entire ontological scene changes), but in both cases, it results from restructuring relationality among differentiating entities, rather than from subjective action.

​

Find Your Next Great Read

Describe what you're looking for in as much detail as you'd like.
Our AI reads your request and finds the best matching books for you.

Showing results for ""

Popular searches:

Romance Mystery & Thriller Self-Help Sci-Fi Business