
Platos Gorgias
SOCRATES: Then they do not exceed in pain?
POLUS: True.
POLUS: No.
SOCRATES: And would you prefer a greater evil or a greater dishonour to a less one? Answer, Polus, and fear SOCRATES: But if not in pain, then not in both?
not; for you will come to no harm if you nobly resign yourself into the healing hand of the argument as to a physician POLUS: Certainly not.
without shrinking, and either say Yes or No to me.
SOCRATES: Then they can only exceed in the other?
POLUS: I should say No.
POLUS: Yes.
SOCRATES: Would any other man prefer a greater to a less evil?
SOCRATES: That is to say, in evil?
POLUS: No, not according to this way of putting the case, POLUS: True.
Socrates.
SOCRATES: Then doing injustice will have an excess of evil, SOCRATES: Then I said truly, Polus, that neither you, and will therefore be a greater evil than suffering injustice?
nor I, nor any man, would rather do than suffer injustice; for to do injustice is the greater evil of the two.
POLUS: Clearly.
POLUS: That is the conclusion.
SOCRATES: But have not you and the world already agreed that to do injustice is more disgraceful than to suffer?
SOCRATES: You see, Polus, when you compare the two kinds of refutations, how unlike they are. All men, with the POLUS: Yes.
exception of myself, are of your way of thinking; but your single assent and witness are enough for me,I have no SOCRATES: And that is now discovered to be more evil?
need of any other, I take your suffrage, and am regardless 93
Platos Gorgias
of the rest. Enough of this, and now let us proceed to the SOCRATES: And if the striker strikes violently or quickly, next question; which is, Whether the greatest of evils to a that which is struck will he struck violently or quickly?
guilty man is to suffer punishment, as you supposed, or whether to escape punishment is not a greater evil, as I sup-POLUS: True.
posed. Consider:You would say that to suffer punishment is another name for being justly corrected when you do SOCRATES: And the suffering to him who is stricken is of wrong?
the same nature as the act of him who strikes?
POLUS: I should.
POLUS: Yes.
SOCRATES: And would you not allow that all just things SOCRATES: And if a man burns, there is something which are honourable in so far as they are just? Please to reflect, is burned?
and tell me your opinion.
POLUS: Certainly.
POLUS: Yes, Socrates, I think that they are.
SOCRATES: And if he burns in excess or so as to cause SOCRATES: Consider again:Where there is an agent, pain, the thing burned will be burned in the same way?
must there not also be a patient?
POLUS: Truly.
POLUS: I should say so.
SOCRATES: And if he cuts, the same argument holds
SOCRATES: And will not the patient suffer that which the there will be something cut?
agent does, and will not the suffering have the quality of the action? I mean, for example, that if a man strikes, there POLUS: Yes.
must be something which is stricken?
SOCRATES: And if the cutting be great or deep or such as POLUS: Yes.
will cause pain, the cut will be of the same nature?
Describe what you're looking for in as much detail as you'd like.
Our AI reads your request and finds the best matching books for you.
Popular searches:
Join 2 million readers and get unlimited free ebooks