Perfect Reasoning by Tiro Phenyo Nkau - HTML preview
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronically or mechanically including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written consent from Tiro Phenyo Nkau.
All non-descript concepts and formulas within this document are the sole intellectual property of Tiro Phenyo Nkau.
©Tiro Phenyo Nkau
Email: phenyo.nkau@gmail.com
All rights reserved.
Our energies actually come from our characters. This is because our souls are made from perfect reasoning build ups. This is the same reason it's important to connect our intelligences with as much perfect truths as possible. The accumulation has results on the substance of our souls. The inverse of this effect lies behind the fact that imperfection reasoning accumulates over time and can also render a person insane because our thoughts are based on the type of energy(reasoning) that lies within our own souls. This book is dedicated to my family because I do love their perfections that much and I do hope that the growth it sustains grows with them as well.
Time proved that unrealness exists by becoming its consequence. Thought proved that reasoning can actually exist as form of realness. Movement is a consequence of change. Consistency itself becomes more real because as a circle, it is consistent all the way round except within its realness, of which it becomes the realization of consistency as a sphere where it is consistent all the way round, even within its realness. Consistency does grow within its realness and so does everything else.
Reasoning moments
1. Perfection realises itself. This can be seen in how it sits as both the perfect condition and change(time) which allows for its own self-realization to exist.
Perfection within this context, defines the perfect condition for any type of realness to exist.
2. Unrealness - Unrealness exists for no reason which means it has no form of reasoning or consistency inside it.
3. Space - Reasoning has become real by splitting into two parts which happen to be reasoning and consistency. These two consistencies are concepts which are derived from the inverse of unrealness which also comes from the condition that unrealness is real because its unrealness is consistent. The because and consistent part of this condition as a statement, is also the reason why reasoning and consistency exist in the first place. Their cause has a strong basis.
4. Logic - Reasoning and consistency have split in infinite ways to become the allowances for probabilities. Reasoning now exists twice within its own depth which happens to be the cause of having an actual source of existence which is space. This while time becomes its purpose as an allowance for the improvement
5. Consciousness - The infinite splitting up of reasoning and consistency has become an actual realization in the form of a type of reasoning with movement capabilities.
6. Reality - Reasoning and consistency have become actual realnesses to sit as plans, improvements and results. Reasoning now exists to build up on other forms of realnesses and their overall purposes.
7. The concept of perfection has become infinitely real.
Empty reasoning can only create space, nothing else.
The first equation in eternity
The first equation in eternity sits as a process of concept isolation growth.
Unrealness is divided into three parts within its consistencies and that division carries forward to become the infinite division of reasoning and consistency to become the allowance for logic to exist.
- - - = ÷ of + within 0 using - as a form of reasoning.
The three consistencies that are divided within the concept of space, are reasoning, consistency and change. To put it in a more literal term, unrealness cannot allow for logical probabilities to exist inside it because it's unreal, but once we isolate its surrounding concepts as the concepts of reasoning and consistency, this same unrealness becomes the basis behind why space can actually allow for other real forms of existences to exist within it.
If a concept does not have a perfect description of a cause and purpose, it will eventually cease to exist.
Space is made through combining reasoning and consistency as one to end up with an entirely new concept that's made from both. Concept isolation describes the process of creating a new concept through combining all its predecessor concepts and naming them all as one entirely new concept. At its core, concept isolation also sits as the process of identifying that a certain concept exists through describing it using its perfect descriptions, its cause and also its consequences as proof that the concept is real in the first place.
Consistency Moments
If eternity was to be measured through comparing it with the concept of the minus sign existing as a type of radius which moves from unrealness to become an actual consistency, this is how the realization of each moment as a type of consistency in time would grow.
1st moment - The center exists as a radius which doesn't have a circumference.
Negativity has always been. The concept of implicitness as the concept of reasoning, has begun to exist as the bottom of realness.
2nd moment - The circumference exists with a radius that's the size of lack. The center has become a realness. Concept isolation now also exists. Time has begun.
3rd moment - The circle now exists. A space has been added inside the circumference to sit as the concept of implicit realness(reasoning) and consistency(realness). Concept isolation now has a radius of two concepts, reasoning (center) and consistency(circumference).
4th moment - The disc has become real. Concept isolation has gained a radius of three consistencies which are the concepts of cause, realness and consequence. These three concepts also happen to be developmental concepts
which come from reasoning, consistency and space as a developmental concept.
Logical probabilities now exist. The concept of change has now extended the difference between unrealness and consistency further.
5th moment - The sphere has become real. The disc has a radius which can now point in three different directions in such a way that its consistencies sit as the concepts of reasoning, consistency and consequence becoming thought, reality and fulfilment.
Every reason forms as the radius of a specific consequence.
Understanding logic
Logic is the concept of perfectly ordered mathematics which also has the purpose measuring observable changes as consistencies and the different results they can create.
Where the number zero comes from.
- - - = 0 is an equation which observes the fact that space is made from both an inconsistency and a consistency at the same. A perfect balance of the minus (-) and plus(--) sign. This perfect balance of realness and negativity as an eternal allowance for further consistencies to exist and is also the reason why other consistencies otherwise known as numbers and decimals can actually become real.
The order of Mathematical concepts 1. Operands came before numbers because operands are a class concept that's derived from reasoning, as a form of change, becoming an observable movement.
2. Numbers exist as forms of consistencies in the different groups.
3. Decimals are the result of an idea of consistencies having further details inside them.
The lowest and highest numbers in existence Highest number: 10 to the power of infinity, depicts a 1 with an infinite amount of zeroes that keep adding themselves next to it. This concept is similar to the concept of consistency because it will forever keep growing in its detail and also remain as the highest form of realness possible.
Lowest number: 1/10 to the power of infinity, is a number which can be written down as zero comma infinite zeroes one. This number is similar to the concept of reasoning in the size of its growth because reasoning only grows once it starts to cover smaller details and will forever keep growing as those minute details start coming into realization.
The order behind the first 10 operands
1. - The minus sign sits as the concept of negativity or unrealness. At first, this concept begins as a state but once it turns into a form of reasoning, it can also sit as the bottom concept which allows for the concept of change to become an actual movement.
2. + The plus sign comes from two minus signs existing together as one to become a negation against negativity.
3. ÷ The division sign comes from the plus and minus sign existing together as the count(plus) of the reductions (minus) which can happen within a specific number.
4. × The multiplication sign comes from two plus signs existing together as one
in the form of an addition which has a further addition on top of it.
5. √ Roots come from the concept of division get ing a further division within itself which also allows those further divisions to sit as the base of the exponents that allow this divided number to equal the number under the root.
6. ^ Exponents come from two multiplication signs existing together as one to sit as the multiplication of numbers including the number of times that number can multiplied upon itself and its results.
7. ^√ Deeper roots come from the equal division between the bases with equal exponents that need to be multiplied together in order to re-create the number under the root. This will then result in the shrinking of that same base in such a way that if the square root of 81 is 9 because 9×9 is 81, then the deeper square root of 81 then becomes 3 because 3^2 × 3^2 is 81.
8. ^^ Deeper exponents come from two exponents existing together as one in such a way that the exponent gets a further exponent on top of the exponent that already exists.
9. ^^√ The 2nd depth root come from the equal division between the bases with equal exponents which also have further equal exponents above them. As an example, the 2nd depth square root of 6561 is 3 because 3^2^2× 3^2^2.
10. ^^^^ The 2nd depth exponent comes from two deeper exponents existing together as one. This is because if the first depth of exponents uses two exponent signs, the second depth must then use four exponent signs. This will also mean that the 3rd depth exponent must use eight exponent signs and so forth.
From the above order of operands, it can then be concluded that: 1. All negative or reduction operands come into existence before positive or incremental operands.
2. Except for the minus sign, all other negative operands are made from the previous negative and positive operands existing together to form a new operand.
3. All positive operands except for the plus sign, come from the previous positive operand iterating upon itself.
4. All operands, because of how they're always made from the expansion of their predecessor operands improving upon themselves, are infinite.
The order of operands as BERMDAS
Bodmas or bermdas?
Is 8 ÷ 4 × 4
2 × 4 = 8
or
8 ÷ 16 = 0,5?
BERMDAS
Brackets
Exponents
Roots
Multiplication
Divisions
Addition
Subtraction
If all operands were to be found within an equation, it would be required that we start applying their operations in the reverse order of their appearance order. To remember this operation sequence easier, the acronym BERMDAS can be used which comes from the first letters of the first six operands appearing in reverse order of which the first B, stands for brackets which sits as the isolation of an internal equation within an equation and because of that all numbers that are wrapped up within those same brackets, need to be worked out to become a single number before they can be applied to all other numbers within an equation which fall are outside of the brackets.
Subtraction
Example
9 – 7 = 2
This Means: If you are supposed to have 9 marbles but 7 of them are missing, you will only really 2 marbles left.
Addition
E.g. 9 + 7 = 16
This Means: To 9 marbles, if someone goes and adds 7 more marbles to the 9
that are already there, we will end up with a total of 16 marbles if we count them altogether.
Division
Example
9/7 or 9 ÷ 7 = 1, 28...
This Means: Count how many times you can take away 7 from 9 or fit 7 into 9.
If the remainder of this reduction is not 0, divide the denominator by 10 in order to make it smaller, and then count how many more times you can reduce the smaller denominator from that remainder until the remainder you end up with is zero.
Note: The numerator is always the number on the left side of a division sign or the top number of a fraction while the denominator is the number on the right side of a division sign or the bottom number of a fraction.
The first time we tried to subtract 7 from 9, we ended up with one successful reduction. This being the fact that 7 can only be taken away from 9 once and so we ended up with a remainder of 2. This then creates the first 1 in the 1,28
answer we ended up with...
Note: Within division, the first subtraction count is always as a whole number, and then it gets noted down as a tenth(1/10 or 0,1), a hundredth (1/100 or 0,01) and so forth.
After the first reduction , we then shrunk the 7 to 0,7 by dividing it by 10 and then managed to reduce it twice inside the remainder of 2. From there, the remainder became 0,6. This also gave us the 2 that we find as the second digit of the result of 1,28...
From there, we then divided 0,7 by 10 to end up with a denominator of 0,07 of which when we managed to subtract 0,07 from 0,6 eight times successfully, to end up with a remainder of 0,004. This then gave us the 8 that we find as the third digit result of 1,28...
Do note: The process of reducing the denominator would've continued until we ended up with a remainder of 0 but for the sake of the length of this example, we only stopped at the second decimal to save space and time.
Multiplication
Example
9 × 7 = 63
This Means: If we add seven 9’s together, we wil end up with a result of of 63.
This also means that if we add nine 7's together we will also end up with an answer of 63.
Example
(1)9 (2)+9 [18] (3) +9 [27] (4) +9 [36](5) +9 [45] (6) +9 [54] (7)+9 [63]
or
(1)7 (2)+7 [14] (3) +7 [21] (4) +7 [28](5) +7 [35] (6) +7 [42] (7) +7 [49] (8) +7
[56] (9) +7 [63]
Roots
The best way to describe roots is through examples. These examples are based on the idea that a square root gives a higher result than a cube root and a 4th root will give a lesser result than a cube root which means the lower the root, the bigger the result you get from it, and the higher the root, the smaller the result you get as its result. Roots can also be considered as the opposite of exponents just as every reduction operand is the exact opposite of the incremental operand that comes after it. Based on the above explanation, the following examples are given:
Example 1
The 0eth √(root) of 81 = 0.
In other words: Is there a non-existence that we can multiply in order to create the number 81? The answer is 0 because no such number exists.
The 1st √(root) of 81 = 81
In other words: Which single number can I use to create the number 81? The answer is 81.
The 2nd √(root) of 81 = 9
In other words: Which 2 numbers that have the same value, can I multiply together to create the number 81? The answer is 9 because 9×9=81
The 3rd √(root) of 81 = 4, 32…
In other words: which 3 numbers that have the same value, can I multiply together to create the number 81? The answer is 4,32… because 4,32. × 4,32. .
×4,32... = 81
The 0eth √ of 1000 = 0
In other words: Is there a non-existence that we can multiply to create the number 1000? The answer is 0 because there is no such.
The 1st √ of 1000 = 1000
In other words: Which single number can I use by itself to create the number 1000? The answer is 1000.
The 2nd √ of 1000 = 31,62…
In other words: Which 2 numbers that have the same value, can we multiply together to create the number 1000? The answer is 31,62… because 31,62. . ×
31,62... = 1000.
The 3rd √ of 1000 = 10
In other words: Which 3 numbers that have the same value, can we multiply together to end up with a result of 1000? The answer is 10 because 10×10×10 =