Deep Analytics: Technologies for Humanity, AI & Security by Sumit Chakraborty, Suryashis Chakraborty, Kusumita - HTML preview

FURTHER READING

• P. Attewell. 1992. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: the case of business computing, Organ. Sci., 3(1).
• Basalla, G. 1988. The Evolution of Technology, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• E.M. Rogers. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed., Free Press, New York.
• M.W. Cardullo.1996. Introduction to Managing Technology, Vol. 4, J. A. Brandon, ed., Engineering Management Series, Research Studies Press, Taunton, England.
• D.I. Cleland and W.R. King. 1983. Systems Analysis and Project Management, McGraw-Hill, New York.
• N.W. Hatch and D.C.Mowery. 1996. Process Innovation and Learning by Doing in Semiconductor Manufacturing. Research policy, 25, 1097-1119.
• G. P. Pisano. 1996. Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology. USA .
• W.B.Hirschmann. 1964. Profit from the learning curve. Harvard Business Review. 42(1)125-139,
• M. Kilbridge, M. 1962. A model for industrial learning. Management Sci. 8.
• G.P. Pisano. 1997. The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
• M.E.Porter. 1980. Competitive Strategy. Free Press, New York.
• J.D.Teece, G, Pisano and A. Shuen. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management . 18(7) 509-533.
• P.Adler and K. Clark. 1991. Behind the learning curve. Management Science 37(3), 267-281.
• K.Ulrich and S. Eppinger. 1995. Product Design and Development. McGraw- Hill, New York.
• E.Hippel and M. Tyre. 1995, How the 'learning by doing' is done: problem identification in novel process equipment. Research Policy 24(1), 1-12.
• Richard C. Dorf (Ed.).2000. Technology Management Handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
• R. Adner. 2006. Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review. April.
• R. Adner. 2002. When are technologies disruptive: a demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management Journal 23(8): 667– 688.
• R. Adner and D. Levinthal D. 2001. Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: implication for product and process innovation. Management Science 47(5):611–628.
• R. Adner and P.Zemsky. 2002. Strategy dynamics through a demand-based lens: the evolution of market boundaries, resource rents, and competitive positions. INSEAD working paper series 2003/01/SM.
• R.Adner and P.Zemsky. 2005. Disruptive technology and the emergence of competition. Rand Journal of Economics 36(2): 229–254.
• J.M.Utterback and W. Abernathy. 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656.
• B. Wernerfelt. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171–180.
• M.A.Schilling. 2017. Strategic management of technological innovation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• M.A.Schilling. 2015. Towards dynamic efficiency: Innovation and its implications for antitrust Antitrust Bulletin.
• M. A. Schilling and C. E. Vasco. Product and Process Technological Change and the Adoption of Modular Organizational Forms. in Winning Strategies in a Deconstructing World, eds. R. Bresser,M. Hitt, R. Nixon, and D. Heuskel (Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, 2000), pp. 25–50.
• H. A. Simon. 1973. Technology and Environment. Management Science 19 (1973), pp. 1110–21.
• H. Chesbrough. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard University Press, Boston.
• M.A.Schilling and C.Phelps. 2007. Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The impact of Large-scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation. Management Science 53, pp. 1113–1126.
• M. Boden. 1992. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. New York: Basic Books, 1992.
• R. J. Thomas. 1995. New Product Success Stories: Lessons from Leading Innovators , John Wiley & Sons, NY.
• E. Roberts. 2001. Benchmarking Global Strategic Management of Technology. Research Technology Management, March–April, pp. 25–36.
• M. Dodgson. 2000. The Management of Technological Innovation. Oxford University Press, NY.
• A.B. Jaffe. 1986. Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value. American Economic Review 76, pp. 984–1001.
• J. Sterman. 1983. Economic vulnerability and the energy transition, Energy Systems and Policy 7(4), 259-301.
• J.Sterman and J. Wittenberg. 1989. Path dependence, competition, and succession in the Stewart, I., Does God Play Dice? The Mathematics of Chaos. Cambridge, MA: dynamics of scientific revolution, Organization Science 10(3), 322-341
• J.W.Forrester. 1985. The model versus a modeling process, System Dynamics Review 1(1), 133-134.
• J.W. Forrester. 1968. Principles of systems. MIT Press, Cambridge.
• D. Kim and P. Senge. 1994. Putting systems thinking into practice, System Dynamics Review lO(2-3), 277-290.
• P. Senge. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York Doubleday.
• P. Senge and J. Sterman. 1992. Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future, European Journal of Operational Research 59(1), 137-150. (eds.) (1994) Modeling for Learning Organizations. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
• P.K.J. Mohapatra and P. Mandal. 1989. System dynamics paradigm, Decision, 16(no. 4):251-266.
• A. E. Plaza. 1994. Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations and system approaches, AI Communication. 7 (1), March, 39–59.
• D.B. Leake (Ed.). 1996. Case-Based Reasoning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
• T.W.Malone, R.Laubacher and C.Dellarocas. 2010. The Collective Intelligence Genome. MIT Sloan Management Review. Spring, volume 51, no. 3.
• S.L.Epstein. 2015. Wanted : Collaborative Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 221, 2015, 36 - 45.
• Averbakh. 2010. Nash equilibria in competitive project scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research 205, 552–556.
• W.Herroelen and R.Leus. 2005. Project scheduling under uncertainty: survey and research potentials. European Journal of Operational Research, 165, 289–306.
• A.J.Shenhar. 2001. One size does not fit all projects : exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science. Vol. 47 no. 3, pp. 394 - 414. March.
• H.Kerzner and C. Belack.2010. Managing Complex Projects, John Wiley & Sons and the International Institute for Learning (IIL) Co-publishers.
• H.Kerzner, 2006. Project Management Best Practices; Achieving Global Excellence, Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons Publishers.
• J.W.Ross and C.M.Beath. 2002. Beyond the business case: new approaches to IT investment. MIT Sloan Management Review. Winter.
• R.H.Waterman, T.J.Peters and J.R. Phillips. 1980. Structure is not organization. Business Horizons. June.
• S. Chakraborty and S.K. Sharma. 2007. Enterprise Resource Planning: An Integrated Strategic Framework. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Volume 4, No. 5.
• B.E. Becker and M.A. Huselid. 2006. Strategic human resource management: Where do we go from here? Journal of Management 32(6), 898–925 (2006).
• A. Mishra and I. Akman, 2010. nformation Technology in Human Resource Management: An Empirical Assessment. Public: Personnel Management 39(3), 271–290.
• N.Kashive. 2011, N.: Managing Today’s Workforce: Human Resource Information System (HRIS), Its challenge and Opportunities. International Journal of Research in Finance & Marketing 1(6), 38–66.
• T.S.Teo, G.S. Lim and S.A.Fedric. 2007. The adoption and diffusion of human resources information systems in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 45(1), 44–61.
• M,.G. Martinsons. 1994. Benchmarking human resource information systems in Canada and and Hong Kong. Information and Management 26(6), 305– 316.
• Sachs, J.,  Schmidt-Traub,  G.,  Kroll,  C.,  Lafortune,  G.,  Fuller,  G.  (2019): Sustainable Development Report 2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN)
• dpicampaigns. "About the Sustainable Development Goals". United Nations Sustainable Development.
• "United Nations Official Document". www.un.org.
• "Transforming our world: the 2030  Agenda  for  Sustainable Development". United Nations – Sustainable Development knowledge platform. UN2030 agenda (adopted at UN Summit in New York on 25-27 September 2015) by 2030 as per UN Resolution 70/1, 2030 agenda.
• "Global Goals | Policy and advocacy". Sightsavers. 25 September 2017.
• "17Goals – The SDG Tracker: Charts, graphs and data at your fingertips". Retrieved 10 March 2019.
• "The History of Sustainable Development in the United Nations". Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development. UN. 20–22 June 2012.
• Development, World Commission on Environment and. "Our Common Future, Session 2: Towards Sustainable Development - A/42/427 Annex, Session  2  -  UN   Documents:   Gathering   a   body   of   global agreements". www.un-documents.net. 2017.
• "World leaders adopt Sustainable Development Goals". United Nations Development Programme.
• "Extreme poverty is falling: How is poverty changing for higher poverty lines?". Our World in Data.
• Ortiz-Ospina, Esteban; Roser, Max (25 May 2013). "Global Extreme Poverty". Our World in Data.
• Fan, Shenggen and Polman, Paul. 2014. An ambitious development goal: Ending hunger and undernutrition by 2025. In 2013 Global food policy report. Eds. Marble, Andrew and Fritschel, Heidi. Session 2. Pp 15-28. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
• WHO and UNICEF (2017) Progress on Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: 2017 Update and SDG Baselines. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2017.
• Staples, D., & Hermes, R. (2012). Marine biodiversity and resource management – what is the link? Aquatic  Ecosystem  Health  &  Management, 15(3), 245–252. doi:10.1080/14634988.2012.709429
• Vierros, M. (2017). Global Marine Governance and Oceans Management for the Achievement of SDG 14. UN Chronicle, 54(1/2), 1.
• Metcalfe, K., Collins, T., Abernethy, K. E., Boumba, R., Dengui, J., Miyalou, R., … Godley, B. J. (2017). Addressing Uncertainty in Marine Resource Management; Combining Community Engagement and Tracking Technology to Characterize Human Behavior. Conservation Letters, 10(4), 459–469. doi:10.1111/conl.12293.
• van Putten, I. E., Plagányi, É. E., Booth, K., Cvitanovic, C., Kelly, R., Punt, A. E., & Richards, S. A. (2018). A framework for incorporating sense of place into the management  of  marine  systems. Ecology  &  Society, 23(4),  42–  65. doi:10.5751/ES-10504-230404
• Hughes, Z. D., Fenichel, E. P., & Gerber, L. R. (2011). The Potential Impact of Labor Choices on the Efficacy of Marine Conservation Strategies. PLoS ONE, 6(8), 1–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023722
• Finkl, C. W., & Makowski, C. (2010). Increasing sustainability of coastal management by merging monitored marine environments with inventoried shelf resources. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 67(6), 861– 870. doi:10.1080/00207230902916786
• Bhargava, A. (2019). "Climate change, demographic pressures and global sustainability", Economics and Human Biology, 33, 149–154.
• Firzli, Nicolas. "Smart Capital and Sustainable Finance in the Sino- American Century", 16 December 2019, Private Debt Investor.
• Lietaer, Bernard (2019). "Towards a sustainable world - 3 paradigms to achieve", available as of Oct.31, 2019 ISBN 978-3-200-06527-7. Discusses "the law of sustainability" presented with Robert E.Ulanowicz and Sally J.Goerner.
• Wilson, Clive (2018). "Designing the Purposeful World - the Sustainable Development Goals as a blueprint for humanity" Routledge.