The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg and Other Stories HTML version
Diplomatic Pay And Clothes
VIENNA, January 5--I find in this morning's papers the statement that the Government of
the United States has paid to the two members of the Peace Commission entitled to
receive money for their services 100,000 dollars each for their six weeks' work in Paris.
I hope that this is true. I will allow myself the satisfaction of considering that it is true,
and of treating it as a thing finished and settled.
It is a precedent; and ought to be a welcome one to our country. A precedent always has a
chance to be valuable (as well as the other way); and its best chance to be valuable (or the
other way) is when it takes such a striking form as to fix a whole nation's attention upon
it. If it come justified out of the discussion which will follow, it will find a career ready
and waiting for it.
We realise that the edifice of public justice is built of precedents, from the ground
upward; but we do not always realise that all the other details of our civilisation are
likewise built of precedents. The changes also which they undergo are due to the
intrusion of new precedents, which hold their ground against opposition, and keep their
place. A precedent may die at birth, or it may live--it is mainly a matter of luck. If it be
imitated once, it has a chance; if twice a better chance; if three times it is reaching a point
where account must be taken of it; if four, five, or six times, it has probably come to stay-
-for a whole century, possibly. If a town start a new bow, or a new dance, or a new
temperance project, or a new kind of hat, and can get the precedent adopted in the next
town, the career of that precedent is begun; and it will be unsafe to bet as to where the
end of its journey is going to be. It may not get this start at all, and may have no career;
but, if a crown prince introduce the precedent, it will attract vast attention, and its chances
for a career are so great as to amount almost to a certainty.
For a long time we have been reaping damage from a couple of disastrous precedents.
One is the precedent of shabby pay to public servants standing for the power and dignity
of the Republic in foreign lands; the other is a precedent condemning them to exhibit
themselves officially in clothes which are not only without grace or dignity, but are a
pretty loud and pious rebuke to the vain and frivolous costumes worn by the other
officials. To our day an American ambassador's official costume remains under the
reproach of these defects. At a public function in a European court all foreign
representatives except ours wear clothes which in some way distinguish them from the
unofficial throng, and mark them as standing for their countries. But our representative
appears in a plain black swallow-tail, which stands for neither country, nor people. It has
no nationality. It is found in all countries; it is as international as a night-shirt. It has no
particular meaning; but our Government tries to give it one; it tries to make it stand for
Republican Simplicity, modesty and unpretentiousness. Tries, and without doubt fails, for
it is not conceivable that this loud ostentation of simplicity deceives any one. The statue
that advertises its modesty with a fig-leaf really brings its modesty under suspicion. Worn
officially, our nonconforming swallow-tail is a declaration of ungracious independence in