Linear Controller Design: Limits of Performance by Stephen Boyd and Craig Barratt - HTML preview

PLEASE NOTE: This is an HTML preview only and some elements such as links or page numbers may be incorrect.
Download the book in PDF, ePub, Kindle for a complete version.

CHAPTER 7 REALIZABILITY AND CLOSED-LOOP STABILITY

as shown in gure 7.9. so that the closed-loop transfer matrix is

Q

= 1 + 2 3

H

U

U

QU

:

Thus the set of closed-loop transfer matrices achievable by the modi ed controller

shown in gure 7.9 is

mcp = zw + zu

yw

stable

H

fP

P

QP

j

Q

g

:

The expression here for mcp is the same as the expression for stable in equa-

H

H

tion (7.21) in section 7.2.4. So in this case the modi ed controller paradigm gener-

ates all stabilizing controllers: any stabilizing controller for a stable plant can

K

P

be implemented with a suitable stable as shown in gure 7.9.

Q

The reader can also verify that the connection of with the augmented nominal

Q

controller yields = ( + yu) 1 |exactly the same formula as (7.22) with

;

K

I

QP

Q

Q

substituted for .

R

7.4

A State-Space Parametrization

A general method of applying the modi ed controller paradigm starts with a nom-

inal controller that is an estimated-state feedback. The estimated-state-feedback

controller is given by

=

sfb^

(7.28)

u

;K

x

where sfb is some appropriate matrix (the state-feedback gain) and ^ is an estimate

K

x

of the component of due to , governed by the observer equation

x

u

_^ = P ^ + u + est(

y^)

(7.29)

x

A

x

B

u

L

y

;

C

x

where est is some appropriate matrix (the estimator gain). The transfer matrix of

L

this controller is thus

nom( ) =

sfb(

P + u sfb + est y) 1

;

est

K

s

;K

sI

;

A

B

K

L

C

L

:

nom will stabilize

provided sfb and est are chosen such that P

u sfb

K

P

K

L

A

;

B

K

and P

est y are stable, which we assume in the sequel.

A

;

L

C

To augment this estimated-state-feedback nominal controller, we inject into

v

, before the observer tap, meaning that (7.28) is replaced by

u

=

sfb^ +

(7.30)

u

;K

x

v

and therefore the signal does not induce any observer error. For the signal we

v

e

take the output prediction error:

=

y^

(7.31)

e

y

;

C

x :

index-172_1.png

index-172_2.png

index-172_3.png

index-172_4.png

7.4 A STATE-SPACE PARAMETRIZATION

163

D

y

w

+

+

q

q

r

w

z

D

z

w

+

r

+

D

z

u

x

B

C

w

z

(

) 1

;

sI

;

A

P

+

q

r

y

u

C

B

y

u

+

P

nom

K

+

q

^

r

C

B

y

x

u

(

) 1

;

;

sI

;

A

P

est

L

sfb

K

;

r

+

q

v

e

Q

+

x

Q

C

Q

(

) 1

;

r

+

q

B

sI

;

A

Q

Q

D

Q

The modied controller paradigm as applied to a nominal

Figure

7.10

estimated-state-feedback controller nom. is added to the actuator signal

K

v

before the observer tap, and is the output prediction error. With the

u

e

stable realization added, the modied controller is called an observer-

Q

based controller.

index-173_1.png

index-173_2.png

index-173_3.png

index-173_4.png

164

Find Your Next Great Read

Describe what you're looking for in as much detail as you'd like.
Our AI reads your request and finds the best matching books for you.

Showing results for ""

Popular searches:

Romance Mystery & Thriller Self-Help Sci-Fi Business