58 THE THIRD WORLD WAR
Throughout history, human beings have always been involved in conflicts, and periods of peace have been used to regain strength and continue wars, which shows that man's predisposition to war has always been constant, but Today, that is different, because the existence of nuclear weapons does not allow the great super powers to confront each other directly because of the risk they have of being completely destroyed. That means that the greed of the population combined with the greed of politicians could unleash a great tribulation or social confusion like the one cited in the biblical apocalypse which, in turn, could provoke a global civil confrontation assuming that society does not find another means to express their aggressiveness. In other words, the inability of society to turn its aggressiveness into a war could accumulate until leading to a civil conflict.
This anxiety for violence is similar to the effect that drug addiction produces on the brain, but if that desire for violence does not find a way out through a military conflict, then it could cause even family members or neighbors to confront each other until culminating in a civil conflict of a planetary nature. However, it must also be said that this exacerbated aggressiveness is more the consequence of vanity and selfishness than of a normal psychological situation, but when it is concentrated in the organs of power the risk is greater, because in the wars that have existed Throughout history, not only injustice has been present, but above all selfishness, tyranny or arrogance as amplifying elements of that injustice that, to a greater or lesser extent, most people have. In reality, evil is present equally in all social layers regardless of their economic level, but power makes it easier for that evil that already existed to go abroad.
Because the great superpowers are always getting involved in smaller conflicts, a global civil conflict may never occur, but it is clear that the risk will only cease to exist when society changes its attitude and rejects violence or violence war as a means to achieve their objectives. An example of this social aggressiveness is found in the fact that many citizens tend to support their military when they invade countries even when they commit crimes against humanity, because in these cases both the government and the media often provide an appropriate alibi so that the masses can support this military intervention without feeling remorse of conscience. In other words, the most important thing for them is not whether this military intervention is legitimate or not, but rather that they are provided with an adequate pretext to be able to support it without anyone being able to call them militarists, which is why politicians always make sure that they are surrounded by means of communication related to your program. The truth is that society is usually quite inclined to forget the crimes against humanity committed by its soldiers abroad when those crimes are associated with the word victory, but at the same time they remember all those crimes when it comes to the losing army, especially when that army is from another country.
At present, the human being continues to foment hatred and greed against his fellow men because he does not want to renounce materialism. This contained aggressiveness ends up becoming an incitement to violence and those who hold power or try to achieve it use tricks and mental manipulation of citizens to try to achieve their objectives, this causes the difference between reality and reality lie of what we see is growing. This psychological phenomenon is not being caused only by politicians, but also by citizens to the extent that they are dominated by evil.
It is possible that the consequence of this contained aggressiveness that does not manage to go abroad is the beginning of a world civil war but, if it does occur, it will surely not be a confrontation between nations, but rather a confrontation between the citizens of the nations more developed nations, because it is these nations that control the political and mental changes in the world, that is, it is the most powerful nations that decide what is politically correct for the rest of the world to believe. The conflict could begin when a confrontation of small intensity between the great nations revealed the weakness and decomposition of one of them, that feeling of failure, would cause some citizens to blame others for what happened and as a consequence it would be triggered a civil confrontation. Then, the truth that had been hidden all the time would be revealed, and that is that many of those who called themselves "democrats" only moved out of greed, but this was not easily seen because power always makes up the tyranny. When things go well it is easy for everyone to say they are very decent or very democratic, but when things go wrong is when you discover who they really are.
It often happens that, when a society is corrupted or weakened, the government tries to look for a scapegoat abroad to blame for all social problems in order to channel the aggressiveness of the people against it, that is, it tries to look for an innocent country to attack so that people can unite by having a common victim whom everyone can blame for their personal problems and thus channel their aggressiveness against her without damaging their political or social system. This explains why great powers always try to be at war with someone. This, in reality, is a form of harassment or mistreatment, but exercised by the whole society. Before the aggression occurs, there is a preliminary phase, in which the government publishes false news or half-truths to blame everything on that country, so that people support the aggression with the minimum of remorse of conscience.
However, when that attempt to attack another country fails as a result of its own social degeneration, then the feeling of frustration increases the discomfort of a society dominated by evil that sees its desire to harm others frustrated, this determines that the confrontation between them is inevitable. This is very normal to occur among countries that have gone through a period of great political and economic prosperity, but when that period of success is not properly managed and is used to corrupt and waste economic resources, then the society dominated by vanity It ends up destroying the foundations that made them great, this generates greater social unrest that, if not channeled in the form of aggression to another country, can degenerate into civil war.
The conflict would start in a single country, and then spread to the others, meanwhile, the less developed nations would just wait to see the result. If this conflict were to occur, I do not think it will be too bloody, but it would show that many things that people consider unquestionable truths are nothing more than crude prejudices, but that they continue to be maintained because many are interested in people continuing to believe in them so that their privileged situation does not change. It is possible that the assault on the capitol that occurred in the United States in January 2021, is one of the symptoms of that social tension that does not find the way to go abroad. Badly managed success can also lead to social degeneration as happened to Rome two thousand years earlier. It is sad that being an excellent republic at the beginning, however, it ended up becoming one of the most vulgar dictatorships in the end.
At present, and especially in Western countries, we live in a time of anarchy and social degeneration in which doctors, policemen, or teachers are no longer respected, because they are constantly being attacked, and power worries more for the interests of murderers than for the rights of decent people. In any case, it is impossible to know for sure whether a global civil conflict will occur or not, but it would be desirable for the good of humanity that both governments and citizens put dignity and ethics above mere interest material as it happens right now. It is evident that the world will not have overcome its current level of social confusion until it accepts to give spirituality the same value that it gives to the material, because that is the subject that remains to complete its development.
The attitude of politicians is increasingly similar to that of the Catholic Church, because in order to maintain their privileges they try to convince citizens that reality is the opposite of what it is. This already happened in the past when the church persecuted astronomers to burn them alive for saying that the sun was the center of the solar system. This is because many politicians have achieved their power by supporting wrong postulates, but nevertheless, people believe, that is why they try by all means to keep them believing in the old myths even though there is more and more evidence that point against. This attitude creates a growing difference between collective or politically correct beliefs and reality. This truth tries to go abroad because it is not possible to fool people indefinitely, it is possible to fool a few for a long time, it is also possible to fool many for a short time, but it is not possible to fool everyone for all the time. Citizens have a lot to blame for this social confusion, because they are lazy and do not like to meditate, they do not understand that the truth does not come alone and it is necessary to take time to find it, but since they have little free time and do not like to meditate they limit themselves to assume the politically correct truths even if they are full of lies. This, politicians know very well that is why they stimulate their aggressiveness against opposing political groups with the intention that they act against them without thinking and without realizing that their greatest enemy is the one who incites them to hatred.
It is also outrageous that the Catholic Church intends to distribute sanctities like a baker distributes bread, because putting the qualifier "saint" before the proper name is an act of arrogance intended only to advertise itself, because holiness is a quality that if you have better, but no religious organization has the right to use that qualifier as if it were a proper name for the simple reason that the sanctity of a person is something that should be subject to the opinion of each citizen and not something that can be use as equivalent of the name. Trying to make people believe that they have the right to decide who is holy or who is just is an act of supreme frivolity, considering the immense number of crimes against humanity that the Catholic Church has committed throughout its history history.
This difference between the truth that tries to go abroad and the politically correct truth that is offered to the masses is one of the main factors that favors social conflict. It is as if those who profit from these false myths will try by all means to keep citizens asleep or hypnotized by trying to control the media so that people continue to believe in the outdated myths of the past. This difference between the truth and the belief that the masses consider the truth is also a consequence of ignorance, because when society is unable to correctly understand the world around it, then it tries to invent an imaginary world that serves as an intermediary between the truth and what they are capable of understanding. This situation causes increasing anxiety when citizens understand that what they are told to be true and to believe does not match what they see.
But the evil is not only in those who govern, because a country can only be governed by scoundrels when the moral level of those who vote for them is so low as not to see that they are scoundrels. In reality, politicians are as ignorant of the great universal truths as the rest of the citizens, that is why it is false that they know everything about everything as the instigators of mistrust and sectarians claim. That game that some make of saying that all the evil is in the government and all the good is in civil society is a way of deceiving themselves, they act like that, because they don't want to see the scoundrel in the mirror. Because only a stupid would think that the world is divided between bad politicians and good citizens, goodness and evil exist in all social spheres even if it is true that selfish people have an inordinate interest in reaching the highest paid positions. For this reason, it is necessary for people to abandon the exclusively materialistic attitude that prevails at this time to usher in a new era in which the great metaphysical truths are finally resolved and accepted by all areas of society.
The Second World War was provoked by a totalitarian and centralist regime that provoked so much fear that Western countries have totally leaned towards a libertine social model to counteract it. But living in a dictatorship can be just as bad as living in anarchy, centralist and centrifugal politics can be as bad, an exclusively masculine and feminine world can be so bad, extremist capitalism can be as bad as the communism that now spreads by the West with the name of feminism or miscegenation. When society spends a lot of time at one extreme, it causes the opposite to turn. Now, in western countries freedom is confused with debauchery and politicians allow all kinds of disorders while only worrying about getting rich. If society does not remedy this situation and seek balance, it could end up causing the return of another extremist regime.
At this moment, the world has overcome the consequences of the Second World War for so long that there is almost no one left who has witnessed it, that is why there are more and more people full of aggressiveness and greed who try to hide their selfishness behind of supposed reasons to justify the violence, but, with this behavior, they can end up provoking another world conflict. These people seem to ignore how bad wars can be and naively believe that if it occurs to them it will not harm them. The downside is that when war comes and they see the dramatic consequences it has, they understand that it is not what they thought but, at that moment, it is too late to avoid it.
One of the main problems of contemporary society is the lack of culture, because when an important problem is posed to a society full of ignorant people who consider culture a thing of "strange types" referring to intelligent people, in the end it is impossible to do nothing until it's too late. Because a cultured person understands when it is necessary to act firmly, but an ignorant person doubts everything because he is not able to differentiate the truth from the lie, therefore, when it is necessary to make an important decision that harms the scammers, they always choose for scaring the crowd by saying what is going to cause them the most fear into acting impulsively and opposing any change in the situation. That is to say that the scammers try by all means that people do not think and act only out of prejudice, but saying that it is to fight against prejudice. This happens, because due to insecurity a world of ignorant only accepts to change the simple things normally, but the important things that involve sacrifices are only changed when it is too late to avoid further damage, and when that happens, then the scammers they always say that no one could predict what was going to happen. Therefore, the best antidote to manipulation is to appreciate culture and analyze things in detail, because the truth is not the exclusive property of anyone and all ideologies usually have some reason, therefore, we must analyze things calmly before make a final decision. Similarly, we shouldn't be afraid to be energetic when a problem calls for it either, because applying simple remedies to serious problems is just a way of doing nothing.
In the intellectual aspect, the world is made up of two parts, one is what we know and another is what we ignore. At the beginning of history almost all knowledge was unknown to humanity. At present, it is possibly balanced between what is known and what is unknown. This means that the good management of a government can influence to make an empire grow, but it also helps that the part of reality that we do not know works in its favor. In the same way it happens the other way around, because when an empire begins to crumble, many times it is its own degeneration that causes it to fall, but it also helps to ignore a part of reality that is working against it without knowing it, in fact. , moral degeneration is the consequence of ignoring the consequences of letting yourself be dominated by vanity. That means that an empire can be great but, nevertheless, be working without knowing it in its own destruction, because if it makes wrong decisions it harms itself, and if to that, mismanagement derived from arrogance is added, then the speed of its fall can be much greater.
An example of mismanagement is some public companies, because there is nothing wrong with these types of companies, but economic competitiveness is good for the progress of a country. The difference between what is public and what is private is that in a private company the director strives to avoid unnecessary expenses and punishes vagrancy, but, on the other hand, public money is usually wasted, because undue spending is not passed on to the company salary of those who waste it but in the budget of the state or of the municipalities. This occurs because there are officials who act as if that money belonged to no one, and to make things worse, their bosses often support them because they act in a similar way or to avoid discussions, in addition, they know that any mistake will be paid for by the public budget. . Then, governments tend to support such waste or mismanagement for fear that officials will turn their backs on them and paralyze the system through strikes. There are also many governments that, in order to be reelected, are indebting their country beyond their ability to repay the loan and without telling the citizens that they will then have to pay back that money. It is as if they used the loan to buy the votes.
The remedy for both governments and people is to act with humility and reject vanity in the projects that are made in life, because vanity clouds the mind and leads those who allow themselves to be dominated by it astray. It is also necessary to give importance to meditation and calm analysis of things, because in this way the risk of making mistakes decreases. When things go well everyone seems wonderful because when there is abundance it is easy to pretend what one is not, but when things go wrong then the false decorations fall and reality prevails, for that reason, when empires crumble, those Values that seemed to be immovable disappear because in reality they were only decorations created to take advantage of the good run. This shows how the human being abuses the lie and uses words to say that he defends the opposite of what is thought, and there are many rich and poor people who while publicly defend the good or democracy, however in their Inside are dictators in disguise who only appear decent to achieve their goals. This situation is gradually making the world we know more and more like a set that many are striving to maintain. The fact that lies occupy a more prominent place every day in the part that we consider to be true increases the risk of a global civil conflict. Hopefully society rectifies and returns to morals and humility before that can happen.
When humanity abandons materialism and recognizes the eternal life of matter and spirit, a mental change will take place so important that it will be as if on a rainy day the clouds part to make the blue sky clear. At that moment the world will have crossed the border between backwardness and the future, then justice will become the axis of moral conduct and wars will end forever.