Characteristics of
Knowledge Management
Process Reengineering
Documenting “What Is”
Defining “What Should Be”
Collaboration
Benchmarking
Communities of practice
Best practices
Knowledge audits
Business model change
Knowledge mapping
Downsizing
Mentoring
Eliminating non–value added
Social network analysis
steps
Stor ytelling
Training and development
mally involves the participation of employees who normally would not work together in the course of their regular work.
• Communities of practice. Employees who share tasks, projects, interests, and goals, normally within a specific work area. For example, the programmers and artists in Medical Multimedia formed two communities of practice, defined largely by their common work function. Communities of practice are generally self-forming, dynamic entities.
• Knowledge mapping. A process of identifying who knows what, how the information is stored in the organization, where it’s stored, and how the stores of information are interrelated.
• Mentoring. Experts sharing heuristics, values, and techniques with employees new to processes within the company.
Mentoring, like the formation of communities of practice, can be fostered by the corporation but not dictated.
• Social network analysis. The process of identifying who interacts with whom and how information is communicated from one individual or group to another.
49
E S S E N T I A L S o f K n o w l e d g e M a n a g e m e n t T I P S & T E C H N I Q U E S
Storytelling: The Larry Chair
Storytelling is a highly efficient form of information sharing because it communicates data, contextual rules, and subtleties of behavior that may be difficult to state explicitly. For example, instead of simply having a rule for the hostess of a restaurant to “seat obese people in the special chairs,” employees of the Olive Tree restaurant chain are introduced to proper rules and etiquette through the story of the Larry chair. As the story goes, some time ago Larry, a rather rotund patron of one of the restaurants, complained to management that the chairs, all of which had arms, were too confining. As a result of the complaint, senior management decided that every restaurant in the chain would be equipped with at least two chairs without armrests to accommodate heavier patrons. When girth-challenged patrons enter one of the Olive Tree restaurants, they are discreetly directed to a table with one or more of the special chairs—affectionately referred to as the “Larry chairs.”
By relating the story to new employees, management creates a memorable set of expectations. The wait staff understands the purpose of the chairs as well as the need for discretion and the importance of proactively doing whatever it takes to make patrons feel like valued guests.
• Storytelling. Otherwise known as the case-based method of teaching, storytelling is a way of communicating corporate values and other implicit forms of knowledge.
• Training and development. The traditional method of dispers-ing explicit knowledge. However, in Knowledge
Management, training and development normally involves internal experts from different disciplines, as opposed to professional trainers.
50
K n o w l e d g e O r g a n i z a t i o n s
It’s important to note that these activities aren’t limited to KM initiatives, and rarely are all techniques used in the same initiative and at the same time.
Knowledge Management and Business Models
The viability of a KM program varies as a function of the work performed by the company, how risk is managed, the personality and management philosophy of the CEO, and the underlying business model. Normally, management’s philosophy and the business model are in sync, either because a particular form of management is recruited to fit a particular model or because the CEO defined a business model that conformed to his or her vision. For example, CEOs who manage by control or coordination are more likely to devise a centralized business model than are CEOs whose management philosophy is based more on allocating resources or energizing employees.
Exhibit 2.6 lists the applicability of Knowledge Management to common business models.
Some business models lend themselves to Knowledge Management more than others. For example, in Mary’s experience with Medical Multimedia, the centralized business model with strong, centralized leadership facilitates the implementation of KM practices in the company.
In the centralized business model, there is a high degree of corporate-level control because revenue, reporting, and employee reward are fun-neled through the corporate management.With a centralized approach, clear lines of communication can result, enabling economies of scale and the ability to standardize the use of knowledge management technologies throughout the organization. Management can send a clear, unambiguous message to employees that investing time and personal resources in the corporate-wide KM effort will be rewarded when it’s time for annual reviews and bonuses. However, management doesn’t 51
E S S E N T I A L S o f K n o w l e d g e M a n a g e m e n t E X H I B I T 2 . 6
Business Model
Applicability of Knowledge Management
Centralized
Strongly applicable when centralized leader-
ship rewards employees for KM behaviors
Decentralized
Weak, because a weak central locus of infor-
mation control makes it difficult to reward
sharing of information between disparate
groups
Outsourced
Weak, except for knowledge in working with
and managing outside vendors
Insourced
Strong for an existing KM program, but weak
for a new initiative because of the volatility of employee responsibility and the temporar y
nature of the work assignments
Cosourced
Variable, depending on the mix of insourced
and outsourced activities and the timing of
the inception of cosourcing relative to the
star t of the KM initiative
Shared services
Variable, depending on the maturity of the
shared business unit
necessarily have to buy in to the concept of Knowledge Management.
If senior management is divided over fully backing a KM initiative, including the sharing of information, then the initiative is likely to fail.
If the Medical Multimedia had been based on a decentralized model in which information is controlled largely by department leadership, Mary would likely have failed at implementing a KM program. In the decentralized business model, there is no central locus of information control, and the local department or company division typically handles reporting and reward for employee performance. The decentralized model provides flexibility at the cost of redundancy throughout the organization and poor integration.
52
K n o w l e d g e O r g a n i z a t i o n s
When work is outsourced, there is a loss of control from a process perspective, in exchange for short-term price savings. Business functions are delegated to an outside vendor that serves a number of other clients.
Outsourcing usually is done to save costs (including avoiding hiring full-time employees for short-term projects) and done when the job requires a high skill level and is one with a low volume of demand. The downside of outsourcing is the relative lack of control over the vendor’s product or services. External vendors can’t be expected to reveal their internal processes or trade secrets. However, since the vendor must deliver whatever is specified in its contract, the contracting company has leverage in acquiring certain data.
Insourcing, a strategy in which underused internal resources are redirected, can take advantage of an ongoing KM program but is incompatible with a new KM initiative. Insourcing is used most often as a temporary measure when the workforce must be contracted due to economic constraints.
Insourcing represents a compromise situation, especially from the employee’s perspective. Unless the external job market is especially dire or the rewards for handling more work with no more pay are especially rewarding, most employees won’t tolerate an insourced situation for long. Because the responsibilities of employees and management in an insourced model are temporary and in flux, a new KM initiative is simply an exercise in frustration.
In cosourcing, which is a combination of insourcing and outsourcing, a third party provides resources as an extension of the company’s resources. Cosourcing lies somewhere in the middle between insourcing and outsourcing when it comes to the applicability of a KM program. A company outsources its overflow of strategic processes without giving up control, especially during times of unexpected or seasonal demand. As in insourcing, a KM program is especially helpful in bringing employees and 53
E S S E N T I A L S o f K n o w l e d g e M a n a g e m e n t management up to speed in handling tasks that may be new to them, and knowledge of exactly how business processes are carried out can help external vendors more quickly perform the tasks required of them.
Shared services is a business model in which back-end services, such as payroll and accounts receivable, are moved to an external business unit and the parent company remains the main or sole customer. Early on in the life of the shared business unit, revenue reporting and employee reward are likely thought the province of the parent corporation. Later, however, the shared business unit may have no ties to the parent corporation, other than having the parent corporation as a major customer.
Because of the flux within the shared business unit, a KM initiative within the shared business unit would be a waste of time. Later, however, when the processes within the shared business unit have stabilized and the unit is a mature company, KM principles can be used to help management and employees of the unit.
Upsetting the Corporate Equilibrium
Ideally, implementing a program designed to improve the bottom line should make life easier for management as well. After all, when it comes to Knowledge Management, what managers wouldn’t want to know exactly how the employees they supervise are performing their duties?
However, often a KM initiative represents a challenge to all levels of management, especially if managers aren’t flexible enough to redefine their roles in the organization.
One challenge is staying focused on managing, as opposed to micro-managing. Management doesn’t need to know every detail of how things are accomplished; effective managers intuitively know when to delegate responsibility and operation details to their subordinates. Knowledge of processes to a fine level of granularity leads to the temptation to micro-manage processes.
54
K n o w l e d g e O r g a n i z a t i o n s
Even though the goal of Knowledge Management isn’t reengineering, a KM program is likely to highlight inefficiencies and inequities in the corporation that management may feel compelled to rectify. For example, if a KM initiative reveals that higher-level employees are performing tasks that could be done less expensively by other employees, then the burden of work may shift, pitting the higher- and lower-salaried employees against another. If senior management discovers that it’s better for the bottom line of the organization if some of the administrative tasks currently performed by the professional staff are offloaded to administrative staff, the administrative staff may feel cheated and may attempt to sabotage the KM initiative if they do not accept their increased workload.
In addition to upsetting the balance of power in an organization, a KM initiative can threaten both management and employees. From management’s perspective, there is the threat of change when and if the CKO leaves. Will the replacement CKO bring yet another set of ideas and technology tools that everyone in the organization will have to take time to learn?
Another issue, illustrated by Mary’s experience with Jane and Medical Multimedia, is that employees are usually very protective of slack time.
Most employees won’t voluntarily reveal all of their timesaving techniques, especially if they’ve determined through their own know-how to fulfill their job requirements more quickly or accurately. The quintessential tale of slack in industry is detailed by Ben Hamper in his book Rivethead:Tales from the Assembly Line.Working on an assembly line in Detroit, he manages to figure out how to work smarter so that he can perform a day’s work in an hour or two and take the rest of the day off.
As Hamper demonstrates, this guarding of personal slack time isn’t necessarily laziness but reflects life in organizations that don’t officially reward or even acknowledge knowledge sharing.
55
E S S E N T I A L S o f K n o w l e d g e M a n a g e m e n t Given the likelihood that a KM initiative will at least temporarily upset operations, from management’s perspective, there must be a compelling reason for making the corporate-wide investment in an initiative.
Often, however, initially there are more questions than answers. For example, how much will implementing a KM initiative cost, both now and over the life of the project? How long will it take to realize the benefits? How much will an initiative detract from the work in progress? What are the risks to the corporation? What of the return on investment, and how can it be measured? As described in more detail in Chapter 7, this latter determination is especially challenging, given that the current rules of accounting say that intangibles are recorded as assets only when they are purchased from another company, not when they are created internally.
The next chapter explores Knowledge Management with a focus on the source of much of the intellectual capital in a knowledge organization, the employee.
Summary
Knowledge Management involves rethinking how management relates to employees. At issue is how to reward the mentors and other knowledge-able employees for the incremental value they create in the company through sharing their knowledge. In many regards, the basic principles of Knowledge Management go against human nature, in that employees, as well as managers, are naturally reluctant to give up their hard-won advantages. This reluctance to share the real core of information isn’t limited to business but is also prevalent in academia, which is established around KM principles. Researchers often offer statistical summaries and generalizations instead of raw data, and the technical details of leading-edge technologies are rarely published in a timely manner unless tenure or significant funding is at stake.
56
K n o w l e d g e O r g a n i z a t i o n s
True leaders are hardly known to their followers.
Next after them are the leaders the people know and admire; after them, those they fear; after them, those they despise.
—Lao-Tzu
57
C H A P T E R 3
Knowledge Workers
After reading this chapter you will be able to
• Understand the significance of the increased overhead on knowledge workers associated with a Knowledge
Management project
• Understand the applicability of Business to Employee (B2E) management in a knowledge-management initiative
• Appreciate the concerns of knowledge workers, including decreased job security
• Appreciate methods of developing and maintaining knowledge worker loyalty
• Understand how to encourage the formation of communities of practice
• Understand the importance of education in enhancing knowledge workers’ effectiveness and the value they add to the corporation
In the realm of Knowledge Management (KM),employees and managers who contribute significantly to the intellectual capital of the company are called knowledge workers. In practice, the distinction is a matter of degree, in that even manual laborers bring to their company the knowledge of their trade.What’s more, whether employees are valued 58
K n o w l e d g e W o r k e r s
for the knowledge they bring to the corporation depends on whether their knowledge is recorded or otherwise captured for future use.
So-called knowledge organizations—corporations that take a systematic approach to capturing this information—transform employees and managers to knowledge workers, regardless of their actual job titles or duties. But even the best knowledge organizations don’t treat every employee as a knowledge worker.
The typical knowledge worker in corporate America works in marketing, intellectual property, engineering, programming, and other occupations that involve more thought than physical labor. For example, artists in the marketing division who produce the media files are typically considered knowledge workers, as media can constitute the intellectual capital of a company, whether the company is a knowledge organization or not. Knowledge workers typically add to the value of the corporation by contributing to the corporate knowledge assets, by documenting problems solving activities, by reporting best practices, and by disseminating information in newsletters, online, and in other publications. In each case, the knowledge worker is either the conduit for or the source of the information.
Customer support representatives are commonly considered knowledge workers because they work with information from customers through direct contact; through interactions through the phone, e-mail, or traditional mail; or through directly observing customer activity in a retail setting. Managers at all levels can be considered knowledge workers if they are involved in creating new revenues from existing knowledge by reformatting and repackaging information in existing markets or introducing existing products into new markets.
Most KM initiatives revolve around knowledge workers, whether they’re interacting with customers directly, indirectly through computer systems, or with other knowledge workers and managers. This chapter 59
E S S E N T I A L S o f K n o w l e d g e M a n a g e m e n t explores Knowledge Management with a focus on the primary source of intellectual capital, the knowledge worker. To illustrate the challenges associated with managing knowledge workers, let’s continue to explore the events at Medical Multimedia.
Unfortunate Loss
Jane started at Medical Multimedia as a part-time freelance graphic artist, working on special projects that the full-time staff didn’t have the time or resources to handle. As the company grew, her billable hours increased to the point where it was more economical for the company to offer her a full-time position. Even though she enjoyed the freedom of consulting, the security of the full-time position won her over.
A year later, as Medical Multimedia expanded its product line, the need for an in-house high-end three-dimensional (3-D) artist became apparent to Ron, the manager of the multimedia department. Faced with the prospect of training one of the artists who had been with the company from the start or Jane, Ron decided to ignore seniority and send Jane for training because of her aptitude for the medium. After attending the out-of-state program for six weeks, Jane returned to take full responsibility for all of the 3-D graphics work in the company.
In all, it took Jane about three months to become competent enough to create professional 3-D artwork for the company. Meanwhile, the other artists in the company began to voice their desire to obtain additional company-sponsored education in a variety of graphic arts areas. However, with new time pressures, Ron couldn’t afford to send any more artists out for continuing education. Instead, he encouraged in-house education by establishing a weekly pizza lunch during which someone from the group could present some aspect of his or her work and describe the techniques involved. At first, the meeting was little more than a chance to socialize and to enjoy a free lunch. After a few weeks, however, several artists began 60
K n o w l e d g e W o r k e r s
taking the opportunity to share their knowledge seriously, and the lunch hour became a real opportunity for them to share their experiences and explain techniques and tricks for each of the software packages they used in creating content for the company.
When Mary stepped into her new role of describing exactly how all knowledge workers performed their jobs, the weekly lunchtime education meeting became a forum for discussing the changing landscape of the company, and several members voiced concerns over the security of their positions. With the threat of downsizing on their minds, many of the artists became hesitant to reveal the secrets behind their techniques.
Group consensus was that the best approach was to give only as much detail as necessary to comply with the dictates of management, but no more. When it came time for Jane to meet with Mary regarding the details of her work, Jane managed to put the meeting off for almost a month while she explored her career options.
Since she was the only one in the group with knowledge of the $10,000 3-D rendering program, it was progressively easier for her to fulfill the expectations of management, and she gradually became more proficient with the software. Sharing her knowledge of the time-saving tricks that she had learned the hard way would mean giving up not only her proprietary knowledge but also her slack time.With no clear incentive to share her secrets, she avoided Mary for as long as possible—all the while searching the Net for other opportunities.
When she could no longer avoid Mary, Jane agreed to a meeting, during which she revealed one of her techniques. With a follow-up interview scheduled the next day, and no intention of divulging anything more substantial, she gave notice to her manager, Ron. Shortly thereafter, Jane headed west to start a business with a friend, offering high-end 3-D graphics to companies like Medical Multimedia. As a result, the company was set back several months.
61
E S S E N T I A L S o f K n o w l e d g e M a n a g e m e n t The departure motivated management to rethink its position on how knowledge workers are rewarded for contributing to the intellectual assets of the company, including formal recognition of contributions in the company newsletter, and bonuses for exemplary contributions.
Issues
The experiences of the management and the knowledge workers in Medical Multimedia illustrates several key issues:
• Knowledge Management involves maintaining as much of the knowledge worker’s relevant knowledge for the corporation as possible.
• A KM initiative must reflect the reality that knowledge workers vary in knowledge, skills, and aptitude.
• In evaluating the contribution of knowledge workers in the modern knowledge organization, there is a significant difference between knowing and doing.
• The knowledge worker–management relationship can’t be left to chance but must be managed.
• A KM initiative must include investing in knowledge worker loyalty.
• Continuing knowledge worker education is essential to maintaining the value delivered by knowledge workers.
• Although communities of practice are self-organizing structures, management should facilitate their formation and direction.
• A new business model or management initiative, no matter how innovative and promising, must consider human behavior.
• A KM initiative represents additional overhead, much of which is borne by knowledge workers in their daily work.
62
K n o w l e d g e W o r k e r s
Knowledge Worker Relationship Management
Knowledge workers bring certain competencies—combinations of skills, knowledge, and attitudes—to the corporation in exchange for pay, benefits, recognition, a sense of contributing to something greater than themselves, an increased sense of self-worth, the opportunity to work with and learn from others, and, in many knowledge organizations, formal educational opportunities. Within the constraints imposed on hiring and firing practices by unions and the government, companies are free to manage the relationships with their knowledge workers.
For example, in boom times, it’s a simple matter to attract and hire the best talent that money and, more important, stock options can buy. In leaner times, when downsizing is necessary, the challenge is developing and growing the best knowledge workers—those who can contribute most to the value of the organization—to maintain competitiveness and to have resources available when the economy rebounds.
Successful companies actively manage their knowledge workers in good times and more challenging times as if those workers were customers.
They practice employee relationship management (ERM), a process though which knowledge workers who demonstrably add significant value to the company by contributing more value than the company is investing in them are enticed to stay and contribute their skills and knowledge in exchange for compensation (see Exhibit 3.1). In a knowledge organization, ERM, which applies customer relations management (CRM) techniques to the knowledge worker-company relationship is defined as: A dynamic process of managing the relationship between knowledge workers and the corporation such that knowledge workers elect to continue a mutually beneficial exchange of intellectual assets for compensation in a way that provides maximum value to the corporation and they are dissuaded from participating in activities that are unprofitable to the corporation.
63
E S S E N T I A L S o f K n o w l e d g e M a n a g e m e n t E X H I B I T 3 . 1
Dissuade
Compensation +
Overhead
Knowledge +
Skills +
Attitude
Encourage
In the context of Knowledge Management, ERM is about managing the relationship between knowledge workers and management, with each contributing to and receiving something from the relationship.Whereas knowledge workers expect compensation for their contributions, cor-TEAMFLY
porate management expects demonstrable value and a degree of loyalty.
A management that simply follows the wishes of knowledge workers rather than directs them can result in an unwieldy situation in which the
“inmates are running the asylum.”
In profitable business operations, managing knowledge worker relationships entails saying yes to some knowledge worker demands or requests and no to others, and regularly evaluating the value added by knowledge workers. Companys accrue costs related to ongoing relationships with knowledge workers, regardless of whether those workers add significant value to the company. For example, there is the cost of overhead, which normally includes direct compensation, benefits, social security contributions, physical space, management supervision, human resource services, equipment rental, and e