Not a member?     Existing members login below:
Holidays Offer
 

Our Insane Anti-American Energy Policy

Science magazine (Dec.10, 1976) warned of ?extensive Northern Hemisphere glaciations?. Science Digest (February 1973) reported
that ?the world‘s climatologists are agreed ? that we must ? prepare for the next ice age?. The Christian Science Monitor (? Warning:
Earth‘s Climate is Changing Faster than Even Experts Expect, ? Aug . 27 , 1974) reports that glaciers ? have begun to advance ,? ?…
growing seasons in England and Scandinavia are getting shorter ? and ? …the North Atlantic is cooling down about as fast as an ocean
can cool?. Newsweek agreed ( the Cooling World, ? April 28, 1975) that meteorologists ?are almost unanimous ? that catastrophic
famines might result from the global cooling and the New York Times (Sept. 14, 1975) said ?…may return to another ice age?. The
Times (May 21, 1975) also said ?… a major cooling of the climate is widely considered inevitable ? now that it is ?…well
established? that the Northern Hemisphere‘s climate ? has been getting cooler since about 1950?. From Fortune (February 1974).
?Climatologists now blame those recurring droughts and floods on a global cooling trend. It could bring massive tragedies for
mankind?.
In 1969 environmentalist Nigel Calder warned, ?The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source
of wholesale death and misery for mankind?. In 1968, professor Paul Ehrilch predicted, ?…in the 1970‘s …hundreds of millions of
people are going to starve to death? as he predicted there would be major food shortages due to the impending cold weather.
There are more comments about the dangers of the new ?ice age? but that should be enough to show that global cooling was
considered to be a real problem in the 70‘s. They were wrong and very wrong. The news media that presented this terrible doom–day
forecast about a coming ice age is the same group that presented global warming to us just 25 years later. How could they change so
quickly and why should we believe them now?
Phil Jones, head of Great Britain‘s University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit (CRU) and a well known promoter of global
warming, stated, ?…the difference of warming rates for the periods 1860-1880, 1910-1940, and 1975-2009 is statistically insignificant
… and that there has been no statistically – significant global warming since 1995; that in fact global temperatures have been trending
to the downside since January of 2002. ?.
Therefore, this chapter should be ended with the conclusion that global warming is non-existent and is not any more of a problem than
the previously predicted ice age . However, let me assure the reader that the global warming industry will not accept this and that they
will not go away. It is an industry and they have an agenda on which their employment depends and which they will not drop.
Vicious alarmists
Later we will look at the deliberate lies and deceptions involved with Climategate but it is of interest to realize the viciousness and
hate that some of these alarmists have for those who disagree with them. A June 2, 2009 article posted to Talking Points Memo asked,
?At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers??. In June 2009, former Clinton administration official Joe Romm
commented on his Climate Progress web site, ?An entire generation will soon be ready to strangle you and your kind while you sleep
in your beds?. In 2008, Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki called for governmental leaders skeptical of global warming to be
thrown ?into jail?. In 2007, the Weather Channel‘s climate expert called for withholding certification of skeptical meteorologists.
A July 2007 Senate report detailed how skeptical scientists have faced threats and intimidation. NASA‘s James Hansen has called for
trials of climate skeptics in 2008 for ?high crimes against humanity?. Environmentalist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lashed out at skeptics of
2007 declaring. ?This is treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors?. In 2009 RFK Jr. also called coal companies ?criminal
enterprises‘ and declared CEO‘s ?should be in jail for all of eternity?. These people are radical and vicious (and insane?) and are intent
on keeping global warming as an accepted doctrine.
So, let us embark on a look at GLOBAL WARMING.
?The Sky is Falling? said Chicken Little
The term ?global warming? does not sound very bad for warm is usually better than cold. Therefore, it is necessary for them to define
it in such a manner that we will be concerned about it. So, we have alarmists who will describe all of the terrible things that happen
because of global warming so that we will not want that to happen to us.
We‘ll start with the most famous of those who claim that global warming is a real problem and that ?it is settled science? and that ?the
debate is over?.– Nobel Laureate, Al Gore who won the prize for his movie , An Inconvenient Truth. However, a British judge, Justice
Burton, ruled there were nine instances in the movie in which Gore went so far outside the scientific mainstream that he deemed his
presentation ?alarmist? and ?apocalyptic?. The British government, who is very supportive of global warming dangers, had ordered a
copy sent to every public high school in the country and the judge ruled that any school which showed the movie would have to tell
the students of nine gross errors. ( the judge missed the biggest error for Gore had included the now discredited ?hockey stick? graph
as truth)
Sea levels were predicted to rise 20 feet, low lying pacific atolls were being inundated with the rising sea levels because of global
warming and inhabitants were being forced to evacuate , the Ocean Conveyor will shut down, there is a direct coincidence between
the rise in carbon dioxide and temperature, the snows of Kilimanjaro are disappearing, Lake Chad has dried up because of global
warming, Hurricane Katrina was caused by global warming, polar bears are decreasing in number, and coral reefs are bleaching and
fish species are decreasing at a rate 1000 times greater than normal. All of the claims are indeed ?alarmist ? and ?apocalyptic? as the
judge said and also erroneous. These claims are so ridiculous that it makes you wonder at AL Gore‘s sanity. The book and movie were
effective for they were not exposed in our country and are essentially accepted and are still used and cited by these nutty alarmists.
3
Remove