its simply superb and so useful to have dating with any girl
thanks

principles not principals. otherwise good!

I thought I commented on this book before. Anyway - I dare any man - and I mean ANY man to try out these techniques for ONE MONTH and keep a journal and tell us what happens. I don't believe these techniques would work on any sane, working, attractive woman with an active life and any level of intelligence and discernment. But I am willing to be proven wrong.

I don't care if you're fat, ugly, cheap, buff, athletic, wealthy, poor, average, - whatever you are, if you are a man - I CHALLENGE you to try these techniques (and only these techniques outlined in this ebook: Day Game Dating (The Five Vital Princi'pals')). Keep a journal of how many very attractive, employed, intelligent, sane women you get. THEN try these same techniques for ANOTHER MONTH on the same type of woman - only this time, she has to be the OPPOSITE of what you find attractive and desirable. I just want to see if these techniques work universally. If you end up going on a few fun dates - well consider that part of the cost of doing this business.

Oh - and your journal has to be a VIDEO JOURNAL. Yeah, my momma din't raise no foo'! If you can prove that these techniques work more often than they don't - I'll give you a prize at the end of the two months. But you have to follow the rules. First try them on the "ungettable" gorgeous girls for a month and then try them on the "forgettable" ugly girls for a month. Or vice versa. You choose which group you want to tackle first.

If there are a ton of winners, I'll pull from a list for a prize. Leave your email in a message and let me know when the first video diary gets uploaded. Remember - this is a daily video journal. Doesn't have to be ten minutes long, just tell us who you met (initials only), what she looked like, what you said, and what happened (total rejection, cold shoulder, number given, smile, a date, or homerun).

As a woman, I found it to be quite amateurish. The ideas are pedestrian, contradictory, juvenile, and redundant. Not to mention the grammar is really poor. I will definitely watch out for some guy trying to use these techniques on me. It has potential, but in its current state - I don't recommend it. This guy should edit it, rewrite it, tighten it up, and use first-hand accounts of men who have used these techniques and the results they've gotten from them. With all his consulting and seminars and boot camps and live action teaching - taking his word for it when he should have ample real life statistics to back his claims up simply doesn't cut it for me (as a woman). I see the men who have read this love it though. 9 out of 10 women would read this and shake their head though. And would def not give it more than two stars in its current published state. There's only five techniques - c'mon, how hard could it be to prove that they actually work??