# A Conspiracy to Selectively Withhold Science Information

Reduced from A CONSPIRACY in SCIENCE in PROGREESS 3 Visit PEET SCHUTTE STOREFRONT @ GOOGLE OR @LULU.COM
has contact with the earth than there could ever be between Jupiter and the sun when using this formula
F
=
G
M
1
r
M
2
? But this is part of what Symeof never can understand. It shows that those that study
2
physics never tested what they were told apply in cosmic physics. They never put the correct mass as
applying numbers into
F
=
G
M
1
r
M
2
and put in place the radius between the sun and whatever planet
2
and come to a mathematical conclusion. Any person trying to put mathematical values in this equation
that is supposed to be in place to show how solar bodies are positioned will realise it has no value. You
that can calculate it
so then do it. Show
a
3
is valid. Please show how mass by 4ʩ2a3 = P2G(M + m) can produce planet positions. It is
that
GM
2
hogwash. Look at the picture and try to put mass into perspective in relation to planet positions!
2nd Smallest
4th Smallest
By depicting the
solar system in such
a presentation as
Newtonians normally
do such as the
picture next this form
of presenting the
layout without
providing correct
spacing purposely
corrupts the entire
structure formation
by which the solar
system develops. It
then purposely hides
the essence that
forms the solar
system.
5th Smallest
2nd Biggest
5th Biggest
Biggest
3 rd Smallest
Smallest
Pieces of rock
4th Biggest
In accordance with reality as reality applies in the solar system
there is no big or small because big or small solid or gas massive
or fragmented, all the planets are the very same, just as
everything falling is the very same irrespective of structure or
size. All the planets float in a bowl of liquid that renders the
entire lot big or small mass notwithstanding, everyone equal.
This is so typical Newtonian in every sense there is in science. Can anybody, even those with the
mentality of Symeof and his gang see that the planets are not arranged from the biggest that is most
massive and then therefore should be closest to the sun and smallest way to the outside as they should if
plants orbits P2 was the result of size or mass G(M + m) and mass has no place in the layout?
Newtonians make a statement about “mass” holding the solar system in place. No matter how much this
is corrupt, nevertheless they put it down as a given fact so much so that they will show doubt in a living
God being present but that mass pulls planets goes beyond doubt. The proof of mass pulling to form
gravity can never be tested because it is beyond doubt. If you doubt in it they throw a Newtonian made
formula they call Kepler’s laws at you. “Kepler’s third law” supposedly is "the square of the orbital period
of a planet is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit." In mathematics it is
Symbolically: and therefore a3 = P2 in position of P and therefore a3 / (P2P). This is taken from
the idea that “Kepler said”, which is totally fabricated that a3=T2 where Kepler said in fact a3=T2k and this
is a big difference because a3=T2k is the same as E=mC2. Look at reality. a3 = P2 is total garbage and as
big a hoax as is the idea of mass being any form of factor in gravitational physics or that gravity applies in
accordance with
F
=
G
M
1
r
M
2
. Look at the picture below. Look at how the planets are sorted and that
2
is not by size. There is a ratio applying called the Titius Bode law and this law puts planets in terms of
size or mass at a precise equal base notwithstanding that Jupiter is many time bigger than Mercury.
Everyone is so taken by the accuracy of Einstein’s formula that E=mC2 but this is exactly Kepler’s formula
where E3=mC2 is taken from Kepler’s formula when accurately used as a3=T2k. There is no a3 = P2.