# A Conspiracy to Selectively Withhold Science Information

Reduced from A CONSPIRACY in SCIENCE in PROGREESS 3 Visit PEET SCHUTTE STOREFRONT @ GOOGLE OR @LULU.COM

has contact with the earth than there could ever be between Jupiter and the sun when using this formula

F

=

G

M

1

r

M

2

? But this is part of what Symeof never can understand. It shows that those that study

2

physics never tested what they were told apply in cosmic physics. They never put the correct mass as

applying numbers into

F

=

G

M

1

r

M

2

and put in place the radius between the sun and whatever planet

2

and come to a mathematical conclusion. Any person trying to put mathematical values in this equation

that is supposed to be in place to show how solar bodies are positioned will realise it has no value. You

that can calculate it

so then do it. Show

a

3

is valid. Please show how mass by 4ʩ2a3 = P2G(M + m) can produce planet positions. It is

that

GM

2

hogwash. Look at the picture and try to put mass into perspective in relation to planet positions!

2nd Smallest

4th Smallest

By depicting the

solar system in such

a presentation as

Newtonians normally

do such as the

picture next this form

of presenting the

layout without

providing correct

spacing purposely

corrupts the entire

structure formation

by which the solar

system develops. It

then purposely hides

the essence that

forms the solar

system.

5th Smallest

2nd Biggest

5th Biggest

Biggest

3 rd Smallest

Smallest

Pieces of rock

4th Biggest

In accordance with reality as reality applies in the solar system

there is no big or small because big or small solid or gas massive

or fragmented, all the planets are the very same, just as

everything falling is the very same irrespective of structure or

size. All the planets float in a bowl of liquid that renders the

entire lot big or small mass notwithstanding, everyone equal.

This is so typical Newtonian in every sense there is in science. Can anybody, even those with the

mentality of Symeof and his gang see that the planets are not arranged from the biggest that is most

massive and then therefore should be closest to the sun and smallest way to the outside as they should if

plants orbits P2 was the result of size or mass G(M + m) and mass has no place in the layout?

Newtonians make a statement about “mass” holding the solar system in place. No matter how much this

is corrupt, nevertheless they put it down as a given fact so much so that they will show doubt in a living

God being present but that mass pulls planets goes beyond doubt. The proof of mass pulling to form

gravity can never be tested because it is beyond doubt. If you doubt in it they throw a Newtonian made

formula they call Kepler’s laws at you. “Kepler’s third law” supposedly is "the square of the orbital period

of a planet is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit." In mathematics it is

Symbolically: and therefore a3 = P2 in position of P and therefore a3 / (P2P). This is taken from

the idea that “Kepler said”, which is totally fabricated that a3=T2 where Kepler said in fact a3=T2k and this

is a big difference because a3=T2k is the same as E=mC2. Look at reality. a3 = P2 is total garbage and as

big a hoax as is the idea of mass being any form of factor in gravitational physics or that gravity applies in

accordance with

F

=

G

M

1

r

M

2

. Look at the picture below. Look at how the planets are sorted and that

2

is not by size. There is a ratio applying called the Titius Bode law and this law puts planets in terms of

size or mass at a precise equal base notwithstanding that Jupiter is many time bigger than Mercury.

Everyone is so taken by the accuracy of Einstein’s formula that E=mC2 but this is exactly Kepler’s formula

where E3=mC2 is taken from Kepler’s formula when accurately used as a3=T2k. There is no a3 = P2.